Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-tn8tq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-07T23:39:53.434Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 November 2021

Giuseppe Martinico
Affiliation:
Scuola Universitaria Superiore Sant’Anna (Pisa)
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Filtering Populist Claims to Fight Populism
The Italian Case in a Comparative Perspective
, pp. 186 - 211
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bibliography

Abromeit, J., ‘A Critical Review of Recent Literature on Populism’, Politics and Governance, No. 4, 2017, 177Google Scholar
Abts, K., Rummens, S., ‘Populism versus Democracy’, Political Studies, No. 2, 2007, 405Google Scholar
Albert, R., Constitutional Amendments: Making, Breaking, and Changing Constitutions, Oxford University Press, 2019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albert, R., Contiades, X., Fotiadou, A. (eds.), The Foundations and Traditions of Constitutional Amendment, Hart, Oxford, 2017Google Scholar
Albertazzi, D., ‘Going, Going,… Not Quite Gone Yet? Bossi’s Lega and the Survival of the Mass Party’, Contemporary Italian Politics, No. 2, 2016, 115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albertazzi, D., Giovannini, A., Seddone, A., ‘“No Regionalism Please, We Are Leghisti!” The Transformation of the Italian Lega Nord under the Leadership of Matteo Salvini’, Regional and Federal Studies, No. 5, 2018, 645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albertazzi, D., McDonnell, D., Populists in Power, Routledge, Abingdon, 2015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alemanno, A., Lobbying for Change: Find Your Voice to Create a Better Society, Icon Books, London, 2017Google Scholar
Alterio, A. M., ‘Reactive vs Structural Approach: A Public Law Response to Populism’, Global Constitutionalism, No. 2, 2019, 270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amoroso, D., ‘Italy’, in Palombino, F. (ed.), Duelling for Supremacy International Law vs. National Fundamental Principles, Cambridge University Press, 2019, 184Google Scholar
Anastasia, S., Anselmi, M., ‘Penal Populism in the Multi-populist Context of Italy’, in Blokker, P., Anselmi, M. (eds.), Multiple Populisms: Italy as Democracy’s Mirror, Routledge, Abingdon, 2020, 164Google Scholar
Anderson, B., Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism, Verso, London, 1983Google Scholar
Anselmi, M., Populism: An Introduction, Routledge, Abingdon, 2018Google Scholar
Arato, A., ‘How We Got Here? Transition Failures, Their Causes, and the Populist Interest in the Constitution’, 2017, https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3116219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arato, A., ‘Political Theology and Populism’, Political Theology, No. 1, 2013, 143Google Scholar
Arditi, B., ‘On the Political: Schmitt contra Schmitt’, Telos, No. 142, 2008, 7Google Scholar
Arditi, B., ‘Populism as a Spectre of Democracy: A Response to Canovan’, Political Studies, No. 1, 2004, 135Google Scholar
Arendt, H., The Origins of Totalitarianism, Harcourt, Brace and Co., New York, 1951Google Scholar
Atikcan, E. Ö., ‘The Puzzle of Double Referendums in the European Union’, Journal of Common Market Studies, No. 5, 2015, 937Google Scholar
Auer, A., ‘L’esperienza del referendum in Svizzera e negli Stati Uniti’, in Luciani, M., Volpi, M. (eds.), Referendum, Laterza, Rome, 1992, 61Google Scholar
Avbelj, M., ‘The Right Question about the FCC Ultra Vires Decision’, 2020, https://verfassungsblog.de/the-right-question-about-the-fcc-ultra-vires-decisionGoogle Scholar
Azzariti, G., ‘Cittadini, partiti e gruppi parlamentari: esiste ancora il divieto di mandato imperativo?’, in Associazione italiana dei costituzionalisti (ed.), Partiti politici e società civile a sessant’anni dall’entrata in vigore della Costituzione, Jovene, Naples, 2009, 177Google Scholar
Baldassarre, A., ‘Il “referendum” costituzionale’, Quaderni costituzionali, No. 2, 1994, 235Google Scholar
Baldassarri, M., ‘The Resilient Governance of the EU: Towards a Post-democratic Society’, in Baldassarri, M., Castelli, E., Truffeli, M., Vezzani, G. (eds.), Anti-Europeanism Critical Perspectives Towards the European Union, Springer, Berlin, 2020, 77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baraggia, A. (ed.), ‘The Aftermath of the Italian General Election of March 4’, 2018, https://bit.ly/3gLwjQKGoogle Scholar
Baraggia, A., Martinico, G., ‘Who Is the Master of the Treaties? The Compact Theory in Karlsruhe’, Diritti Comparati, 2020, www.diritticomparati.it/who-is-the-master-of-the-treaties-the-compact-theory-in-karlsruhe/Google Scholar
Barber, N., ‘Populist Leaders and Political Parties’, German Law Journal, special issue 2, 2019, 129Google Scholar
Barbera, A., Morrone, A. , La Repubblica dei referendum, Il Mulino, Bologna, 2003Google Scholar
Barra Caracciolo, L., Euro e (o?) democrazia costituzionale. La convivenza impossibile tra costituzione e trattati europei, Dike Giuridica Editrice, Rome, 2013Google Scholar
Bassini, M., ‘Rise of Populism and the Five Star Movement Model: An Italian Case Study’, Italian Journal of Public Law, No. 1, 2018, 302Google Scholar
Bassini, M., ‘Rise of Populism and the Five Star Movement Model: An Italian Case Study’, in Delledonne, G., Martinico, G., Monti, M., Pacini, F. (eds.), Italian Populism and Constitutional Law: Strategies, Conflicts and Dilemmas, Palgrave, London, 2020, 216Google Scholar
Battini, M., The Missing Italian Nuremberg, Palgrave, London, 2007Google Scholar
Becchi, P., Italia sovrana, Sperling & Kupfer, Milan, 2018Google Scholar
Becchi, P., Manifesto sovranista: per la liberazione dei popoli europei, Giubilei Regnani, Cesena, 2019Google Scholar
Becchi, P., Colpo di Stato permanente: Cronache degli ultimi tre anni, Marsilio, Venice, 2014.Google Scholar
Becchi, P., Palma, G. , Dalla Seconda alla Terza Repubblica. Come nasce il governo Lega-M5S, Paesi edizioni, Rome, 2018Google Scholar
Betlem, G., Nollkaemper, A., ‘Giving Effect to Public International Law and European Community Law Before Domestic Courts. A Comparative Analysis of the Practice of Consistent Interpretation’, European Journal of International Law, No. 3, 2003, 569Google Scholar
Betti, E., Teoria generale della interpretazione, Vol. II, Giuffrè, Milan, 1955Google Scholar
Bettinelli, E., ‘Itinerari della razionalizzazione della convenzione antireferendaria’, Politica del diritto, No. 5, 1978, 513Google Scholar
Betzu, M., Ciarlo, P., Deffenu, A., ‘Per il mantenimento del quorum strutturale nel referendum abrogativo’, 2018, https://bit.ly/2TaCgySGoogle Scholar
Biagi, F., ‘Plebiscite’, The Max Planck Encyclopedia of Comparative Constitutional Law, 2017, https://oxcon.ouplaw.com/view/10.1093/law-mpeccol/law-mpeccol-e414Google Scholar
Biancalana, C., ‘Four Italian Populisms’, in Blokker, P., Anselmi, M. (eds.), Multiple Populisms: Italy as Democracy’s Mirror, Routledge, Abingdon, 2020, 216Google Scholar
Biancalana, C. (ed.), Disintermediazione e nuove forme di mediazione. Verso una democrazia post-rappresentativa?, Feltrinelli, Milan, 2018Google Scholar
Bianco, G., ‘The New Financial Stability Mechanisms and Their (Poor) Consistency with EU Law’, EUI RSCAS 2012/44, 2012, http://cadmus.eui.eu/handle/1814/23428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bickel, A., The Least Dangerous Branch, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT, 1986Google Scholar
Bickerton, C., Invernizzi Accetti, C., ‘Populism and Technocracy’, in Rovira Kaltwasser, C., Taggart, P., Ochoa Espejo, P., Ostiguy, P. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Populism, Oxford University Press, 2017, 330Google Scholar
Bignami, F., EU Law in Populist times, Cambridge University Press, 2019Google Scholar
Biondi Dal Monte, F. , Fontanelli, F., ‘The Decisions No. 348 and 349/2007 of the Italian Constitutional Court: The Efficacy of the European Convention in the Italian Legal System’, German Law Journal, No. 7, 2008, 889Google Scholar
Blanchard, M., ‘Review: Mimesis, Not Mimicry’, Comparative Literature, No. 2, 1997, 176Google Scholar
Blokker, P., ‘Populism and Constitutional Reform. The Case of Italy’, in Delledonne, G., Martinico, G., Monti, M., Pacini, F. (eds.), Italian Populism and Constitutional Law: Strategies, Conflicts and Dilemmas, Palgrave, London, 2020, 11Google Scholar
Blokker, P., ‘Populism as a Constitutional Project’, International Journal of Constitutional Law, No. 2, 2019, 537Google Scholar
Blokker, P., ‘“Vote Yes for a Safe Italy” or “Vote No to Defend the Constitution”: Italian Constitutional Politics between Majoritarianism and Civil Resistance’, 2016, https://verfassungsblog.de/italy-constitution-referendum-renzi-blokker/Google Scholar
Blokker, P., Anselmi, M., ‘Introduction’, in Blokker, P., Anselmi, M. (eds.), Multiple Populisms: Italy as Democracy’s Mirror, Routledge, Abingdon, 2020, 1Google Scholar
Blokker, P., Anselmi, M. (eds.), Multiple Populisms: Italy as Democracy’s Mirror, Routledge, Abingdon, 2020Google Scholar
Bobbio, N., Contro i nuovi dispotismi: scritti sul berlusconismo, Rome, Dedalo, 2008Google Scholar
Bobbio, N., Il futuro della democrazia, Einaudi, Turin, 1984Google Scholar
Bobbio, N., ‘Sul fondamento dei diritti dell’uomo’, in Bobbio, N., L’età dei diritti, Einaudi, Turin, 1997, 5Google Scholar
Bobek, M., Kosař, D., ‘Report on the Czech Republic and Slovakia’, in Martinico, G., Pollicino, O. (eds.), The National Judicial Treatment of the ECHR and EU Laws: A Comparative Constitutional Perspective, Europa Law Publishing, Groningen, 2010, 133Google Scholar
Bogdandy, A., Sonnevend, P. (eds.), Constitutional Crisis in the European Constitutional Area. Theory, Law and Politics in Hungary and Romania, C. H. Beck-Hart-Nomos, Oxford, 2015Google Scholar
Bogdanor, V., The People and the Party System: The Referendum and Electoral Reform in British Politics, Cambridge University Press, 1981Google Scholar
Boom, S. J., ‘The European Union after the Maastricht Decision: Will Germany Be the Virginia of Europe’, American Journal of Comparative Law, No. 2, 1995, 177Google Scholar
Bordignon, F., ‘Matteo Renzi: A “Leftist Berlusconi” for the Italian Democratic Party?’, South European Society and Politics, No. 1, 2014, 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bressanelli, E., Natali, D. (eds.), Contemporary Italian Politics, special issue on Italian politics, No. 3, 2019Google Scholar
Brettschneider, C., ‘Popular Constitutionalism contra Populism’, Constitutional Commentary, No. 1, 2015, 81Google Scholar
Breuer, M. (ed.), Principled Resistance to ECtHR Judgments – A New Paradigm?, Springer, Berlin, 2019Google Scholar
Brubaker, R., ‘Why Populism?’, Theory and Society, No. 5, 2017, 357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruno, F., ‘I giuristi alla Costituente: l’opera di Costantino Mortati’, in De Siervo, U. (ed.), Scelte della Costituente e cultura giuridica. II: Protagonisti e momenti del dibattito costituzionale, Il Mulino, Bologna, 1980, 59Google Scholar
Bryce, J., ‘Flexible and Rigid Constitution’, in Bryce, J., Studies in History and Jurisprudence, Vol. I, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1901, 124Google Scholar
Buratti, A., Fioravanti, M. (eds.), Costituenti ombra. Altri luoghi e altre figure della cultura politica italiana (1943-48), Carocci, Rome, 2010Google Scholar
Burke, E., ‘Speech to the Electors of Bristol’, 3 November 1774, https://press-pubs.uchicago.edu/founders/documents/v1ch13s7.htmlGoogle Scholar
Butler, D., Ranney, A. (eds.), Referendums Around the World: The Growing Use of Direct Democracy, AEI press, Washington, DC, 1994Google Scholar
Calamandrei, P., ‘Cenni introduttivi sulla Costituente e i suoi lavori’, in Calamandrei, P., Levi, A. (eds.), Commentario sistematico alla Costituzione italiana, Barbèra, G., Florence, 1950, lxxxixGoogle Scholar
