Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xm8r8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-02T20:12:22.008Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

12 - Laparoscopic techniques

from Part II - Management of developmental abnormalities of the genital tract

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 May 2010

Azad S. Najmaldin
Affiliation:
St James University Hospital, Leeds, UK
Alfred Cutner
Affiliation:
Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Hospital, London, UK
Adam H. Balen
Affiliation:
Leeds Teaching Hospitals, University Trust
Sarah M. Creighton
Affiliation:
University College London Hospitals
Melanie C. Davies
Affiliation:
University College London
Jane MacDougall
Affiliation:
Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge
Richard Stanhope
Affiliation:
Great Ormond Street Hospital
Get access

Summary

Introduction

The first gynaecological reports for laparoscopy came from Hope in 1937 (Hope, 1937) on the diagnosis of extrauterine pregnancy but it was not until the 1970s that laparoscopic surgery started to become established (Semm, 1970). The introduction of good-resolution camera systems and the development of new surgical instruments have enabled the advancement of laparoscopic surgery. In addition, advances in technology have increased the safety parameters and enabled surgery to be performed more efficiently. These technological developments include the expansion of bipolar technology and the introduction of laser modalities, the harmonic scalpel and haemostatic stapling devices.

Originally laparoscopic surgery was referred to as minimally invasive surgery but it soon became apparent that the surgery was highly invasive but performed through small incisions, and hence the term minimal access surgery was coined. Minimal access surgery can be considered as an alternative procedure to the traditional operation; it aims to achieve the same end result as the traditional operation but is performed through small incisions. In hysteroscopic surgery, most laparoscopic procedures should aim to emulate the open operation, the only difference being the size of the incision. However, there may be modifications in the minimal access route as a result of the improved vision that it affords or the difficulty in emulating the open procedure. The perceived disadvantages of the laparoscopic route over the open route are the potential complications, the time to perform the operation and the cost.

