Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-89wxm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-07T13:23:52.418Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - Advocate

Community Policing

from Part I - Community Policing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 August 2019

David Weisburd
Affiliation:
George Mason University, Virginia
Anthony A. Braga
Affiliation:
Northeastern University, Boston
Get access

Summary

The concept of community policing is very popular with politicians and the general public – so popular that few police chiefs want to be caught without some program they can call community policing. As early as 1997, a survey of police departments conducted by the Police Foundation found that 85 percent reported they had adopted community policing or were in the process of doing so (Skogan, 2005). The biggest reason they gave for not doing so was that community policing was “impractical” for their community. In my own tabulations of the data, this reply was mostly from small departments with only a few officers. Bigger cities included in the survey (those with populations greater than 100,000) all claimed to have adopted community policing – half (they recalled) by 1991 and the other half between 1992 and 1997. The most recent similar figures come from a national survey of departments conducted in 2013. In my tabulations, about 95 percent of the departments in cities of more than 250,000 in population that had an official mission statement included a commitment to community policing (Bureau of Justice Statistics, 2015).

Type
Chapter
Information
Police Innovation
Contrasting Perspectives
, pp. 27 - 44
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Braga, A. A., Weisburd, D. L., Waring, E. J., Mazerolle, L. G., Spelman, W., & Gajewski, F. (1999). Problem-oriented policing in violent crime places: A randomized controlled experiment. Criminology, 37, 541580.Google Scholar
Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2001). Community Policing in Local Police Departments 1997 and 1999. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics, US Department of Justice.Google Scholar
Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2015). Local Police Departments, 2013: Personnel, Policies and Practices. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics, US Department of Justice.Google Scholar
Cordner, G., & Biebel, E. (2003). Research for practice: Problem-oriented policing in practice. National Institute of Justice, unpublished research report.Google Scholar
Capowich, G. E. (2005). A case study of community policing implementation: Contrasting success and failure. In Kerley, K. R. (ed.), Policing and Program Evaluation, pp. 138153. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Eck, J. E. (2004). Why don’t problems get solved? In Skogan, W. G. (ed.), Community Policing: Can It Work? pp. 185206. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Eck, J. E., & Wartell, J. (1998). Improving the management of rental properties with drug problems: A randomized experiment. In Mazerolle, L. G., & Roehl, J. (eds.), Civil Remedies and Crime Prevention, vol. 9, Crime Prevention Studies. pp. 161185. Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.Google Scholar
Gallup, Inc. (2015). Americans’ Confidence in Institutions Stays Low. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Gallup, Inc. (2016). Public Opinion Context: Americans, Race and Police. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Gill, C., Weisburd, D., Telep, C. W., Vitter, Z., & Bennett, T. (2014). Community-oriented policing to reduce crime, disorder and fear and increase satisfaction and legitimacy among citizens: a systematic review. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 10, 399428.Google Scholar
Greene, J. R. (2004). Community policing and police organization. In Skogan, W. G. (ed.), Community Policing: Can It Work? Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, 3054.Google Scholar
Grinc, R. M. (1994). ‘Angles in marble’: Problems in stimulating community involvement in community policing. Crime & Delinquency, 40, 437468.Google Scholar
Kochel, T. R. (2017). Applying police legitimacy, cooperation, and collective security hypotheses to explain collective efficacy and violence across neighbourhoods. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, 120.Google Scholar
Lurigio, A., & Rosenbaum, D. (1994). The impact of community policing on police personnel. In Rosenbaum, D. P. (ed.), The Challenge of Community Policing: Testing the Promises, pp. 147163. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maguire, E. R., Shin, Y., Jhao, J., & Hassel, K. D. (2003). Structural change in large police agencies during the 1990s. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies and Management, 26, 251275.Google Scholar
Mastrofski, S. D. (1998). Community policing and police organization structure. In Brodeur, J. (ed.), How to Tecognize Good Policing: Problems and Issues, pp. 161189. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Office of Community Oriented Policing Services. (2011). The Impact of the Economic Downturn on American Police Agencies. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice.Google Scholar
Pate, A. M., & Shtull, P. (1994). Community policing grows in Brooklyn: An inside view of the New York police department’s model precinct. Crime & Delinquency, 40, 384410.Google Scholar
Pew Research Center. (2015). Beyond Distrust: How Americans View Their Government. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
President’s Task Force on 21st Century Policing. (2015). Final Report of the President’s Task Force on 21st Century Policing. Washington, DC: Office of Community Oriented Policing Services.Google Scholar
Sadd, S., & Grinc, R. (1994). Innovative neighborhood oriented policing: An evaluation of community policing programs in eight cities. In Rosenbaum, D. P. (ed.), The Challenge of Community Policing: Testing the Promises. pp. 2752. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Sampson, R., Raudenbush, S., & Earls, F. (1997). Neighborhoods and violent crime. Science, 277, 918924.Google Scholar
Skogan, W. G. (1988). Community organizations and crime. In Tonry, M., & Morris, N., (eds.), Crime and Justice: An Annual Review, pp. 3978. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Skogan, W. G. (1990). Disorder and Decline: Crime and the Spiral of Decay in American Cities. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Skogan, W. G. (2005). Community policing: Common impediments to success. In Fridell, L., & Wycoff, M. A. (eds.), Community Policing: The Past, Present and Future, pp. 159167. Washington, DC: Police Executive Research Forum.Google Scholar
Skogan, W. G. (2006). Police and Community in Chicago. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Skogan, W. G. (2009). Policing Immigrant Communities in the United States. In McDonald, W. F. (ed.), Immigration, Crime and Justice, pp. 189204. Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing.Google Scholar
Skogan, W. G. (2012). Collective action, structural disadvantage and crime. Journal of Police Studies, 25, 135152.Google Scholar
Skogan, W. G., & Hartnett, S. M. (1997). Community policing, Chicago style. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Skogan, W. G. Hartnett, S. M., DuBois, J., Comey, J. T., Kaiser, M., & Lovig, J. H. (1999). On the Beat: Police and Community Problem Solving. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
Skogan, W. G., & Steiner, L. (2004). Crime, disorder and decay in Chicago’s Latino Community. Journal of Ethnicity in Criminal Justice, 2, 726.Google Scholar
Weisburd, D., McElroy, J., & Hardyman, P. (1988). Challenges to supervision in community policing: Observations on a pilot project. American Journal of Police, 7, 2950.Google Scholar
Weisburd, D., & Majmundar, M. K. (eds). (2018). Proactive Policing: Effects on Crime and Communities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
Willis, J. J., Mastrofski, S. D., & Kochel, T. R. (2010). The co-implementation of Compstat and community policing. Journal of Criminal Justice, 38, 969980.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×