Calamandrei, P., ‘La Costituzione e le leggi per attuarla’, in AA.VV., Dieci anni dopo: 1945-1955, Laterza, Bari, 1955, now in Opere giuridiche, Vol. III, Morano, Naples, 1965, 553Google Scholar
Calamandrei, P., Scritti e discorsi politici, Vol. II, La Nuova Italia, Florence, 1966Google Scholar
Calamo Specchia, M., ‘Quale disciplina referendaria nel Regno Unito? Brevi note su di un approccio sistematico per un modello a-sistematico’, in Torre, A., Frosini, J. (eds.), Democrazia rappresentativa e referendum nel Regno Unito, Maggioli, Rimini, 2012, 146Google Scholar
Calhoun, J. C., A Disquisition on Government, 1849, http://praxeology.net/JCC-DG.htmGoogle Scholar
Calise, M., Il partito personale. I due corpi del leader, Laterza, Rome, 2007Google Scholar
Canovan, M., The People, Polity, Oxford, 2005Google Scholar
Canovan, M., ‘Populism for Political Theorists?’, Journal of Political Ideologies, No. 3, 2004, 241Google Scholar
Canovan, M, Populism, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Oxford, 1981Google Scholar
Canovan, M., ‘Trust the People! Populism and the Two Faces of Democracy’, Political Studies, No. 1, 1999, 2Google Scholar
Carboni, G., ‘I referendum mai realizzati e ancora da realizzare’, in Torre, A., Frosini, J. (eds.), Democrazia rappresentativa e referendum nel Regno Unito, Maggioli, Rimini, 2012, 399Google Scholar
Carnevale, P., Chinni, D., ‘To Be or Not to Be (Online)? Qualche considerazione sul rapporto fra web e organi costituzionali’, 2019, www.giurcost.org/LIBERAMICORUM/carnevale&chinni_scrittiCostanzo.pdfGoogle Scholar
Carré de Malberg, R. , ‘Considérations théoriques sur la question de la combinaison du referendum avec le parlementarisme’, in Annuaire de l’Institut international de droit public, Vol. II, PUF, Paris, 1931, 272Google Scholar
Carreira da Silva, F., Brito Vieira, M., ‘Populism as a Logic of Political Action’, European Journal of Social Theory, No. 4, 2019, 497Google Scholar
Carrozza, P., ‘Nazione’, in Digesto discipline pubblicistiche, Vol. X, UTET, Turin, 1995, 126Google Scholar
Carrozza, P., ‘Constitutionalism’s Post-modern Opening’, in Loughlin, M., Walker, N. (eds.), The Paradox of Constitutionalism: Constituent Power and Constitutional Form, Oxford University Press, 2007, 169Google Scholar
Carrozza, P., ‘È solo una questione di numeri? Le proposte di riforma degli artt. 56 e 57 Cost. per la riduzione dei parlamentari’, Diritto pubblico comparato ed europeo, special issue, 2019, 88Google Scholar
Cartabia, M., ‘La ratifica del trattato costituzionale europeo e la volontà costituente degli Stati membri’, 2004, www.forumcostituzionale.itGoogle Scholar
Cartabia, M., ‘The Italian Constitution as a Revolutionary Agreement’, in Albert, R. (ed.), Revolutionary Constitutionalism: Law, Legitimacy, Power, Hart, Oxford, 2020, 313Google Scholar
Cartabia, M., Principi inviolabili e integrazione europea, Giuffrè, Milan, 1995Google Scholar
Cartabia, M., Weiler, J. H. H, L’Italia in Europa, Il Mulino, Bologna, 2000Google Scholar
Casaleggio, G., Insultatemi!, Adagio eBook, Milan, 2013Google Scholar
Cassese, A., ‘Politica estera e relazioni internazionali nel disegno emerso alla Assemblea Costituente’, in de Siervo, U. (ed.), Scelte della Costituente e cultura giuridica. I: Costituzione italiana e modelli stranieri, Il Mulino, Bologna, 1980, 505Google Scholar
Cassese, A., ‘Modern Constitutions and International Law’, Recueil des Cours, 1985, 331Google Scholar
Cassina Wolff, E., ‘CasaPound Italia: “Back to Believing. The Struggle Continues”’, Fascism, No. 1, 2019, 61Google Scholar
Caterina, E., ‘L’attuazione del metodo democratico all’interno dei partiti politici: analisi della normativa vigente e spunti per una legge sui partiti’, Democrazia e diritto, No. 3, 2016, 61Google Scholar
Chalmers, D., Davies, G., Monti, G., European Union Law: Cases and Materials, Cambridge University Press, 2010Google Scholar
Cheli, E., ‘Il problema storico della Costituente’, Politica del diritto, No. 4, 1973, 485Google Scholar
Chiarelli, R., ‘Il populismo nella Costituzione italiana’, in Chiarelli, R. (ed.), Il populismo tra storia, politica e diritto, Rubettino, Soveria Mannelli, 2015, 177Google Scholar
Choudhry, S., ‘Civil War, Ceasefire, Constitution: Some Preliminary Notes’, Cardozo Law Review, No. 5, 2012, 1907Google Scholar
Ciancio, A., ‘Il quorum di partecipazione nel referendum abrogativo. (Causa ed effetti di un anacronismo)’, Politica del diritto, No. 4, 1999, 676Google Scholar
Ciaurro, L., ‘Art. 67’, in Bifulco, R., Celotto, A., Olivetti, M. (eds.), Commentario alla Costituzione, Vol. II, UTET, Turin, 2006, 1289Google Scholar
Citrigno, A.M., Moschella, D., ‘Quale futuro per il divieto di mandato imperativo?’, 2018, http://bpr.camera.it/bpr/allegati/show/CDBPR17-1932Google Scholar
Cloots, E., National Identity in EU Law, Hart, Oxford, 2015Google Scholar
Closa, C., ‘A Critique of the Theory of Democratic Secession’, in Closa, C., Margiotta, C., Martinico, G. (eds.), Between Democracy and Law: The Amorality of Secession, Routledge, Abingdon, 2019, 49Google Scholar
Closa, C., Kochenov, D. (eds.), Reinforcing Rule of Law Oversight in the European Union, Cambridge University Press, 2016Google Scholar
Cocco, M., Qualunquismo. Una storia politica e culturale dell’uomo qualunque, Le Monnier, Florence, 2018Google Scholar
Colón-Ríos, J., Weak Constitutionalism: Democratic Legitimacy and the Question of Constituent Power, Routledge, Abingdon, 2012Google Scholar
Corrias, L., ‘Populism in a Constitutional Key: Constituent Power, Popular Sovereignty and Constitutional Identity’, European Constitutional Law Review, No. 1, 2016, 6Google Scholar
Corso, L., ‘Populismo, limiti al potere e giudici costituzionali. Una lezione americana’, Ragion pratica, No. 1, 2019, 211Google Scholar
Corso, L., ‘What Does Populism Have to Do with Constitutional Law? Discussing Populist Constitutionalism and Its Assumptions’, Rivista di Filosofia del Diritto, No. 2, 2014, 443Google Scholar
Corso, L., ‘When Anti-Politics Becomes Political: What Can the Italian Five Star Movement Tell Us about the Relationship Between Populism and Legalism’, European Constitutional Law Review, No. 3, 2019, 462Google Scholar
Cortelazzo, M. A., ‘Le parole della neopolitica – Salvo intese’, 2019, www.treccani.it/magazine/lingua_italiana/articoli/parole/Neopolitica14.htmlGoogle Scholar
Cragin, T., Salsini, L. A., Resistance, Heroism, Loss World War II in Italian Literature and Film, Rowman and Littlefield, Lanham, 2018Google Scholar
Crisafulli, V., Nocilla, D., ‘Nazione’, in Enciclopedia del diritto, Vol. XXVII, Giuffrè, Milan, 1977, 814Google Scholar
Crisafulli, V., ‘Partiti, Parlamento, Governo’, in Crisafulli, V., Stato Popolo Governo. Illusioni e delusioni costituzionali, Giuffrè, Milan, 1985, 209Google Scholar
Croce, B., Per una nuova Italia. Scritti e discorsi (1943-44), Ricciardi, Naples, 1944Google Scholar
Culik, J., ‘Hungary’s invalid refugee referendum dents Viktor Orbán’s anti-EU “revolution”’, 2016, https://theconversation.com/hungarys-invalid-refugee-referendum-dents-viktor-orbans-anti-eu-revolution-66424Google Scholar
Curreri, S., Democrazia e rappresentanza politica. Dal divieto di mandato al mandato di partito, Firenze University Press, Florence, 2004Google Scholar
Damele, G., ‘Vincoli di mandato dei parlamentari e carattere democratico dei partiti. Spunti a partire dall’articolo 160 della Costituzione portoghese’, 2017, www.forumcostituzionale.it/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/damele.pdfGoogle Scholar
Damiani, M., ‘Citizen Democracy: New Politics in New Participation Models’, in Blokker, P., Anselmi, M. (eds.), Multiple Populisms: Italy as Democracy’s Mirror, Routledge, Abingdon, 2019, 181Google Scholar
Dani, M., Menéndez, A. J., ‘Soft-Conditionality through Soft-Law: le insidie nascoste del Pandemic Crisis Support’, 2020, www.lacostituzione.info/index.php/2020/05/10/soft-conditionality-through-soft-law-le-insidie-nascoste-del-pandemic-crisis-support/Google Scholar
Dani, M., Mendes, J., Menéndez, A. J., Wilkinson, M., Schepel, H., Chiti, E., At the End of the Law. A Moment of Truth for the Eurozone and the EU, 2020, https://verfassungsblog.de/at-the-end-of-the-lawGoogle Scholar
Dann, P., Engelhardt, M., ‘The Global Administrative Order Through a German Lens: Perception and Influence of Legal Structures of Global Governance in Germany’, German Law Journal, No. 7, 2011, 1371Google Scholar
De Blasio, E., Sorice, M., ‘Technopopulism and Direct Representation’, in Blokker, P., Anselmi, M. (eds.), Multiple Populisms: Italy as Democracy’s Mirror, Routledge, Abingdon, 2020, 127Google Scholar
de Cleen, B., ‘Populism and Nationalism’, in Rovira Kaltwasser, C., Taggart, P., Ochoa Espejo, P., Ostiguy, P. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Populism, Oxford University Press, 2017, 342Google Scholar
De Felice, R., Mussolini l’alleato. Vol. I. L’Italia in guerra, 1940-1943. Tomo I: Dalla guerra ‘breve’ alla guerra lunga, Einaudi, Turin, 1990Google Scholar
De Felice, R., Mussolini l’alleato. Vol. II. L’Italia in guerra 1940-1943. Tomo II: Crisi e agonia del regime, Einaudi, Turin, 1990Google Scholar
De Felice, R., Mussolini l’alleato. Vol. III. La guerra civile 1943-1945, Einaudi, Turin, 1997Google Scholar
De Felice, R., Mussolini il duce. Vol. I: Gli anni del consenso, 1929-1936, Einaudi, Turin, 1974Google Scholar
De Felice, R., Mussolini il duce. Vol. II: Lo stato totalitario 1936-1940, Einaudi, Turin, 1981Google Scholar
De Felice, R., Mussolini il fascista. Vol. I: La conquista del potere, 1921-1925, Einaudi, Turin, 1966Google Scholar
De Felice, R., Mussolini il fascista. Vol. II: L’organizzazione dello stato fascista, 1925-1929, Einaudi, Turin, 1968Google Scholar
De Felice, R., Mussolini il rivoluzionario, 1883-1920, Einaudi, Turin, 1965Google Scholar
De Fiores, C., ‘Sulla rappresentazione della Nazione. Brevi note sul divieto di mandato imperativo’, Diritto e società, No. 1, 2017, 19Google Scholar
Degryse, C., ‘The New European Economic Governance’, Working Paper European Trade Union Institute, 2012/14, 2012, www.etui.org/Publications2/Working-Papers/The-new-European-economic-governanceGoogle Scholar
Delfino, F., ‘La democrazia “illiberale”: il modello di democrazia “sovrana” in Russia e di democrazia “cristiana” in Ungheria. Origini, similitudini e divergenze’, Nuovi Autoritarismi e Democrazie (NAD), No. 2, 2019, 1Google Scholar
Delledonne, G., ‘Un’anomalia italiana? Una riflessione comparatistica sul numero dei parlamentari negli altri ordinamenti’, in Rossi, E. (ed.), Meno parlamentari, più democrazia? Significato e conseguenze della riforma costituzionale, Pisa University Press, 2020, 55Google Scholar
Delledonne, G., ‘Populism and Government: Continuity and Paradoxes in the Yellow-Green Experiment’, in Delledonne, G., Martinico, G., Monti, M., Pacini, F. (eds.), Italian Populism and Constitutional Law: Strategies, Conflicts and Dilemmas, Palgrave, London, 2020, 135Google Scholar
Delledonne, G., ‘La Resistenza in Assemblea costituente e nel testo costituzionale italiano del 1948’, Historia Constitucional, No. 1, 2009, 217Google Scholar
Del Vecchio, G., ‘Les bases du droit comparé et les principes généraux du droit’, Revue internationale de droit comparé, No. 3, 1960, 493Google Scholar
De Nardis, F., ‘Depoliticization, Anti-politics and the Moral People’, in Blokker, P., Anselmi, M. (eds.), Multiple Populisms: Italy as Democracy’s Mirror, Routledge, Abingdon, 2020, 49Google Scholar
De Petris, A., ‘Programs, Strategies and Electoral Campaigns of the Five Stars Movement in Italy. A Brand New Party Model or an “Anti-Party” State of Mind?’, in De Petris, A., Poguntke, T. (eds.), Anti-Party Parties in Germany and Italy, Luiss University Press, Rome, 2015, 125Google Scholar