Type
Chapter
Information
Paediatric and Adolescent Gynaecology
A Multidisciplinary Approach
, pp. 131 - 146
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, I D, Chan, M, Clifford, P C et al. (1986). Computer aided diagnosis of acute abdominal pain: a multi-centre study. Br Med J 293, 800–804CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adamyan L V (1995). Laparoscopic management of vaginal aplasia with or without functioning noncommunicating rudimentary uterus. In Principles of Laparoscopic Surgery, Arrequi M E, Fitzgibbons R J, Katkhouda N, McKernan J B, Reich H eds., pp. 646–651. Springer-Verlag, New York
Anderson, B, Polla, J, Turner, D, Chapman, G, Buller, R (1993). Ovarian transposition in cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 49, 206–214CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
*,Anon. (1999). A consensus document concerning laparoscopic entry techniques: Middlesbrough, March 19–20 1999. Gynecolog Endosc 8, 403–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ansbacher, R (1993). Uterine anomalies and future pregnancies. Clin Perinatol 10, 295–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagolau, P, Rivosecchi, M, Giorlandino, C (1992). Prenatal diagnosis and clinical outcome of ovarian cyst. J Pediatr Surg 27, 879–881CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, J W, Morgan, R C, Peckham, M J, Smithers, D W (1972). Presentation of ovarian function in patients requiring radiotherapy for paraortic and pelvic Hodgkin's disease. Lancet , 1307–1308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balzer, K M, Witte, H, Recknagel, S, Kozianka, J, Waleczek, H (1999). Anatomic guidelines for the prevention of abdominal wall hematoma induced by trocar placement. Surg Radiol Anat 21, 87–89CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Busacca, M, Perino, A, Venezia, R (1996). Laparoscopic—ultrasonographic combined technique for the creation of a neovagina in Mayer—Rokitansky—Kuster—Hauser syndrome. Fertil Steril 66, 1039–1041CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
*Buttram, V C, Gibbons, W E (1979). Mullerian anomalies: a proposed classification (an analysis of 144 cases). Fertil Steril 32, 40–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canis, M, Wattiez, A, Pouly, J L et al. (1990). Laparoscopic management of unicornuate uterus with rudimentary horn and unilateral extensive endometriosis: case report. Hum Reprod 5, 819–820CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chang, W F, Lin, H H, Ho, H N et al. (1994). Ultrasound diagnosis of rudimentary uterine horn pregnancy at fourteen weeks of gestation: a case report. Asia-Oceania J Obstet Gynecol 20, 279–282CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chapron, C, Morice, P, Dupre La Tour, M, Chavet, X, Dubuisson, J-B (1995). Laparoscopic management of assymetric Mayer—Rokitansky—Kuster—Hauser syndrome. Hum Reprod 10, 369–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapron, C, Querleu, D, Bruhat, M A et al. (1998). Surgical complications of diagnostic and operative gynaecological laparoscopy: a series of 29 966 cases. Hum Reprod 13, 867–872CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chatwani, A, Nyirjesy, P, Harmanli, O H, Grody, M H (1999). Creation of neovagina by laparoscopic Vecchietti operation. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 9, 425–427CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Childers, J M, Brzechffa, P R, Surwit, E A (1993). Laparoscopy using the left upper quadrant as the primary trocar site. Gynecol Oncol 50, 221–225CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coda, A, Bossotti, M, Ferri, F et al. (1999). Incisional hernia and fascial defect following laparoscopic surgery. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 9, 348–352CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Connell, R, Cutner, A, Creighton, S (2000). Laparoscopic removal of an ectopic uterus in a patient with Mayer—Rokitansky—Kuster—Hauser syndrome. J Obstet Gynecol 20, 97Google Scholar
Copeland, C, Wing, R, Hulka, J F (1983). Direct trocar insertion at laparoscopy: an evaluation. Obstet Gynecol 62, 655–659Google Scholar
Creighton, S, Minto, C L, Cutner, A (2000). Use of the ultrasonically activated scalpel in laparoscopic resection of a non-communicating rudimentary horn. Gynecol Endosc 9, 327–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cutner, A, Rymer, J (1998). Patient recovery after laparoscopic colposuspension. Gynecol Endosc 7, 307–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davydov, S N (1969). Colpopoiesis from the peritoneum of the ueterorectal space. Obstet Gynecol (Moscow) 12, 255–257Google Scholar
