Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-r5zm4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-05T02:00:47.918Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

13 - HYSTERECTOMY

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 December 2009

Camran Nezhat
Affiliation:
Stanford University School of Medicine, California
Farr Nezhat
Affiliation:
Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York
Ceana Nezhat
Affiliation:
Nezhat Medical Center, Atlanta
Get access

Summary

The number of hysterectomies, a frequently practiced major surgical procedure, varies between different regions and cultures of the world. It reflects differences in health care systems, education, and psychosocial attitudes. The highest rates of hysterectomy are found in the United States and Australia (36% and 40%, respectively) and the lowest in Italy (15.5%) and France (8.5%).

INDICATIONS

Most hysterectomies are performed for leiomyomas, uterine prolapse, endometriosis, and gynecologic cancer. The number of hysterectomies for endometriosis doubled between 1965 and 1984, exceeding the increase observed for any other indication and probably reflecting an increased recognition of endometriosis. Other indications are abnormal uterine bleeding, pelvic infection and its sequelae, ovarian tumors, and complications of pregnancy. These indications account for 15% to 21% of all hysterectomies.

About 75% of all hysterectomies are done abdominally and 25% vaginally. The vaginal approach is primarily used for uterine prolapse. Abdominal hysterectomy is usually done for women with significant pelvic disease, such as endometriosis or pelvic adhesions, which can make a vaginal removal more difficult (Table 13.1.1). Compared to those having a vaginal hysterectomy, women having an abdominal operation have more febrile morbidity, receive more blood transfusions, and have a longer postoperative hospitalization and convalescence. If more women had a vaginal rather than an abdominal approach for their hysterectomy, therapeutic, economic, and social benefits would result.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×