De Spiegeleire, S., Skinner, C., Sweijs, T., ‘The Rise of Populist Sovereignism: What It Is, Where It Comes From and What It Means for International Security and Defense’, The Hague Centre for Strategic Studies (HCSS), 2017, https://bit.ly/3jqPeDeGoogle Scholar
de Vergottini, G., Diritto costituzionale, Cedam, Padua, 2004Google Scholar
De Witte, B., ‘Using International Law in the Euro Crisis: Causes and Consequences’, ARENA Working Paper, 4/2013, www.sv.uio.no/arena/english/research/publications/arena-working-papers/2013/wp4-13.pdfGoogle Scholar
Diamanti, I., La lega. Geografia, storia e sociologia di un nuovo soggetto politico, Donzelli, Rome, 1993Google Scholar
Diamanti, I., Lazar, M. , Popolocrazia. La metamorfosi delle nostre democrazie, Laterza, Rome, 2018Google Scholar
Dicey, A. V., Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution, St. Martin’s Press, New York, 1959Google Scholar
Dicey, A. V., ‘Ought the Referendum to be Introduced into England?’, Contemporary Review, No. 3, 1890Google Scholar
Dicey, A. V., ‘The Parliament Act 1911 and the Destruction of All Constitutional Safeguards’, in Anson, W., Smith, F. E., de Broke, W. (eds.), Rights of Citizenship: A Survey of Safeguards for the People, Frederick Warne, London, 1912, 81Google Scholar
Di Chiara, A., ‘Due prassi costituzionalmente discutibili: delibere del Governo “salvo intese” e pubblicazione tardiva dei decreti legge’, Osservatorio sulle fonti, No. 1, 2019, 1Google Scholar
Di Cosimo, G., ‘Fonti normative del Governo: molti problemi e tre modi per affrontarli’, Osservatorio sulle fonti, No. 3, 2016, 1Google Scholar
Di Federico, G., L’identità nazionale degli stati membri nel diritto dell’Unione europea. Natura e portata dell’art. 4, par. 2, TUE, Editoriale Scientifica, Naples, 2017Google Scholar
Di Giovine, A., Democrazia diretta e sistema politico, Cedam, Padua, 2001Google Scholar
Di Giovine, A., ‘Referendum e responsabilità politica’, Diritto Pubblico Comparato ed Europeo, No. 3, 2005, 1214Google Scholar
Di Gregorio, A., ‘La Russia e le elezioni europee’, 2019, www.federalismi.it/nv14/articolo-documento.cfm?Artid=38721Google Scholar
Di Marzio, F., La politica e il contratto. Dalla affermazione dei valori alla negoziazione degli interessi, Donzelli, Rome, 2018Google Scholar
Donovan, M., Gilbert, M., ‘Silvio Berlusconi and Romano Prodi’, in Jones, E., Pasquino, G. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Italian Politics, Oxford University Press, 2015, 394Google Scholar
Doyle, O., ‘Populist Constitutionalism and Constituent Power’, German Law Journal, special issue 2, 2019, 161Google Scholar
Dugin, A., The Fourth Political Theory, Arktos, London, 2012, 196Google Scholar
Dumberry, P., ‘The Secession Question in Quebec’, Diritto pubblico comparato ed europeo, No. 2, 2015, 357Google Scholar
Dumbrovsky, T., ‘Federal Solution to the EU Internal Sovereignty Conundrum: The European Doctrine of the Czech Constitutional Court and the U.S. Compact Theory’, in Tichy, L., Dumbrovsky, T. (eds.), Sovereignty and Competences of the European Union, Charles University, Prague, 2010, 80Google Scholar
Dworkin, R., Taking Rights Seriously, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1977Google Scholar
Eco, U., ‘Ur-Fascism’, The New York Review, 22 June 1995, www.nybooks.com/articles/1995/06/22/ur-fascism/Google Scholar
Elchardus, M., Spruyt, B., ‘Populism, Persistent Republicanism and Declinism: An Empirical Analysis of Populism as a Thin Ideology’, Government and Opposition, No. 1, 2016, 111Google Scholar
Elia, L., ‘La commissione dei 75, il dibattito costituzionale e l’elaborazione dello schema di costituzione’, in AA.VV., Il parlamento italiano 1861-1988, Vol. XIV, Nuova Cei, Milan, 1989, 128Google Scholar
Elia, L., ‘Governo (forme di)’, in Enciclopedia del Diritto, Vol. XIX, Giuffé, Milan, 1970, 657Google Scholar
Elkins, Z., Ginsburg, T., Melton, J., The Endurance of National Constitutions, Cambridge University Press, 2009Google Scholar
Ellwood, D. W., L’alleato nemico. La politica dell’occupazione, Feltrinelli, Milan, 1977Google Scholar
Elster, J., ‘Constitution-Making and Violence’, Journal of Legal Analysis, No. 1, 2012, 7Google Scholar
Esposito, C., ‘I partiti nella Costituzione italiana’, in Esposito, C., La Costituzione italiana. Saggi, Cedam, Padua, 1954, 215Google Scholar
European Commission for Democracy through Law (Venice Commission), ‘Report on Democracy, Limitation of Mandates and Incompatibility of Political Functions’, 2013, www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/default.aspx?pdffile=CDL-AD(2012)027rev-eGoogle Scholar
European Commission for Democracy through Law (Venice Commission), ‘Report on the Imperative Mandate and Similar Practices’, 2009, www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/default.aspx?pdffile=CDL-AD(2009)027-eGoogle Scholar
Fabbrini, F., Pollicino, O., ‘Constitutional Identity in Italy: Institutional Disagreements at a Time of Political Change’, in Calliess, C., van der Schyff, G. (eds.), Constitutional Identity in a Europe of Multilevel Constitutionalism, Cambridge University Press, 2019, 201Google Scholar
Faraguna, P., ‘Unamendability and Constitutional Identity in the Italian Constitutional Experience’, European Journal of Law Reform, No. 3, 2019, 329Google Scholar
Fasone, C., ‘Constitutional Courts Facing the Euro Crisis. Italy, Portugal and Spain in a Comparative Perspective’, Max Weber Programme MWP 2014/25, 2014, cadmus.eui.eu/bitstream/handle/1814/33859/MWP_WP_2014_25.pdfGoogle Scholar
Fasone, C., ‘Is There a Populist Turn in the Italian Parliament? Continuity and Discontinuity in the Non-legislative Procedures’, in Delledonne, G., Martinico, G., Monti, M., Pacini, F. (eds.), Italian Populism and Constitutional Law: Strategies, Conflicts and Dilemmas, Palgrave, London, 2020, 41Google Scholar
Fasone, C., ‘Quale è la fonte più idonea a recepire le novità del Trattato di Lisbona sui parlamenti nazionali?’, Osservatorio sulle Fonti, No. 3, 2010, 1Google Scholar
Fenazzi, S., ‘Per M5S, quello svizzero è il “modello faro” di democrazia diretta’, 2016, www.swissinfo.ch/ita/ballottaggi-sindaci-in-italia_per-m5s-quello-svizzero-%C3%A8-il-modello-faro-di-democrazia-diretta/42239748Google Scholar
Fenoglio, B., Johnny the Partisan, Quartet Books, London, 1995Google Scholar
Filippetta, G., L’estate che imparammo a sparare. Storia partigiana della Costituzione, Feltrinelli, Milan, 2018Google Scholar
Finchelstein, F., From Fascism to Populism in History, University of California Press, Oakland, 2018Google Scholar
Fioravanti, M., ‘Aspetti del costituzionalismo giacobino. La funzione legislativa nell’acte constitutionnel del 24 giugno 1793’, Historia del constitucionalismo, No. 1, 2016, 123Google Scholar
Fishkin, J. S., Democracy and Deliberation: New Directions for Democratic Reform, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT, 1991Google Scholar
Floridia, A., Vignati, R., ‘Deliberativa, diretta o partecipativa? Le sfide del Movimento 5 stelle alla democrazia rappresentativa’, Quaderni di sociologia, No. 65, 2014, https://journals.openedition.org/qds/369Google Scholar
Focardi, F., La rimozione delle colpe della seconda guerra mondiale, Laterza, Rome, 2013Google Scholar
Fois, S., ‘Il referendum come “contropotere” e garanzia nel sistema costituzionale italiano’, in Bettinelli, E., Boneschi, L. (eds.), Referendum, ordine pubblico, Costituzione, Bompiani, Milan, 1978, 130Google Scholar
Foley, M., The Silence of Constitutions: Gaps, ‘Abeyances’, and Political Temperament in the Maintenance of Government, Routledge, Abingdon, 1989Google Scholar
Fontana, A., ‘L’evoluzione storica del mandato imperativo, dal medioevo allo Statuto albertino’, in Caretti, P., Morisi, D., Tarli Barbieri, G. (eds.), Il divieto di mandato imperativo: un principio in discussione, Seminario di studi e ricerche parlamentari ‘Silvano Tosi’, Florence, 2019, 324Google Scholar
Forcellese, T., ‘L’uomo qualunque. L’idea dello “Stato amministrativo” alla Costituente’, in Buratti, A., Fioravanti, M. (eds.), Costituenti ombra. Altri luoghi e altre figure della cultura politica italiana (1943-48), Carocci, Rome, 2010, 445Google Scholar
Fournier, T., ‘From Rhetoric to Action: A Constitutional Analysis of Populism’, German Law Journal, No. 3, 2019, 362Google Scholar
Freeden, M., ‘After the Brexit Referendum: Revisiting Populism as an Ideology’, Journal of Political Ideologies, No. 1, 2017, 1Google Scholar
Fusaro, D., Glebalizzazione. La lotta di classe al tempo del populismo, Rizzoli, Milan, 2019Google Scholar
Galli, C., Sovranità, Il Mulino, Bologna, 2019Google Scholar
Gallie, W. B., ‘Essentially Contested Concepts’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, No. 1, 1956, 16Google Scholar
Galston, W., Anti-Pluralism: The Populist Threat to Democracy, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT, 2018Google Scholar
Gargarella, R., Latin American Constitutionalism, 1810-2010: The Engine Room of the Constitution, Oxford University Press, 2013Google Scholar
Gatti, C., I demoni di Salvini. I postnazisti e la Lega Milano, Chiarelettere, Milan, 2019Google Scholar
Gentile, E., Chi è fascista? Gli italiani stanno tornando a essere fascisti?, Laterza, Rome, 2019Google Scholar
Gentile, E., ‘Le silence de Hannah Arendt: L’interprétation du fascisme dans Les origines du totalitarisme’, Revue d’histoire moderne et contemporaine, 2008, 11Google Scholar
Gerards, J., ‘The Irrelevance of the Netherlands Constitution, and the Impossibility of Changing It’, Revue interdisciplinaire d’études juridiques, No. 2, 2016, 207Google Scholar
Gerbaudo, P., The Digital Party: Political Organisation and Online Democracy, Pluto Press, London, 2019Google Scholar
Germino, D. E., The Italian Fascist Party in Power: A Study in Totalitarian Rule, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, 1959Google Scholar
Ghisalberti, C., Storia costituzionale d’Italia 1848-1994, Laterza, Rome, 2020Google Scholar
Giacché, V., ANSCHLUSS. L’annessione: L’unificazione della Germania e il futuro dell’Europa, Imprimatur, Reggio Emilia, 2013Google Scholar
Giacché, V., Costituzione italiana contro trattati europei. Il conflitto inevitabile, Imprimatur, Reggio Emilia, 2015Google Scholar
Giannini, G., La folla. Seimila anni di lotta contro la tirannide, Il Faro, Rome, 1945Google Scholar
Gianniti, L., Lupo, N., ‘Le conseguenze della riduzione dei parlamentari sui Regolamenti di Senato e Camera’, Quaderni costituzionali, No. 3, 2020, 559Google Scholar
Ginsburg, T., Simpser, A. (eds.), Constitutions in Authoritarian Regimes, Cambridge University Press, 2014Google Scholar
Ginsburg, T., Huq, A. Z., How to Save a Constitutional Democracy, Chicago University Press, 2018Google Scholar
Ginsburg, T., Lansberg-Rodriguez, D., Versteeg, M., ‘When to Overthrow Your Government: The Right to Resist in the World’s Constitutions’, UCLA Law Review, No. 5, 2013, 1184Google Scholar
Giuliani, A., ‘Le disposizioni sulla legge in generale. Gli articoli da 1 a 15’, in Rescigno, P. (ed.), Trattato di diritto privato. Premesse e disposizioni preliminari, Vol. I, UTET, Turin, 1999, 379Google Scholar
Goldoni, M., ‘Rousseau’s Radical Constitutionalism and Its Legacy’, in Dowdle, M., Wilkinson, M. (eds.), Constitutionalism Beyond Liberalism, Cambridge University Press, 2017, 227Google Scholar
Gori, L., Le elezioni primarie nell’ordinamento costituzionale, ES, Naples, 2018Google Scholar
Grabenwarter, C., ‘Constitutional Resilience’, 2018, https://verfassungsblog.de/constitutional-resilience/Google Scholar
Graber, M., Levinson, S., Tushnet, M. (eds.), Constitutional Democracy in Crisis?, Oxford University Press, 2018Google Scholar