Decadt, B, Sussman, L, Lewis, M P N et al. (1999). Randomised clinical trial of early laparoscopy in the management of acute nonspecific abdominal pain. Br J Surg 86, 1383–1386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Desa, D J (1975). Follicular ovarian cysts in stillbirth and neonates. Arch Dis Child 50, 45–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doligin, S E (2000). Ovarian masses in newborn. Semin Pediatr Surg 9, 121–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dulemba, J, Midgett, W, Freeman, M (1996). Laparoscopic management of a rudimentary horn pregnancy. Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 3, 627–630CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Esposito, C, Garipoli, V, Di Matteo, G, Pasquale, M (1998). Laparoscopic management of ovarian cysts in newborns. Surg Endosc 12, 1152–1154CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Falcone, T, Gidwani, G, Paraiso, M, Beverly, C, Goldberg, J (1997). Anatomical variation in the rudimentary horns of a unicornuate uterus: implications for laparoscopic surgery. Hum Reprod 12, 263–265CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fedele, L, Busacca, M, Candiani, M, Vignali, M (1994). Laparoscopic creation of a neovagina in Mayer—Rokitansky—Kuster—Hauser syndrome by modification of Vecchietti's operation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 171, 268–269CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
*Fedele, L, Bianchi, S, Zanconato, G, Raffaelli, R (2000). Laparoscopic creation of a neovagina in patients with Rokitansky syndrome: analysis of 52 cases. Fertil Steril 74, 384–389CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frank, R T (1938). The formation of an artificial vagina without operation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 35, 1053–1055CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gans, S L, Berci, G (1971). Advances in endoscopy of infants and children. J Pediatr Surg 6, 199–223CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gans, S L, Berci, G (1973). Peritoneoscopy in infants and children. J Pediatr Surg 8, 399–405CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garry, R, Clayton, R, Hawe, J (2000). The effect of endometriosis and its radical laparoscopic excision on quality of life indicators. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 107, 44–54CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gauwerky, J F H, Wallwiener, D, Bastert, G (1992). An endoscopically assisted technique for construction of a neovagina. Arch Gynecol Obstet 252, 59–63CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Giacalone, P L, Laffargue, F, Faure, J M, Deschamps, F (1999). Ultrasound-assisted laparoscopic creation of a neovagina by modification of Vecchietti's operation. Obstet Gynecol 93, 446–448CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Giatras, K, Licciardi, F, Grifo, J A (1998). Laparoscopy for pelvic pain in the Mayer—Rokitansky—Kuster—Hauser syndrome. J Reprod Med 43, 203–205Google ScholarPubMed
Grapin, C, Montague, J P, Sirinelli, D et al. (1987). Diagnosis of ovarian cysts in the perinatal period and therapeutic implications (20 cases). Ann Radiol 30, 497–502Google Scholar
Grunewald, B, Keating, J, Brown, S (1993). Asynchronous ovarian torsion. The case for prophylactic oopheropexy. Postgrad Med J 69, 318–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gugliemi, R, Galzavena, F, Pizzi, G B et al. (1980). Ovarian function after pelvic lymphnode irradiation. Eur J Gynecol Oncol 2, 99–107Google Scholar
Hallfeldt, K K, Trupka, A, Kalteis, T, Stuetzle, H (1999). Safe creation of pneumoperitoneum using an optical trocar. Surg Endosc 13, 306–307CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Handa, Y, Hoshi, N, Yamada, H et al. (1999). Tubal pregnancy in a unicornuate uterus with rudimentary horn: a case report. Fertil Steril 72, 354–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heinonen, P K (1983). Clinical implications of the unicornuate uterus with rudimentary horn. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 21, 145–150CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heinonen, P K (1997). Unicornuate and rudimentary horn. Fertil Steril 68, 224–230CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hope, R (1937). The differential diagnosis of ectopic gestation by peritoneoscopy. Surg Gynaecol Obstet 64, 229Google Scholar
Humphrey, G, Najmaldin, A (1994). Modification of Hasson's technique in paediatric laparoscopy. Br J Surg 81, 1319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurd, W W, Bude, R O, Lancey, J O, Newman, J S (1994). The location of abdominal wall blood vessels in relationship to abdominal landmarks apparent at laparoscopy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 171, 642–646CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jacobson, T Z, Barlow, D H, Garry, R, Koninckx, P (2001). Laparoscopic surgery for pelvic pain associated with endometriosis (Cochrane Review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4, CD001300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarrett, J C II (1990). Laparoscopy: direct trocar insertion without pneumoperitoneumObstet Gynecol 75, 725–727Google ScholarPubMed