Grasso, G., ‘La balestra di Guglielmo Tell e l’iniziativa legislativa popolare. Note minime a proposito del disegno di legge costituzionale in materia di iniziativa legislativa popolare e di referendum’, 2019, https://bit.ly/3zzyUWtGoogle Scholar
Grasso, G., ‘Mandato imperativo e mandato di partito: il caso del MoVimento 5 Stelle’, 2017, www.osservatorioaic.it/images/rivista/pdf/Grasso%20Definitivo.pdfGoogle Scholar
Gregor, A. J., The Ideology of Fascism: The Rationale of Totalitarianism, Free Press, New York, 1969Google Scholar
Gregorio, M., Parte totale. Le dottrine costituzionali del partito politico in Italia tra Otto e Novecento, Giuffrè, Milan, 2013Google Scholar
Griglio, E., Lupo, N., ‘Parliamentary Democracy and the Eurozone Crisis’, Law and Economics Yearly Review, No. 2, 2012, 313Google Scholar
Grossi, P., A History of European Law, Blackwell, Malden, 2010Google Scholar
Grosso, E., ‘Democrazia diretta e democrazia rappresentativa nel pensiero di Norberto Bobbio’, 2015, https://bit.ly/2Sz4vHgGoogle Scholar
Guarino, G., ‘Il referendum e la sua applicazione al regime parlamentare’, Rassegna di diritto pubblico, No. 1, 1947, 30Google Scholar
Guarino, G., ‘The “Truth” about Europe and the Euro. A Second Essay’, Nomos. Le attualità del diritto, No. 2, 2014, 25Google Scholar
Guastini, R., Le fonti del diritto. Fondamenti teorici, Giuffrè, Milan, 2010Google Scholar
Guazzarotti, A., ‘Very Unkind Things about the German Constitutional Court’s Rebellion against the ECJ in the Quantitative Easing Case’, 2020, https://verfassungsblog.de/very-unkind-things-about-the-german-constitutional-courts-rebellion-against-the-ecj-in-the-quantitative-easing-case/Google Scholar
Hailbronner, M., Landau, D. (eds.), ‘Constitutional Courts and Populism’, 2018, www.iconnectblog.com/2017/04/introduction-constitutional-courts-and-populism/Google Scholar
Halmai, G., ‘Abuse of Constitutional Identity. The Hungarian Constitutional Court on Interpretation of Article E) (2) of the Fundamental Law’, Review of Central and East European Law, No. 1, 2018, 23Google Scholar
Halmai, G., ‘The Coup against Constitutional Democracy: The Case of Hungary’, 2018, https://me.eui.eu/gabor-halmai/wp-content/uploads/sites/385/2018/06/Chapter-15-Halmai-Hungary.pdfGoogle Scholar
Halmai, G., ‘Is There Such Thing as “Populist Constitutionalism”? The Case of Hungary’, Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences, No. 3, 2018, 323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayward, J., ‘The Populist Challenge to Élitist Democracy in Europe’, in Hayward, J. (ed.), Elitism, Populism, and European Politics, Oxford University Press, 1996, 10Google Scholar
Hazareesingh, S., ‘De Gaulle, le mythe napoléonien, et la consécration de la tradition consulaire républicaine’, Cahiers Jaurès, No. 3, 2008, 3Google Scholar
Henning, B., The End of Politicians: Time for a Real Democracy, Unbound Digital, Johnson City, 2017Google Scholar
Hewlett, N., ‘Nicolas Sarkozy and the Legacy of Bonapartism: The French Presidential and Parliamentary Elections of 2007’, Modern & Contemporary France, No. 4, 2007, 405Google Scholar
Heydt, C., Moral Philosophy in Eighteenth-Century Britain. God, Self, and Other, Cambridge University Press, 2017Google Scholar
Hofmann, H., Pégny, G., Sintomer, Y., ‘Le concept de représentation: un problème allemande?’, Raisons politiques, No. 2, 2013, 79Google Scholar
Holden, A. M., ‘The Imperative Mandate in the Spanish Cortes of the Middle Ages’, American Political Science Review, No. 4, 1930, 886Google Scholar
House of Lords, Select Committee on the Constitution 12th Report of Session 2009–10, Referendums in the United Kingdom. Report with Evidence, 2010, www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200910/ldselect/ldconst/99/99.pdfGoogle Scholar
Howse, R., ‘Epilogue: In Defense of Disruptive Democracy – A Critique of Anti-populism’, International Journal of Constitutional Law, No. 2, 2019, 641Google Scholar
Hüppauf, B., ‘Camouflage and Mimesis: The Frog between the Devil’s Deceptions, Evolutionary Biology, and the Ecological Animal’, Paragrana Internationale Zeitschrift für Historische Anthropologie, No. 1, 2015, 132Google Scholar
Independent High level Group on fake news and online disinformation, ‘A multi-dimensional approach to disinformation. Report of the independent High level Group on fake news and online disinformation’, 2018, https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/6ef4df8b-4cea-11e8-be1d-01aa75ed71a1Google Scholar
Jakab, A., ‘What Can Constitutional Law Do against the Erosion of Democracy and the Rule of Law? On the Interconnectedness of the Protection of Democracy and the Rule of Law’, Constitutional Studies, special issue, 2020, 5Google Scholar
Jakab, A., Schweber, H., ‘Editorial: Constitutional Decline, Constitutional Design, and Lawyerly Hubris’, Constitutional Studies, special issue, 2020, 1Google Scholar
Jakab, A., Kochenov, D. (eds.), The Enforcement of EU Law and Values, Oxford University Press, 2017Google Scholar
Jones, E., ‘Not Hamilton but Madison: Diversity Makes for a Better Union’, 2020, www.iiss.org/blogs/survival-blog/2020/05/europe-diversity-politics-covid-19Google Scholar
Kahn-Freund, O., ‘On Uses and Misuses of Comparative Law’, Modern Law Review, No. 1, 1974, 1Google Scholar
Kelemen, R. D., Pech, L., ‘Why Autocrats Love Constitutional Identity and Constitutional Pluralism. Lessons from Hungary and Poland’, Reconnect Working Paper, No. 2, 2018, https://reconnect-europe.eu/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/RECONNECT-WorkingPaper2-Kelemen-Pech-LP-KO.pdfGoogle Scholar
Keller, H., Stone Sweet, A. (eds.), A Europe of Rights: The Impact of the ECHR on National Legal Systems, Oxford University Press, 2009Google Scholar
Kelsen, H., General Theory of Law and State, Russell and Russell, New York, 1945Google Scholar
Kelsen, H., ‘On the Essence and Value of Democracy’, in Jacobson, A. J., Schlink, B. (eds.), Weimar: A Jurisprudence of Crisis, University of California Press, Berkeley, 2000, 84Google Scholar
Kelsen, H., Vom Wesen und Wert der Demokratie, Mohr, Tübingen, 1929 (Italian translation, Essenza e valore della democrazia, Giappichelli, Turin, 2004)Google Scholar
Kosař, D., Sipulova, K., ‘How to Fight Court-Packing?’, Constitutional Studies, No. 1, 2020, 133Google Scholar
Kramer, L., The People Themselves: Popular Constitutionalism and Judicial Review, Oxford University Press, 2004Google Scholar
Krastev, I., After Europe, University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, 2017Google Scholar
Krastev, I., ‘“Sovereign Democracy”, Russian-Style’, Insight Turkey, No. 4, 2006, 113Google Scholar
Kriesi, H., ‘The Populist Challenge’, West European Politics, No. 2, 2014, 361Google Scholar
Krisch, N., Beyond Constitutionalism: The Pluralist Structure of Postnational Law, Oxford University Press, 2010Google Scholar
Krugman, P., End This Depression Now!, W. W. Norton & Company, New York, 2012Google Scholar
Kuo, M. S., ‘Against Instantaneous Democracy’, International Journal of Constitutional Law, No. 2, 2019, 554Google Scholar
Laclau, E., On Populist Reason, Verso, London, 2005Google Scholar
Landau, D., ‘Abusive Constitutionalism’, UC Davis Law Review, No. 1, 2013, 189Google Scholar
Landau, D., ‘Populist Constitutions’, The University of Chicago Law Review, No. 5, 2018, 521Google Scholar
Landemore, H., ‘We, All of the People. Five Lessons from Iceland’s Failed Experiment in Creating a Crowdsourced Constitution’, 2014, https://slate.com/technology/2014/07/five-lessons-from-icelands-failed-crowdsourced-constitution-experiment.htmGoogle Scholar
Lasorella, G., ‘Aggiornamenti e sviluppi in tema di programmazione dei lavori, tra decreti-legge e maggioranze variabili’, in Lippolis, V., Lupo, N. (eds.), Il Parlamento dopo il referendum costituzionale (Il Filangieri. Quaderno 2015-2016), Jovene, Naples, 2017, 53Google Scholar
Ledeen, M., ‘Renzo De Felice and the Controversy over Italian Fascism’, Journal of Contemporary History, No. 4, 1976, 269Google Scholar
Lefort, C., Democracy and Political Theory, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, 1988Google Scholar
Legrand, P., ‘The Impossibility of Legal Transplants’, Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, No. 1, 1997, 111Google Scholar
Leibholz, G., Das Wesen der Repräsentation und der Gestaltwandel der Demokratie im 20. Jahrhundert, De Gruyter, Berlin, 1966 [1929]Google Scholar
Lewis, D., Direct Democracy and Minority Rights: A Critical Assessment of the Tyranny of the Majority in the American States, Routledge, Abingdon, 2013Google Scholar
Leyland, P., ‘Referendums, Popular Sovereignty, and the Territorial Constitution’, in Rawlings, R., Leyland, P., Young, A. (eds.), Sovereignty and the Law, Oxford University Press, 2013, 145Google Scholar
Linz, J., Totalitarian and Authoritarian Regimes, Lynne Rienner, Boulder, CO, 2000Google Scholar
Lijphart, A., ‘Consociational Democracy’, World Politics, No. 2, 1969, 207Google Scholar
Livingston, A., ‘Was the Fascist Era Really a “Parenthesis” for the Italian Legal System?’, in Skinner, S. (ed.), Fascism and Criminal Law: History, Theory, Continuity, Hart, Oxford, 2015, 85Google Scholar
Livingston, L., ‘Understanding Hungary’s Authoritarian Response to the Pandemic’, 2020, www.lawfareblog.com/understanding-hungarys-authoritarian-response-pandemicGoogle Scholar
Loewenstein, K., ‘Militant Democracy and Fundamental Rights, I’, American Political Science Review, No. 3, 1937, 417Google Scholar
Loewenstein, K., ‘Militant Democracy and Fundamental Rights, II’, American Political Science Review, No. 4, 1937, 638Google Scholar
Lollini, A., Palermo, F., ‘Comparative Law and the “Proceduralization” of Constitution-Building Processes’, in Raue, J., Sutter, P. (eds.), Facets and Practices of State-building, Martinus Nijoff, Leiden, 2009, 301Google Scholar
Longo, E., Malvicini, M., ‘Il decisionismo governativo: uso e abuso dei poteri normativi del Governo durante la crisi da COVID-19’, 2020, www.federalismi.it/nv14/articolo-documento.cfm?Artid=44237Google Scholar
Loo, A., ‘John C. Calhoun’s Concurrent Majority’, 2016, theprincetontory.com/john-c-calhouns-concurrent-majority/Google Scholar
Louis, J. V., ‘The Review of the Stability and Growth Pact’, Common Market Law Review, No. 1, 2006, 85Google Scholar
Luciani, M., ‘Antifascismo e nascita della costituzione’, Politica del diritto, No. 2, 1991, 191Google Scholar
Luciani, M., ‘L’antisovrano e la crisi delle costituzioni’, Rivista di diritto costituzionale, No. 1, 1996, 124Google Scholar
Luciani, M., Commentario della Costituzione. Art. 75 Referendum, Zanichelli, Bologna, 2005Google Scholar
Luciani, M., ‘Introduzione’, in Luciani, M., Volpi, M. (eds.), Referendum, Laterza, Rome, 1992, 3Google Scholar
Luciani, M., ‘Il referendum: questioni teoriche e dell’esperienza italiana’, Revista catalana de dret públic, No. 2, 2008, 157Google Scholar
Lupo, N., ‘“Populismo legislativo?”: continuità e discontinuità nelle tendenze della legislazione italiana’, Ragion pratica, No. 1, 2019, 251Google Scholar
Lupo, N., ‘Perché non él’art. 64 Cost. a impedire il voto “a distanza” dei parlamentari. E perché ammettere tale voto richiede una “re-ingegnerizzazione” dei procedimenti parlamentari’, 2020, www.osservatorioaic.it/images/rivista/pdf/2020_3_02_Lupo.pdf.Google Scholar
Madison, J., ‘The Structure of the Government Must Furnish the Proper Checks and Balances Between the Different Departments’, 1788, www.constitution.org/fed/federa51.htmGoogle Scholar
Malvicini, M., Lauri, G., ‘Le commissioni parlamentari di inchiesta: recenti sviluppi e osservazioni alla luce della prassi’, 2016, https://bit.ly/36bVbMpGoogle Scholar
Manconi, L., Graziani, F., Per il tuo bene ti mozzerò la testa. Contro il giustizialismo morale, Einaudi, Turin, 2020Google Scholar
Manin, B., The Principles of Representative Government, Cambridge University Press, 2010Google Scholar
Manucci, L., ‘Populism and the Media’, in Rovira Kaltwasser, C., Taggart, P., Ochoa Espejo, P., Ostiguy, P. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Populism, Oxford University Press, 2017, 467Google Scholar
Mansbridge, J. J., Beyond Adversary Democracy, Basic Books, New York, 1980Google Scholar
Manucci, L., Amsler, M., ‘Where the Wind Blows: Five Star Movement’s Populism, Direct Democracy and Ideological Flexibility’, Italian Political Science Review / Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica, No. 1, 2018, 109Google Scholar
Maranini, G., Governo parlamentare e partitocrazia: lezione inaugurale dell’anno accademico 1949-1950, Editrice Universitaria, Florence, 1950Google Scholar
Marchlewska, M., Cichocka, A., Panayiotou, O., Castellanos, K., Batayneh, J., ‘Populism as Identity Politics: Perceived In-Group Disadvantage, Collective Narcissism, and Support for Populism’, Social Psychological and Personality Science, No. 2, 2018, 151Google Scholar
Martinelli, C., ‘Libero mandato e rappresentanza nazionale come fondamenti della modernità costituzionale’, 2018, www.federalismi.it/nv14/articolo-documento.cfm?Artid=36456Google Scholar
Martinico, G., ‘Constitutionalism, Resistance, and Openness: Comparative Law Reflections on Constitutionalism in Postnational Governance’, Yearbook of European Law, 2016, 318Google Scholar
Martinico, G., ‘National Courts and Judicial Disobedience to the ECHR: A Comparative Overview’, in Arnardóttir, O. M., Buyse, A. (eds.), Shifting Centres of Gravity in Human Rights Protection: Rethinking Relations between the ECHR, EU, and National Legal Orders, Routledge, Abingdon, 2016, 59Google Scholar
Martinico, G., ‘Resentment, Populism and Political Strategies in Italy’, 2019, https://verfassungsblog.de/resentment-populism-and-political-strategies-in-italy/Google Scholar
Martinico, G., Lo spirito polemico del diritto europeo. Studio sulle ambizioni costituzionali dell’Unione, Aracne, Rome, 2011Google Scholar
Martinico, G., The Tangled Complexity of the EU Constitutional Process: The Frustrating Knot of Europe, Routledge, Abingdon, 2012Google Scholar
Martinico, G., Repetto, G., ‘Fundamental Rights and Constitutional Duels in Europe: An Italian Perspective on Case 269/2017 of the Italian Constitutional Court and Its Aftermath’, European Constitutional Law Review, No. 4, 2019, 731Google Scholar
Martinico, G., Pollicino, O., The Interaction between Europe’s Legal Systems: Judicial Dialogue and the Creation of Supranational Laws, Elgar, Cheltenham, 2012Google Scholar
Marzal, T., ‘Is the BVerfG PSPP Decision “Simply Not Comprehensible”? A Critique of the Judgment’s Reasoning on Proportionality’, 2020, https://verfassungsblog.de/is-the-bverfg-pspp-decision-simply-not-comprehensible/Google Scholar
Mazzoleni, G., ‘Populism and the Media’, in Albertazzi, D., McDonnell, D. (eds.), Twenty-First Century Populism: The Spectre of Western European Democracy, Palgrave, London, 2008, 49Google Scholar
Mazzurri, J., ‘La genesi del divieto ex art. 67 Cost. nel periodo costituente e brevi note sulle vicende della norma nei principali tentativi di riforma della Carta’, in Caretti, P., Morisi, D., Tarli Barbieri, G. (eds.), Il divieto di mandato imperativo: un principio in discussione, Seminario di studi e ricerche parlamentari ‘Silvano Tosi’, Florence, 2019, 339Google Scholar
McDonnell, D., ‘Silvio Berlusconi’s Personal Parties: From Forza Italia to the Popolo della Libertà’, Political Studies, No. 1 suppl., 2013, 217Google Scholar
McDonnell, D., ‘A Weekend in Padania: Regionalist Populism and the Lega Nord’, Politics, No. 2, 2006, 126Google Scholar
Mendez, F., Mendez, M., Triga, V., Referendums and the European Union: A Comparative Inquiry, Cambridge University Press, 2014Google Scholar
Mendez, F., Mendez, M., Triga, V. (eds.), Referendums on EU Matters, Policy Department for Citizens’ Rights and Constitutional Affairs, European Parliament’s Committee on Constitutional Affairs, 2017, www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2017/571402/IPOL_STU(2017)571402_EN.pdfGoogle Scholar
Menéndez, A., ‘The Existential Crisis of the European Union’, German Law Journal, No. 5, 2013, 453Google Scholar
Mény, Y. (ed.), Les politiques du mimétisme institutionnel: la greffe et le rejet, L’Harmattan, Paris, 1993Google Scholar
Mény, Y., Surel, Y., ‘The Constitutive Ambiguity of Populism’, in Mény, Y., Surel, Y. (eds.), Democracies and the Populist Challenge, Palgrave, London, 2002, 1Google Scholar
Mény, Y., Surel, Y., Populismo e democrazia, Il Mulino, Bologna, 2004Google Scholar
Mesežnikov, G., Gyárfášová, O., Smilov, D. (eds.), Populist Politics and Liberal Democracy in Central and Eastern Europe, Institute for Public Affairs, Bratislava, 2008Google Scholar
Michel, H., Mirkine-Guetzévitch, B., Les idées politiques et sociales de la Résistance, Presses universitaires de France, Paris, 1954Google Scholar
Michelman, F., ‘Populist Natural Law (Reflections on Tushnet’s “Thin Constitution”)’, University of Richmond Law Review, No. 2, 2000, 461Google Scholar
Milward, A., The European Rescue of the Nation-State, University of California Press, Berkeley, 1992Google Scholar
Milza, P., ‘Mussolini entre fascisme et populisme’, Vingtième Siècle. Revue d’histoire, No. 56, 1997, 115Google Scholar
Mirkine-Guetzévitch, B., Les Nouvelles tendances du droit constitutionnel, Giard, Paris, 1931Google Scholar
Mirkine-Guetzévitch, B., ‘Le référendum et le parlementarisme dans les nouvelles constitutions européennes’, Annuaire de l’Institut international de droit public, Vol. II, PUF, Paris, 1931, 285Google Scholar
Mittelstraß, J., ‘Complexity, Reductionism, and Holism in Science and Philosophy of Science’, in Hösle, V. (ed.), Complexity and Analogy in Science: Theoretical, Methodological and Epistemological Aspects, Acta 22, Pontifical Academy of Sciences, Vatican City, 2014, www.pas.va/content/dam/accademia/pdf/acta22/acta22-mittelstrass.pdfGoogle Scholar
Mitterrand, F., Le Coup d’État permanent, Plon, Paris, 1965Google Scholar
Molier, G., Rijpkema, B., ‘Germany’s New Militant Democracy Regime: National Democratic Party II and the German Federal Constitutional Court’s “Potentiality” Criterion for Party Bans: Bundesverfassungsgericht, Judgment of 17 January 2017, 2 BvB 1/13, National Democratic Party II’, European Constitutional Law Review, No. 2, 2018, 394Google Scholar
Monti, M., ‘Italian Populism and Fake News on the Internet: A New Political Weapon in the Public Discourse’, in Delledonne, G, Martinico, G, Monti, M, Pacini, F (eds.), Italian Populism and Constitutional Law: Strategies, Conflicts and Dilemmas, Palgrave, London, 177Google Scholar
Morel, L., ‘Referendum’, in Rosenfeld, M., Sajó, A. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law, Oxford University Press, 2012, 502Google Scholar
Morelli, A., Rappresentanza politica e libertà del mandato parlamentare, ES, Naples, 2018Google Scholar
Morgan, E., Inventing the People: The Rise of Popular Sovereignty in England and America, W. W. Norton & Company, New York, 1989Google Scholar
Morrone, A., ‘L’iniziativa popolare propositiva: per una democrazia plebiscitaria contro la democrazia rappresentativa?’, 2018, www.federalismi.it/nv14/editoriale.cfm?eid=499Google Scholar
Mortati, C., Lezioni sulle forme di governo, Cedam, Padua, 1973Google Scholar
Mortati, C., ‘Relazione alla II Sottocommissione’, 1946, www.nascitacostituzione.it/05appendici/01generali/00/02/06-mortati.htmGoogle Scholar
Mosca, L., Vaccari, C., Valeriani, A., ‘How to Select Citizen Candidates: The Five Star Movement’s Online Primaries and Their Implications’, in De Petris, A., Poguntke, T. (eds.), Anti-Party Parties in Germany and Italy, Luiss University Press, Rome, 2015, 114Google Scholar
Mozzo, A., ‘Ascesa dei leader e presidenzializzazione dei governi: la corrosione della democrazia nasce dal “cuore” dello Stato’, 2020, www.opiniojuris.it/presidenzializzazione-ascesa-leader/#_ftn11Google Scholar
Mudde, C., ‘Are Populists Friends or Foes of Constitutionalism?’, 2013, www.fljs.org/content/are-populists-friends-or-foes-constitutionalismGoogle Scholar
Mudde, C., The Far Right Today, Polity Press, Cambridge, 2019Google Scholar
Mudde, C., ‘Populism: An Ideational Approach’, in Rovira Kaltwasser, C., Taggart, P., Ochoa Espejo, P., Ostiguy, P. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Populism, Oxford University Press, 2017, 27Google Scholar
Mudde, C., ‘The Populist Zeitgeist’, Government and Opposition, No. 4, 2004, 541Google Scholar
Müller, J. W., ‘Populism and Constitutionalism’, in Rovira Kaltwasser, C., Taggart, P., Ochoa Espejo, P., Ostiguy, P. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Populism, Oxford University Press, 2017, 590Google Scholar
Müller, J. W., What Is Populism?, University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, 2017Google Scholar
Musso, M., Maccaferri, M., ‘At the Origins of the Political Discourse of the 5-Star Movement (M5S): Internet, Direct Democracy and the “Future of the Past”’, Journal Internet Histories Digital Technology, Culture and Society, Nos. 1–2, 2018, 98Google Scholar
Negri, A., Insurgencies: The Constituent Power and the Modern State, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, 1999Google Scholar
Nelken, D., ‘Legitimate Suspicions? Berlusconi and the Judges’, Italian Politics, No. 1, 2002, 112Google Scholar
Nenni, P., Una battaglia vinta, Edizioni Leonardo, Rome, 1946Google Scholar
Nicolini, M., ‘Reforming the Territorial Constitution in Italy: Some Reflections on Durability and Change’, in Abels, G., Battke, J. (eds.), Regional Governance in the EU Regions and the Future of Europe, Elgar, Cheltenham, 2019, 106Google Scholar
Ochoa Espejo, P., ‘Populism and the Idea of The People’, in Rovira Kaltwasser, C., Taggart, P., Ochoa Espejo, P., Ostiguy, P. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Populism, Oxford University Press, 2017, 607Google Scholar
Oklopcic, Z., Beyond the People: Social Imaginary and Constituent Imagination, Oxford University Press, 2018Google Scholar
Olivetti, M., ‘Foreign Influences on the Italian Constitutional System’, Paper submitted to the 6th World Congress of the International Association of Constitutional Law, Santiago de Chile, 2004, www.researchgate.net/publication/281241329_Foreign_Influences_on_the_Italian_Constitutional_SystemGoogle Scholar
Onida, V., La Costituzione. La legge fondamentale della Repubblica, Il Mulino, Bologna, 2007Google Scholar
Oomen, B., ‘Strengthening Constitutional Identity Where There Is None: The Case of the Netherlands’, Revue interdisciplinaire d’études juridiques, No. 2, 2016, 235Google Scholar
Orrù, R., ‘Divieto di mandato imperativo e anti-defection laws: spunti di diritto comparato’, Diritto pubblico comparato ed europeo, No. 4, 2015, 1099Google Scholar
Orsina, G., Il berlusconismo: nella storia d’Italia, Marsilio, Venice, 2013Google Scholar
Pace, A., Il potere di inchiesta delle assemblee legislative: Saggi, Giuffrè, Milan, 1973Google Scholar
Pacini, F., ‘Dall’autorità della legge all’autorevolezza delle Assemblee’, Quaderni costituzionali, No.1, 2015, 9Google Scholar
Pacini, F., ‘Populism and Law-Making Process’, in Delledonne, G., Martinico, G., Monti, M., Pacini, F. (eds.), Italian Populism and Constitutional Law: Strategies, Conflicts and Dilemmas, Palgrave, London, 2020, 119Google Scholar
Painter, B. W. Jr., ‘Renzo De Felice and the Historiography of Italian Fascism’, American Historical Review, 1990, 391Google Scholar
Pajno, A., ‘Il rispetto dei vincoli derivanti dall’ordinamento comunitario come limite alla potestà legislativa nel nuovo Titolo V della Costituzione’, Le Istituzioni del federalismo, No. 5, 2003, 814Google Scholar