Jones, K D, Sutton, C J (2002). The ovarian endometrioma: why is it so poorly managed? Indicators from an anonymous survey. Hum Reprod 17, 845–849CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kadir, R A, Hart, J, Nagele, F, O'Connor, H, Magos, A L (1996). Laparoscopic excision of a noncommunicating rudimentary uterine horn. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 103, 371–372CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koh, C H, Janik, G M (1999). Laparoscopic microsurgery: current and future status. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 11, 401–407CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krasna, I H, Lee, M I, Smilour, P, Sciorra, L, Eirman, L (1992). Risk of malignancy in bilateral streak gonads: The role of the Y-chromosome. J Pediatr Surg 27, 1376–1380CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kriplani, A, Relan, S, Mittal, S, Buckslee, K (1995). Pre-rupture diagnosis and management of rudimentary horn pregnancy in the first trimester. Eur J Obstet Gynaecol Reprod Biol 58, 203–205CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, C-L, Wang, C-J, Liu, Y-H, Yen, C-F, Lai, Y-L, Soong, Y K (1999). Laparoscopically assisted full thickness graft for reconstruction in congenital agenesis of vagina and uterine cervix. Hum Reprod 14, 928–930CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lushbaugh, C C, Casarett, G W (1976). The effects of gonadal irradiation in clinical radiation therapy: a review. Cancer 37, 1111–11203.0.CO;2-E>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Luzzatto, C, Midrio, P, Toffolutti, T, Suma, V (2000). Neonatal ovarian cysts: management and follow up. Paediatr Surg Int 16, 56–59CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mahmood, T A, Templeton, A (1990). The impact of treatment on the natural history of endometriosis. Hum Reprod 5, 965–970CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCarthy, E (1999). A case report and review of pregnancies in rudimentary noncommunicating uterine horns. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynecol 39, 188–190CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McIndoe, A (1950). The treatment of congenital absence and obliterative condition of vagina. Br J Plast Surg 2, 254–267Google Scholar
Meirow, D, Fasouliotis, S J, Nugent, D, Schenker, J G, Gosdon, R G, Rutherford, A J (1999). A laparoscopic technique for obtaining ovarian cortical biopsy specimens for fertility conservation in patients with cancer. Fertil Steril 71, 948–951CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moen, M H (1995). Why do women develop endometriosis and why is it diagnosed?Hum Reprod 10, 8–11CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mohammed, A, Jibril, A, Youngson, G (1998). Laparoscopic management of a large ovarian cyst in the neonate. Surg Endosc 12, 1272–1274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montz, F J, Holschneider, C H, Munro, M G (1994). Incisional hernia following laparoscopy: a survey of the American Association of Gynecologists and Laparosiopists. Obstet Gynecol 84, 881–884Google Scholar
Nahum, G G (1997). Rudimentary uterine horn pregnancy. A case report on surviving twins delivered eight days apart. J Reprod Med 42, 525–532Google ScholarPubMed
Najmaldin A, Grousseau D (1999). Basic Technique. In Endoscopic Surgery in Children, Bax N M A, Georgeson K E, Najmaldin A S, Valla J S, eds., pp. 14–34. Springer Verlag, BerlinCrossRef
Najmaldin A, Guillou P (1998). A Guide to Laparoscopic Surgery. Najmaldin A, Guillou P, eds. Blackwell Science, London
Neely, M R, McWilliams, R, Makhlouf, H A (1975). Laparoscopy: routine pneumoperitoneum via the posterior fornix. Obstet Gynecol 45, 459–460Google ScholarPubMed
Nezhat, C R and Smith, K S (1999). Laparoscopic management of unicornuate uterus with two cavitated, non-communicating rudimentary horns. Hum Reprod 14, 1965–1968CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nezhat, F, Nezhat, C, Bess, O, Nezhat, C H (1994). Laparoscopic amputation of a noncommunicating rudimentary horn after a hysteroscopic diagnosis: a case study. Surg Laparosc Endosc 2, 155–156Google Scholar
O'Connor, H, Magos, A (1996). Endometrial resection for the treatment of menorrhagia. N Engl J Med 335, 151–156CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Olive, D L, Henderson, D Y (1987). Endometriosis and Mullerian abnormalities. Obstet Gynecol 69, 412–415Google Scholar
Olsen, M M, Caldamore, A A, Jackson, C L et al. (1988). Gonadoblastoma in infancy: indications for early gonadectomy in 46XY gonadal dysgenesis. J Pediatr Surg 23, 270–271CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ota, H, Tanaka, J-I, Murakami, M et al. (2000). Laparoscopy-assisted Ruge procedure for the creation of a neo-vagina in a patient with Mayer—Rokitanski—Kuster—Hauser syndrome. Fertil Steril 73, 641–644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pasic, R, Levine, R L, Wolf, W M Jr (1999). Laparoscopy in morbidly obese patients. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 6, 307–312CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pasini, A, Alfieri, L, Belloni, C (2001). Spontaneous ectopic contralateral pregnancy with unicornuate uterus. A case report. Minerva Ginecol 53, 215–218Google ScholarPubMed
Perrotin, F, Betrand, J, Body, G (1999). Laparoscopic surgery of unicornuate uterus with rudimentary horn. Hum Reprod 14, 931–933CrossRefGoogle Scholar
*Redwine, D B (1991). Conservative laparoscopic excision of endometriosis by sharp dissection: life table analysis of reoperation and persistent or recurrent disease. Fertil Steril 56, 628–634CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raheja, S K, McDonald, P J, Taylor, I (1990). Nonspecific abdominal pain: an expensive mystery. J Roy Soc Med 88, 10–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rock, J A, Schlaff, W D (1985). The obstetric consequences of uterovaginal anomalies. Fertil Steril 43, 681–691Google ScholarPubMed
Rosenfield, R L, Lucky, A W, Allen, T D (1980). The diagnosis and management of intersex. Curr Probl Pediatr 10, 1–66CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ruge, E (1914). Ersatz der vagina durch die flexur mittels laparotomie. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 40, 120–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rutherford, A J, Gosdon, R G (1999). Ovarian tissue cryopreservation: a practical option?Acta Paediatr Suppl 88, 13–18CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salky, B A (1988). The role of laparoscopy in the diagnosis and treatment of abdominal pain syndrome. Surg Endosc 12, 911–914CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sapin, E, Bargy, F, Lewin, F et al. (1994). Management of ovarian cyst detected by prenatal ultrasounds. Eur J Pediatr Surg 4, 137–140CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Semm, K (1970). Weitere Entwicklungen in der gynäkologischen Laparoskopie-Gynäkologische Pelviskopie. Klin Frauenheilk Geburt 1, 326–329Google Scholar
Shalet, S M, Beardwell, C G, Morris-Jones, P H, Pearson, D, Orrell, D H (1976). Ovarian failure following abdominal irradiation in childhood. Br J Cancer 33, 655–658CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shellhas, H F (1974). Malignant potential of dysgenetic gonad. Obstet Gynecol 44, 298–309Google Scholar
Silber, C G, Magness, R L, Farber, M (1990). Duplication of the uterus with a noncommunicating functioning uterine horn. Mt Sinai J Med 57, 374–377Google ScholarPubMed
Soong, Y K, Chang, F H, Lee, C L, Lai, Y M (1994). Vaginal agenesis treated by laparoscopically assisted neovaginoplasty. Gynecol Endosc 3, 217–220Google Scholar
*Soong, Y K, Chang, F H, Lai, Y M, Lee, C L, Chou, H H (1996). Results of modified laparoscopically assisted neovaginoplasty in 18 patients with congenital absence of vagina. Hum Reprod 11, 200–203CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
String, A, Berber, E, Foroutani, A, Macho, J R, Pearl, J M, Siperstein, A E (2001). Use of the optical access trocar for safe and rapid entry in various laparoscopic procedures. Surg Endosc 15, 570–573CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tabata, M, Ichineok, , Sakuragi, N, Shina, Y, Yamaguchi, T, Mabuchi, Y (1987). Incidence of ovarian metastasis in patients with cancer of the uterine cervix. Gynecol Oncol 28, 255–261CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Templeman, C L, Hertweck, S P, Levine, R L, Reich, H (2000). Use of laparoscopically mobilised peritoneum in the creation of a neovagina. Fertil Steril 74, 589–592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thibaud, E, Ramirez, M, Brauner, R et al. (1992). Presentation of ovarian function by ovarian transposition performed before pelvic irradiation during childhood. J Pediatr 121, 880–885CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linden, P J, (1996). Theories on the pathogenesis of endometriosis. Hum Reprod 11(Suppl 3), 53–65CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Niekerk, W A (1976). True hermaphroditism: an analytic review with a report of 3 new cases. Am J Obstet Gynecol 126, 890–907CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vecchietti, G (1965). Neovagina nella sindrome di Rokitansky—Kuster—Hauser. Attual Obstet Ginecol 11, 131–147Google Scholar
Vermesh, M, Silva, P D, Rosen, G F, Stein, A L, Fossum, G T, Sauer, M V (1989). Management of unruptured ectopic gestation by linear salpingostomy: a prospective, randomized clinical trial of laparoscopy versus laparotomy. Obstet Gynecol 73, 400–404Google ScholarPubMed
Vernon, M W, Beard, J S, Graves, K, Wilson, E A (1986). Classification of endometriotic implants by morphologic appearance and capacity to synthesize prostaglandin F. Fertil Steril 46, 801–806CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Veronikis, D K, McClure, G B, Nichols, D H (1997). The Vecchietti operation for constructing a neovagina, indications, instrumentation, and techniques. Obstet Gynecol 90, 301–304CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eye Corleta, H, Villodre, L C, Reis, R, Capp, E (2001). Conservative treatment for a noncommunicating rudimentary uterine horn. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 80, 668CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rokitansky, C (1860). Ueber uterusdrusenneubildung in Uterus and Ovarilsarcomen. Z Gesellschaft Aerzte Wien (van der Linden PJ) 37, 577–593Google Scholar
Waldschmidt, J, Schier, F (1992). Laparoscopical surgery in neonates and infants. Eur J Pediatr Surg 1: 145–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfe, W M, Pasic, R (1990). Transuterine insertion of Veress needle in laparoscopy. Obstet Gynecol 75, 456–457Google ScholarPubMed
Yahata, T, Kurabayashi, T, Ueda, H, Kodama, S, Chihara, T, Tanaka, K (1998). Laparoscopic management of rudimentary horn pregnancy: a case report. J Reprod Med 43, 223–226Google ScholarPubMed
Yoo, E H, Chun, S H, Woo, B H (1999). Laparoscopic resection of a rudimentary horn pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 78, 167–168Google ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×