Paladin, L., ‘Costituzione, preleggi e codice civile’, Rivista di diritto civile, No. 1, 1993, 19Google Scholar
Paladin, L., Per una storia costituzionale dell’Italia repubblicana, Il Mulino, Bologna, 2004Google Scholar
Palermo, F., La forma di stato dell’Unione europea. Per una teoria costituzionale dell’integrazione sovranazionale, Cedam, Padua, 2005Google Scholar
Pallante, F., Contro la democrazia diretta, Einaudi, Turin, 2020Google Scholar
Palm, A., Barana, L., ‘Italy’s Migration Policy: A Self-Defeating Approach Spells Marginalisation in Europe’, 2019, www.iai.it/en/pubblicazioni/italys-migration-policy-self-defeating-approach-spells-marginalisation-europeGoogle Scholar
Palombella, G., ‘Illiberal, Democratic and Non-Arbitrary? Epicentre and Circumstances of a Rule of Law Crisis’, Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, No. 1, 2018, 5Google Scholar
Pansa, G., Il sangue dei vinti, Sperling & Kupfer, Milan, 2003Google Scholar
Pasquino, G., ‘The State of the Italian Republic’, Contemporary Italian Politics, No. 2, 2019, 195Google Scholar
Passarelli, G., Tuorto, D., Lega & Padania: storie e luoghi delle camicie verdi, Il Mulino, Bologna, 2012Google Scholar
Pasquino, G., Pelizzo, L., Parlamenti democratici, Il Mulino, Bologna, 2006Google Scholar
Patard, J., ‘Le référendum constitutionnel de Marine Le Pen: Moi présidente, je rétablirai la supériorité du droit national!’, 2017, www.lepetitjuriste.fr/referendum-constitutionnel-de-marine-pen-moi-presidente-retablirai-superiorite-droit-national/Google Scholar
Paterniti, F., ‘La riforma dell’art. 117, 1°Co. della Costituzione e le nuove prospettive dei rapporti tra ordinamento giuridico nazionale e Unione Europea’, Giurisprudenza costituzionale, No. 3, 2004, 2101Google Scholar
Pavone, C., A Civil War: A History of the Italian Resistance, Verso, London, 2013Google Scholar
Pazé, V., ‘Il populismo come antitesi della democrazia’, Teoria politica, No. 1, 2017, 111Google Scholar
Pegoraro, L., ‘Le categorie civilistiche e il parassitismo metodologico dei costituzionalisti nello studio del diritto comparato’, Annuario di diritto comparato e di studi legislativi, 2013, 305Google Scholar
Penasa, S., ‘The Italian Way to Migration: Was It “True” Populism? Populist Policies as Constitutional Antigens’, in Delledonne, G., Martinico, G., Monti, M., Pacini, F. (eds.), Italian Populism and Constitutional Law: Strategies, Conflicts and Dilemmas, Palgrave, London, 2020, 255Google Scholar
Perassi, T., La Costituzione e l’ordinamento internazionale, Giuffrè, Milan, 1952Google Scholar
Pereira Coutinho, F., ‘Report on Portugal’, in Martinico, G., Pollicino, O. (eds.), The National Judicial Treatment of the ECHR and EU Laws: A Comparative Constitutional Perspective, Europa Law Publishing, Groningen, 2010, 351Google Scholar
Pertici, A., ‘L’etica pubblica e la riforma sempre in-attesa del conflitto di interessi’, 2016, www.gruppodipisa.it/8-rivista/1-andrea-pertici-l-etica-pubblica-e-la-riforma-sempre-in-attesa-del-conflitto-di-interessiGoogle Scholar
Peters, A., ‘Compensatory Constitutionalism: The Function and Potential of Fundamental International Norms and Structures’, Leiden Journal of International Law, No. 3, 2006, 579Google Scholar
Pezzini, B., Rossi, S. (eds.), I giuristi e la Resistenza: Una biografia intellettuale del Paese, Franco Angeli, Milan, 2016Google Scholar
Pierdominici, L., The Mimetic Evolution of the Court of Justice of the EU: A Comparative Law Perspective, Palgrave, London, 2020Google Scholar
Pinelli, C., ‘The Formation of a Constitutional Tradition in Continental Europe since World War II’, European Public Law, No. 2, 2016, 257Google Scholar
Pinelli, C., ‘Libertà di mandato dei parlamentari e rimedi contro il Transfughismo’, 2018, www.federalismi.it/nv14/articolo-documento.cfm?Artid=36498Google Scholar
Pinelli, C., ‘I limiti generali alla potestà legislativa statale e regionale e i rapporti con l’ordinamento comunitario’, Il Foro italiano, No. 5, 2001, 194Google Scholar
Pinelli, C., ‘The Populist Challenge to Constitutional Democracy’, European Constitutional Law Review, No.1, 2011, 5Google Scholar
Pinelli, C., ‘The Rise of Populism and the Malaise of Democracy’, in Garben, S., Govaere, I., Nemitz, P. (eds.), Critical Reflections on Constitutional Democracy in the European Union, Hart, Oxford, 2019, 27Google Scholar
Pistorio, G., Maxi-emendamento e questione di fiducia. Sottotitolo. Contributo allo studio di una prassi illegittima, ES, Naples, 2018Google Scholar
Pizzorusso, A., La Costituzione ferita, Laterza, Rome, 1999Google Scholar
Pizzorusso, A., ‘Disp. XII’, in Branca, G., Pizzorusso, A. (eds.), Commentario della Costituzione, Zanichelli, Bologna, 1995, 198Google Scholar
Pizzorusso, A., I gruppi parlamentari come soggetti di diritto: pagine di un saggio giuridico, Pacini Mariotti, Pisa, 1969Google Scholar
Plotke, D., ‘Representation Is Democracy’, Constellations, No. 1, 1997, 19Google Scholar
Poiares Maduro, M., ‘Passion and Reason in European Integration’, 2010, https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1709950Google Scholar
Poiares Maduro, M., ‘Some Preliminary Remarks on the PSPP Decision of the German Constitutional Court’, 2020, https://verfassungsblog.de/some-preliminary-remarks-on-the-pspp-decision-of-the-german-constitutional-courtGoogle Scholar
Poiares Maduro, M., ‘Three Claims of Constitutional Pluralism’, in Abvelj, M., Komárek, J. (eds.), Constitutional Pluralism in the European Union and Beyond, Hart, Oxford, 2012, 67Google Scholar
Poli, E., Forza Italia: strutture, leadership e radicamento territoriale, Il Mulino, Bologna, 2001Google Scholar
Politi, F., ‘Il procedimento di revisione della Costituzione Repubblicana. La funzione di garanzia dell’art. 138 Cost. e il ricorso a procedimenti alternativi della forma di governo e tutela dei valori costituzionali’, in Baldini, V. (ed.), La Costituzione e la sua revisione, Pisa University Press, 2014, 87Google Scholar
Pollicino, O., L’allargamento ad est dell’Europa e rapporti tra Corti costituzionali e Corti europee. Verso una teoria generale dell’impatto interordinamentale del diritto sovranazionale?, Giuffrè, Milan, 2010Google Scholar
Pollicino, O., ‘The Italian Constitutional Court at the Crossroads between Constitutional Parochialism and Co-operative Constitutionalism. Judgments No. 348 and 349 of 22 and 24 October 2007’, European Constitutional Law Review, No. 2, 2008, 363Google Scholar
Pollicino, O., ‘Metaphors and Identity Based Narrative in Constitutional Adjudication: When Judicial Dominance Matters’, 2019, https://blog-iacl-aidc.org/2019-posts/2019/2/27/metaphors-and-identity-based-narrative-in-constitutional-adjudication-when-judicial-dominance-mattersGoogle Scholar
Polsby, N. W., ‘Legislatures’, in Greenstein, F. I., Polsby, N. W. (eds.), Handbook of Political Science, Vol. V, Addison-Wesley, Reading, 1975, 257Google Scholar
Popelier, P., Lambrecht, S., Lemmens, K. (eds.), Criticism of the European Court of Human Rights, Intersentia, Antwerp, 2016Google Scholar
Popović, D., Comparative Government, Elgar, Cheltenham, 2019Google Scholar
Principato, L., ‘Il divieto di mandato imperativo, da prerogativa regia a garanzia della sovranità assembleare’, 2012, www.rivistaaic.it/images/rivista/pdf/Principato.pdfGoogle Scholar
Putin, V., ‘Speech and the Following Discussion at the Munich Conference on Security Policy’, 2007, http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/transcripts/24034Google Scholar
Qvortrup, M., A Comparative Study of Referendums: Government by the People, Manchester University Press, 2002Google Scholar
Qvortrup, M., ‘Introduction: Theory, Practice and History’, in Qvortrup, M. (ed.), Referendums around the World, Palgrave, London, 2018, 1Google Scholar
Qvortrup, M., ‘Two Hundred Years of Referendums’, in Qvortrup, M. (ed.), Referendums around the World, Palgrave, London, 2018, 263Google Scholar
Ragazzoni, D., ‘“Particracy”: The Pre-populist Critique of Parties and Its Implications’, in Blokker, P., Anselmi, M. (eds.), Multiple Populisms: Italy as Democracy’s Mirror, Routledge, Abingdon, 2020, 86Google Scholar
Ragazzoni, D., ‘The Populist Leader’s Two Bodies: Bobbio, Berlusconi, and the Factionalization of Party Democracy’, Constellations, No. 3, 2020, 213Google Scholar
Raible, L., Trueblood, L., ‘The Swiss System of Referendums and the Impossibility of Direct Democracy’, 2017, https://bit.ly/3jv3pY7Google Scholar
Raniolo, F., ‘Forza Italia: A Leader with a Party’, South European Society and Politics, No. 3–4, 2006, 439Google Scholar
Raunio, T., Hix, S., ‘Backbenchers Learn to Fight Back: European Integration and Parliamentary Government’, West European Politics, No. 4, 2000, 142Google Scholar
Rescigno, G. U., ‘Prassi, regolarità, regole, convenzioni costituzionali, consuetudini costituzionali, consuetudini giuridiche di diritto pubblico’, Osservatorio sulle fonti, No. 2, 2018, 1Google Scholar
Revelli, M., Populismo 2.0, Einaudi, Turin, 2017Google Scholar
Ridola, P., ‘Divieto del mandato imperativo e pluralismo politico’, in Studi sulle fonti normative e altri temi di vario diritto in onore di Vezio Crisafulli, Vol. II, Cedam, Padua, 1985, 679Google Scholar
Ridola, P., ‘Partiti politici’, in Enciclopedia del diritto, Vol. XXXII, Giuffrè, Milan, 66Google Scholar
Rinaldi, E., ‘Divieto di mandato imperativo e disciplina dei gruppi parlamentari’, 2017, www.costituzionalismo.it/download/Costituzionalismo_201702_637.pdfGoogle Scholar
Rizzo, M., Il golpe europeo. I comunisti contro l’Unione, Baldini Castoldi Dalai, Milan, 2012Google Scholar
Robespierre, M., Discours sur le gouvernement représentatif, 1793 https://archive.org/details/discourssurlegou00robe/page/26/mode/2up (Italian translation, Sul governo rappresentativo, Manifestolibri, Rome, 1995)Google Scholar
Rodrik, D., ‘Why Does Globalization Fuel Populism? Economics, Culture, and the Rise of Right-Wing Populism’, 2020, https://drodrik.scholar.harvard.edu/publications/why-does-globalization-fuel-populism-economics-culture-and-rise-right-wingGoogle Scholar
Romboli, R., ‘Il referendum costituzionale nell’esperienza repubblicana e nelle prospettive di riforma dell’art. 138 Cost.’, in Pisaneschi, A., Violini, L. (eds.), Poteri, garanzie e diritti a sessanta anni dalla Costituzione: scritti per Giovanni Grottanelli de’ Santi, Giuffrè, Milan, 2007, 573Google Scholar
Rooduijn, M., ‘The Nucleus of Populism: In Search of the Lowest Common Denominator’, Government and Opposition, No. 4, 2014, 573Google Scholar
Rosa, F., ‘Art. 75’, in Clementi, F., Cuocolo, L., Rosa, F., Vigevani, G. E. (eds.), La Costituzione italiana, Vol. II, Il Mulino, Bologna, 2018, 116Google Scholar
Rosanvallon, P., Counterdemocracy: Politics in an Age of Distrust, Cambridge University Press, 2008Google Scholar
Rossi, E., ‘Il numero dei parlamentari in Italia, dallo Statuto albertino ad oggi’, in Rossi, E. (ed.), Meno parlamentari, più democrazia? Significato e conseguenze della riforma costituzionale, Pisa University Press, 2020, 17Google Scholar
Rousseau, J. J., Considérations sur le gouvernement de Pologne et sur sa réformation projetée, 1772, www.espace-rousseau.ch/f/textes/considerations_pologne.pdfGoogle Scholar
Rovira Kaltwasser, C., Taggart, P., Ochoa Espejo, P., Ostiguy, P., ‘Populism: An Overview of the Concept and the State of the Art’, in Rovira Kaltwasser, C., Taggart, P., Ochoa Espejo, P., Ostiguy, P. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Populism, Oxford University Press, 2017, 1Google Scholar
Roznai, Y., ‘Negotiating the Eternal: The Paradox of Entrenching Secularism in Constitutions’, Michigan State Law Review, No. 2, 2017, 253Google Scholar
Roznai, Y., Unconstitutional Constitutional Amendments: The Limits of Amendment Powers, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2017Google Scholar
Rubio Llorente, F., La forma del poder: estudios sobre la constitución, CEPC, Madrid, 2013Google Scholar
Ruggeri, A., ‘Dimensione europea della tutela dei diritti fondamentali e tecniche interpretative’, 2009, www.federalismi.it/nv14/articolo-documento.cfm?Artid=14806Google Scholar
Ruggeri, A., ‘Riforma del titolo V e giudizi di “comunitarietà” delle leggi’, 2007, www.associazionedeicostituzionalisti.it/dottrina/ordinamentieuropei/ruggeri.htmlGoogle Scholar
Rummens, S., ‘Populism as a Threat to Liberal Democracy’, in Rovira Kaltwasser, C., Taggart, P., Ochoa Espejo, P., Ostiguy, P. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Populism, Oxford University Press, 2017, 554Google Scholar
Ruotolo, M., ‘L’incidenza della Costituzione repubblicana sulla lettura dell’art. 12 delle preleggi’, in Cananzi, D. M., Righi, R. (eds.), Ontologia e analisi del diritto. Scritti per Gaetano Carcaterra, Giuffrè, Milan, 2012, 1297Google Scholar
Rusconi, G. E., Resistenza e postfascismo, Il Mulino, Bologna, 1995Google Scholar
Russo, A. M., ‘El Ordenamiento Regional Italiano En La Espiral Centralizadora De La Crisis: ¡Todo Cambia Para Que Nada Cambie!’, Cuadernos Manuel Giménez Abad, No. 6, 2013, 9Google Scholar
Russo, F., ‘Government Formation in Italy: The Challenge of Bicameral Investiture’, in Rasch, B. E., Martin, S., Cheibub, J. A. (eds.), Parliaments and Government Formation: Unpacking Investiture Rules, Oxford University Press, 2015, 136Google Scholar
Sadursky, W., Poland’s Constitutional Breakdown, Oxford University Press, 2019Google Scholar
Sagan, E., Citizens & Cannibals: The French Revolution, the Struggle for Modernity, Rowman and Littlefield, Lanham, MD, 2001Google Scholar
Saiz Arnaiz, A., La apertura constitucional al derecho internacional y europeo de los derechos humanos. El artículo 10.2 de la Constitución Española, Centro de Estudios Políticos y Constitucionales, Madrid, 1999Google Scholar
Sajó, A., ‘Emotions in Constitutional Design’, International Journal of Constitutional Law, No. 3, 2010, 354Google Scholar
Sajò, A., ‘From Militant Democracy to the Preventive State’, Cardozo Law Review, No. 5, 2006, 2255Google Scholar
Salvadori, M., Democrazia. Storia di un’idea tra mito e realtà, Donzelli, Rome, 2016Google Scholar
Santomauro, G., ‘Referendum as an Instrument of “Policy Change” on a Crucial Bioethical Issue: A Comparative Case Study on Abortion in Italy and Ireland’, Nomos. Le attualità del diritto, No. 1, 2019, 1Google Scholar
Sartori, G., Parties and Party Systems: A Framework for Analysis, Cambridge University Press, New York, 1976Google Scholar
Scarciglia, R., Il divieto di mandato imperativo: contributo a uno studio di diritto comparato, CEDAM, Padua, 2005Google Scholar
Scheppele, K., ‘Orban’s Emergency’, 2020, https://verfassungsblog.de/orbans-emergency/Google Scholar
Schmidt, V., Democracy in Europe: The EU and National Polities, Oxford University Press, 2006Google Scholar
Schmitt, C., Democrazia e liberalismo. Referendum e iniziativa popolare Hugo Preuss e la dottrina tedesca dello Stato, Giuffrè, Milan, 2001Google Scholar
Schmitt, C., Volksentscheid und Volksbegehren. Ein Beitrag zur Auslegung der Weimarer Verfassung und zur Lehre von der unmittelbaren Demokratie, De Gruyter, Berlin, 1927Google Scholar
Scholte, J., ‘The Complacency of Legality: Constitutionalist Vulnerabilities to Populist Constituent Power’, German Law Journal, special issue 3, 2019, 351Google Scholar
Schütze, R., ‘Federalism as Constitutional Pluralism: “Letter from America”’, in Avbelj, M., Komárek, J. (eds.), Constitutional Pluralism in the European Union and Beyond, Hart, Oxford, 2012, 185Google Scholar
Scicluna, N., European Union Constitutionalism in Crisis, Routledge, Abingdon, 2015Google Scholar
Scicluna, N., Politicization without Democratization: The Impact of the Eurozone Crisis on EU Constitutionalism’, 2013, https://bit.ly/3xkjRyc.Google Scholar
Selvaggi, N., ‘Populism and Criminal Justice in Italy’, in Delledonne, G., Martinico, G., Monti, M., Pacini, F. (eds.), Italian Populism and Constitutional Law: Strategies, Conflicts and Dilemmas, Palgrave, London, 2020, 291Google Scholar
Shonfield, D., ‘Claudio Pavone’s classic history rescued the real history of the Italian resistance, and is still an essential counter to revisionist narratives, argues David Shonfield’, 2014, www.counterfire.org/articles/book-reviews/16985-a-civil-war-a-history-of-the-italian-resistanceGoogle Scholar
Somma, A., ‘Europa, sovranità e ordine economico nel prisma delle teorie federaliste’, DPCE online, No. 1, 2020, 427Google Scholar
Somma, A., ‘Un sovranismo democratico per un nuovo europeismo’, MicroMega, 2018, http://temi.repubblica.it/micromega-online/un-sovranismo-democratico-per-un-nuovo-europeismo/Google Scholar
Spadaro, A., ‘Costituzionalismo versus populismo: sulla c.d. deriva populistico-plebiscitaria delle democrazie’, in Brunelli, G., Pugiotto, A., Veronesi, P. (eds.), Scritti in onore di Lorenza Carlassare, Vol. V, Jovene, Naples, 2009, 2007Google Scholar
Stanley, B., ‘The Thin Ideology of Populism’, Journal of Political Ideologies, No. 1, 2008, 95Google Scholar
Stein, E., ‘International Law in Internal Law: Toward Internationalization of Central-Eastern European Constitutions?’, American Journal of International Law, No. 3, 1994, 427Google Scholar
Steinbach, A., ‘The Mutualization of Sovereign Debt: Comparing the American Past and the European Present’, Journal of Common Market Studies, No. 5, 2015, 1110Google Scholar
Steinbeis, M., ‘Majority is a Legal Concept’, 2017, http://verfassungsblog.de/majority-is-a-legal-concept/Google Scholar
Steuer, M., ‘Militant Democracy on the Rise: Consequences of Legal Restrictions on Extreme Speech in the Czech Republic, Slovakia and Hungary’, Review of Central and East European Law, 2019, 162Google Scholar
Streeck, W., Buying Time: The Delayed Crisis of Democratic Capitalism, Verso Books, London, 2014Google Scholar
Sturzo, L., ‘La guerra, l’Italia e l’intervistato’, in Sturzo, L, Politica di questi anni. 1957-1959, Zanichelli, Bologna, 1954, 144Google Scholar
Sunstein, C., The Filter Bubble: What the Internet Is Hiding from You, Penguin Press, London, 2011Google Scholar
Sunstein, C., ‘Incompletely Theorized Agreements. Commentary’, Harvard Law Review, No. 7, 1994, 1733Google Scholar
Sunstein, C., #republic: Divided Democracy in the Age of Social Media, Princeton University Press, 2017Google Scholar
Surkov, V. I., ‘Nationalization of the Future: Paragraphs pro Sovereign Democracy’, Russian Studies in Philosophy, No. 4, 2009, 8Google Scholar
Taggart, P., ‘Populism and the Pathology of Representative Politics’, in Mény, Y., Surel, Y. (eds.), Democracies and the Populist Challenge, Palgrave, London, 2002, 62Google Scholar
Taggart, P., ‘Populism and Representative Politics in Contemporary Europe’, Journal of Political Ideologies, No. 3, 2004, 269Google Scholar
Taggart, P., ‘Populism in Western Europe’, in Rovira Kaltwasser, C., Taggart, P., Ochoa Espejo, P., Ostiguy, P. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Populism, Oxford University Press, 2017, 248Google Scholar
Taguieff, P. A., L’illusion populiste, Berg International, Paris, 2002Google Scholar
Tarchi, M., Italia populista. Dal qualunquismo a Beppe Grillo, Il Mulino, Bologna, 2015Google Scholar
Tarchi, M., ‘Italy: The Promised Land of Populism?’, Contemporary Italian Politics, No. 3, 2015, 273Google Scholar
Tarchi, M., ‘Populism Italian Style’, in Mény, Y., Surel, Y. (eds.), Democracies and the Populist Challenge, Palgrave, London, 2002, 120Google Scholar
Tarli Barbieri, G., ‘La riduzione del numero dei parlamentari: una riforma opportuna? (ricordando Paolo Carrozza)’, Le Regioni, No. 2, 2019, 375Google Scholar
Taussig, M., Mimesis and Alterity, Routledge, Abingdon, 1993Google Scholar
Telò, M., Europe: A Civilian Power? European Union, Global Governance, World Order, Palgrave, London, 2006Google Scholar
Tierney, S., Constitutional Referendums: The Theory and Practice of Republican Deliberation, Oxford University Press, 2012Google Scholar
Todorov, T., Memory as a Remedy for Evil, Seagull Books, Kolkata, 2010Google Scholar
Tomba, M., ‘Who’s Afraid of the Imperative Mandate?’, Critical Times, No. 1, 2018, 108Google Scholar
Tonti, V., ‘Vincolo di mandato e democrazia diretta: verso un superamento del Parlamento?’, in Allegri, G., Sterpa, A., Viceconte, N. (eds.), Questioni costituzionali al tempo del populismo e del sovranismo, ES, Naples, 2019, 93Google Scholar
Topaloff, L., ‘The Rise of Referendums: Elite Strategy or Populist Weapon?’, Journal of Democracy, No. 3, 2017, 127Google Scholar
Torre, A., ‘Il referendum nel Regno Unito: radici sparse, pianta rigogliosa’, in Torre, A., Frosini, J. (eds.), Democrazia rappresentativa e referendum nel Regno Unito, Maggioli, Rimini, 2012, 11Google Scholar
Trerè, E., Barassi, V., ‘Net-authoritarianism? How Web Ideologies Reinforce Political Hierarchies in the Italian 5 Star Movement’, Journal of Italian Cinema & Media Studies, No. 3, 2015, 287Google Scholar
Tronconi, F., ‘The Italian Five Star Movement during the Crisis: Towards Normalisation?’, South European Society and Politics, No. 1, 2018, 163Google Scholar
Tushnet, M., ‘Abolishing Judicial Review’, Constitutional Commentary, No. 3, 2011, 581Google Scholar
Twomey, A., ‘Second Thoughts – Recall Elections for Members of Parliament’, Sydney Law School Research Paper No. 11/55, 2011, https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1922393Google Scholar
Tyulkina, S., Militant Democracy: Undemocratic Political Parties and Beyond, Routledge, Abingdon, 2015Google Scholar
Uleri, P. V., Referendum e democrazia. Una prospettiva comparata, Il Mulino, Bologna, 2003Google Scholar
Urbinati, N., Democracy Disfigured: Opinion, Truth, and the People, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 2014Google Scholar
Urbinati, N., ‘Democracy and Populism’, Constellations, No. 1, 1998, 110Google Scholar
Urbinati, N., ‘The Italian Five Star Movement for Foreigners’, 2018, www.rivistailmulino.it/a/the-italian-five-star-movement-for-foreignersGoogle Scholar
Urbinati, N., Me the People: How Populism Transforms Democracy, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 2019Google Scholar
Urbinati, N., ‘Populism and the Principle of Majority’, in Rovira Kaltwasser, C., Taggart, P., Ochoa Espejo, P., Ostiguy, P. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Populism, Oxford University Press, 2017, 571Google Scholar
Urbinati, N., Warren, M., ‘The Concept of Representation in Contemporary Democratic Theory’, Annual Review of Political Science, 2008, 387Google Scholar
Urbinati, N., Vandelli, L., La democrazia del sorteggio, Einaudi, Turin, 2020Google Scholar
Valditara, G., Sovranismo. Una speranza per la democrazia di Valditara, Book Time, Milan, 2017Google Scholar
Varriale, A., ‘The Myth of the Italian Resistance Movement (1943-1945). The Case of Naples’, Kirchliche Zeitgeschichte, No. 2, 2014, 383Google Scholar
Vassallo, S., ‘Government Under Berlusconi: The Functioning of the Core Institutions in Italy’, West European Politics, No. 4, 2007, 692Google Scholar
Vassallo, S., Passarelli, G., ‘Centre-left Prime Ministerial Primaries in Italy: The Laboratory of the “Open Party” Model’, Contemporary Italian Politics, No. 1, 2016, 12Google Scholar
Veca, S., La priorità del male, Feltrinelli, Milan, 2012Google Scholar
Veiga, F., González-Villa, C., Forti, S., Sasso, A., Prokopljevic, J., Moles, R., Patriotas indignados, Alianza, Madrid, 2019Google Scholar
Vermeule, A., The Constitution of Risk, Cambridge University Press, 2013Google Scholar
Vespa, B., Perché l’Italia diventò fascista, Mondadori, Milan, 2019Google Scholar
Vigevani, G. E., ‘Origine e attualità del dibattito sulla XII disposizione finale della Costituzione: i limiti della tutela della democrazia’, 2019, https://bit.ly/3AiOfuTGoogle Scholar
Volpe, G., ‘Referendum abrogativo e diritto di resistenza’, in Corte costituzionale (ed.), Il giudizio di ammissibilità del referendum abrogativo, Giuffrè, Milan, 1998, 284Google Scholar
Volpi, M., ‘Referendum (dir. cost)’, in Digesto delle discipline pubblicistiche, Vol. XII, UTET, Turin, 1997, 434Google Scholar
Volterra, S., ‘La Costituzione italiana e i modelli anglosassoni con particolare riguardo agli Stati Uniti’, in De Siervo, U. (ed.), Scelte della Costituente e cultura giuridica. I: Costituzione italiana e modelli stranieri, Il Mulino, Bologna, 1980, 117Google Scholar
Voßkuhle, A., ‘Demokratie und Populismus’, Der Staatt, No. 1, 2018, 119Google Scholar
Waldron, J., ‘The Core of the Case Against Judicial Review’, Yale Law Journal, No. 6, 2006, 1346Google Scholar
Wardle, C., Derakhshan, H., ‘Information Disorder: Toward an Interdisciplinary Framework for Research and Policy Making’, Council of Europe report DGI(2017)09, 2017, https://firstdraftnews.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Information_Disorder_FirstDraft-CoE_2018.pdf?x40896Google Scholar
Watson, A., Legal Transplants: An Approach to Comparative Law, Scottish Academic Press, Edinburgh, 1974Google Scholar
Weber, M., Economy and Society, University of California Press, Berkeley, 1978 (German edition 1922), https://archive.org/stream/MaxWeberEconomyAndSociety/MaxWeberEconomyAndSociety_djvu.txtGoogle Scholar
Weiler, J. H. H., ‘The Community System: The Dual Character of Supranationalism’, Yearbook of European Law, 1981, 267Google Scholar
Weill, R., ‘Dicey Was Not Diceyan’, Cambridge Law Journal, No. 2, 2003, 474Google Scholar
Wind, M., The Tribalization of Europe – A Defense of our Liberal Values, Espasa Calpe, Madrid, 2019Google Scholar
Zagrebelsky, G., ‘Una riflessione sulla democrazia’, in Gruppo di Resistenza Morale (ed.), Argomenti per il dissenso. Costituzione, democrazia, antifascismo, Celid, Turin, 1994, 24Google Scholar
Zagrebelsky, G., Il ‘Crucifige!’ e la democrazia. Il processo di Gesù Cristo come paradigma dei diversi modi di pensare la democrazia, Einaudi, Turin, 1995Google Scholar
Zakaria, F., ‘The Rise of Illiberal Democracy’, Foreign Affairs, No. 6, 1997, 22Google Scholar
Zanon, N., Il libero mandato parlamentare. Saggio critico sull’art. 67 della Costituzione, Giuffrè, Milan, 1991Google Scholar
Zolo, D., ‘Teoria e critica dello Stato di diritto’, in Costa, P., Zolo, D. (eds.), Lo Stato di diritto. Storia, teoria, critica, Feltrinelli, Milan, 2003, 17Google Scholar
Zucca, L., ‘Conflicts of Fundamental Rights as Constitutional Dilemmas’, STALS (Sant’Anna Legal Studies) Research Paper, 16/2008, www.stals.santannapisa.it/sites/default/files/stals_Zucca.pdfGoogle Scholar
‘Conte parla alla Camera: Fdi assente, Lega abbandona l’Aula’, 17 June 2020, https://bit.ly/3dt4VpKGoogle Scholar
‘Conte: “Rivendico natura populista del Governo”’, 8 December 2018, www.ilgiornale.it/video/politica/conte-rivendico-natura-populista-governo-1622063.htmlGoogle Scholar
‘La Costituzione è di ispirazione sovietica’, 12 April 2003, www.repubblica.it/online/politica/berluparla/torino/torino.htmlGoogle Scholar
‘Davide Casaleggio: “Il Parlamento? In futuro forse non sarà più necessario”’, 23 July 2018, https://bit.ly/2UjK7tWGoogle Scholar
‘Garante privacy: “Entro 5 giorni Rousseau consegni i dati al Movimento”’, 1 June 2021, https://www.garanteprivacy.it/web/guest/home/docweb/-/docweb-display/docweb/9591994Google Scholar
‘Governo: Di Battista contro Draghi, “l’apostolo delle élite”’, 2 February 2021, www.affaritaliani.it/notiziario/governo_di_battista_contro_draghi_lapostolo_delle_elite-182844.htmlGoogle Scholar
‘Grillo presenta le liste: “Apriremo il Parlamento come una scatola di tonno”’, 11 January 2013, https://bit.ly/3dB8g6cGoogle Scholar
‘La Lega ha davvero disertato i negoziati per riformare il Regolamento di Dublino?’, 20 September 2018, https://pagellapolitica.it/dichiarazioni/8104/la-lega-ha-davvero-disertato-i-negoziati-per-riformare-il-regolamento-di-dublinoGoogle Scholar
‘The many trials of Silvio Berlusconi explained’, 9 May 2014, www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-12403119Google Scholar
‘M5S a rischio scissione dopo il post di Casaleggio sul Blog: cosa sta succedendo’, 5 October 2020, www.fanpage.it/politica/m5s-a-rischio-scissione-dopo-il-post-di-casaleggio-sul-blog-cosa-sta-succedendo/Google Scholar
‘M5S non si accontenta: “Se vince il Sì poi tagliamo anche gli stipendi dei parlamentari”’, 13 September 2020, https://bit.ly/3iXaK2jGoogle Scholar
‘Riccardo Fraccaro: meno onorevoli e più referendum. In cinque leggi il piano di riforme’, 11 September 2018, https://bit.ly/3gDm56cGoogle Scholar
‘Salvini come Berlusconi: “Io ministro eletto dal popolo, i magistrati non lo sono”’, 7 September 2018, www.ilfattoquotidiano.it/2018/09/07/salvini-come-berlusconi-io-ministro-eletto-dal-popolo-i-magistrati-non-lo-sono/4611540/Google Scholar
‘Salvini in Senato: “Basta trionfalismi, siamo la maggioranza nel Paese, lasciateci parlare”’, 22 July 2020, www.agi.it/politica/news/2020-07-22/salvini-senato-mes-9230606/Google Scholar
‘Salvini per difendersi cita a sproposito la Costituzione: “La difesa della Patria è sacro dovere di ogni Cittadino”’, 4 February 2020, https://bit.ly/3gL1qMmGoogle Scholar
‘Taglio dei parlamentari, forbice gigante e striscione: i Cinquestelle festeggiano in piazza Montecitorio’, 8 October 2019, https://bit.ly/2St4oNeGoogle Scholar
Baldolini, V., ‘Referendum, 183 costituzionalisti dicono No’, 24 August 2020, https://bit.ly/35F3hNvGoogle Scholar
Barber, L., Foy, H., Baker, A., ‘Vladimir Putin: Liberalism Has “Outlived Its Purpose”’, 28 June 2019, www.ft.com/content/670039ec-98f3-11e9-9573-ee5cbb98ed36Google Scholar
Bershidsky, L., ‘Putin Ally’s “Deep State” Twist Is Deep Russian People’, 12 February 2019, www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2019-02-12/russia-has-its-own-deep-state-it-s-called-deep-peopleGoogle Scholar
Bertini, C., ‘Riccardo Fraccaro: meno onorevoli e più referendum. In cinque leggi il piano di riforme’, 11 September 2018, https://bit.ly/3dccnFHGoogle Scholar
Calhoun, G., ‘Europe’s Hamiltonian Moment – What Is It Really?’, 26 May 2020, www.forbes.com/sites/georgecalhoun/2020/05/26/europes-hamiltonian-moment–what-is-it-really/Google Scholar
Carli, A., ‘Rimborsi M5s, per probiviri irregolari oltre 45 parlamentari’, 7 January 2020, www.ilsole24ore.com/art/m5s-vertice-probiviri-morosi-dodici-parlamentari-non-presentano-rendiconti-gennaio-2019-ACS4jBABGoogle Scholar
Casaleggio, D., ‘Noi Siamo Movimento’, 4 October 2020, www.ilblogdellestelle.it/2020/10/noi-siamo-movimento.htmlGoogle Scholar
Casaleggio, D., ‘A Top Leader of Italy’s Five Star Movement: Why We Won’, 19 March 2018, www.washingtonpost.com/news/theworldpost/wp/2018/03/19/five-star/Google Scholar
Cassese, S., ‘Cassese: “La pandemia non è una guerra. I pieni poteri al governo non sono legittimi”’, 14 April 2020, www.ildubbio.news/2020/04/14/cassese-la-pandemia-non-e-una-guerra-pieni-poteri-al-governo-sono-illegittimi/Google Scholar
Ceccanti, S., ‘Referendum, perché Sì. Votare per il taglio dei parlamentari è una decisione da riformisti veri. Ve lo spiego in cinque punti’, 13 August 2020, www.ilfoglio.it/politica/2020/08/13/news/referendum-perche-si-330990/?underPaywall=trueGoogle Scholar
Cerulus, L., ‘5Stars Defend Their Digital Democracy in Face of Privacy Sanction’, 19 April 2019, www.politico.eu/article/davide-casaleggio-5stars-rousseau-platform-lashes-out-over-political-motivated-data-protection-fine/Google Scholar
Fairless, T., ‘After Firing Its Bazooka, ECB Could Reload to Fight Coronavirus’, 29 April 2020, www.wsj.com/articles/after-firing-its-bazooka-ecb-could-reload-to-fight-coronavirus-11588155329Google Scholar
Fenazzi, S., ‘Per M5S, quello svizzero è il “modello faro” di democrazia diretta’, 20 June 2016, https://bit.ly/2SMkqlzGoogle Scholar
Fraccaro, R., ‘Perché serve colmare il gap fra istituzioni e volontà popolare’, 9 agosto 2018, www.ilsole24ore.com/art/perche-serve-colmare-gap-istituzioni-e-volonta-popolare–AEhzbyXFGoogle Scholar
Fraccaro, R., ‘Referendum senza quorum: decide chi partecipa. Per riconquistare la sovranità servono cittadini attivi’, 29 May 2016, www.riccardofraccaro.it/referendum-senza-quorum-decide-chi-partecipa-per-riconquistare-la-sovranita-servono-cittadini-attivi/Google Scholar
Giubilei, F., ‘Oggi tutti parlano di “sovranismo” ma (quasi) nessuno spiega che cosa sia’, 11 December 2018, www.ilgiornale.it/news/spettacoli/oggi-tutti-parlano-sovranismo-quasi-nessuno-spiega-che-cosa-1614631.htmlGoogle Scholar
Grandesso, F., ‘Black Smoke for Bersani, Dangerous Games for Italy!’, 7 March 2013, www.neweurope.eu/article/black-smoke-bersani-dangerous-games-italy/Google Scholar
Grillo, G., ‘Il più grande inganno della Politica: farci credere che servano i politici’, 27 June 2018, www.beppegrillo.it/il-piu-grande-inganno-della-politica-e-farci-credere-che-servano-politici/Google Scholar
Hall, B., Arnold, M., Fleming, S., ‘Coronavirus: Can the ECB’s “Bazooka” Avert a Eurozone Crisis?’, 23 March 2020, www.ft.com/content/a7496c30-6ab7-11ea-800d-da70cff6e4d3Google Scholar
Johnson, M., Ghiglione, D., ‘Coronavirus in Italy: “When we heard about the lockdown we rushed to the station”’, 8 March 2020, www.ft.com/content/27458814-6159-11ea-a6cd-df28cc3c6a68Google Scholar
Kapoor, S., ‘This Isn’t Europe’s “Hamilton” Moment’, 22 May 2020, www.politico.eu/article/this-isnt-europes-hamilton-moment/Google Scholar
Kurz, S., ‘The “Frugal Four” Advocate a Responsible EU Budget’, 16 February 2020, www.ft.com/content/7faae690-4e65-11ea-95a0-43d18ec715f5Google Scholar
Le Nir, A., ‘Italie: Giuseppe Conte ouvre des “états généraux” pour relancer le pays’, 14 June 2020, www.rfi.fr/fr/europe/20200613-italie-giuseppe-conte-ouvre-etats-g%C3%A9n%C3%A9raux-relancer-le-paysGoogle Scholar
Maranini, G., ‘Totalitarismo dei partiti’, 28 July 1946, L’ArnoGoogle Scholar
Mari, L., ‘M5S, Casaleggio lascia il Movimento: “Nemmeno mio padre lo riconoscerebbe. Se si cerca legittimazione in tribunale la democrazia interna è fallita”’, 5 June 2021, www.repubblica.it/politica/2021/06/05/news/m5s_rousseau_dati-304277205/Google Scholar
Mola, G., ‘Berlusconi: “La mia biografia in tutte le famiglie italiane”’, 11 April 2001, www.repubblica.it/online/politica/campagnacinque/libro/libro.htmlGoogle Scholar
Provenzani, F., ‘“La trappola della Germania per far accettare il MES all’Italia” (Paolo Becchi)’, 7 May 2020, www.money.it/Piano-Germania-MES-Italia-Paolo-BecchiGoogle Scholar
Renzi, M., ‘Renzi: Nessun filo rosso tra me e Salvini’, 6 August 2019, www.repubblica.it/politica/2019/08/06/news/nessun_filo_rosso_tra_me_e_salvini-233001980/Google Scholar
Roberts, H., ‘Salvini Occupies Italian Parliament in Lockdown Protest’, 30 April 2020, www.politico.eu/article/matteo-salvini-coronavirus-occupies-italian-parliament-in-lockdown-protest/Google Scholar
Rodriquez, G., ‘Dai “marchi pe ’e bestie”, alle “processioni a casa de mi cugino” per poter contrarre malattie esantematiche. I vaccini secondo Paola Taverna (M5S)’, 7 August 2018, www.quotidianosanita.it/governo-e-parlamento/articolo.php?articolo_id=64805Google Scholar
Sassoon, D., ‘Claudio Pavone Obituary’, 22 December 2016, www.theguardian.com/books/2016/dec/22/claudio-pavone-obituaryGoogle Scholar
Sesto, M., ‘Taglio parlamentari, ecco come si restringe il Senato. La Lombardia è la regione che perde più seggi’, 28 agosto 2020, https://bit.ly/3gIJvpuGoogle Scholar
Siclari, M., ‘Taglio parlamentari, accolgo l’appello. I tre motivi perché voto no’, 10 August 2020, https://bit.ly/3qcalumGoogle Scholar
‘Conte parla alla Camera: Fdi assente, Lega abbandona l’Aula’, 17 June 2020, https://bit.ly/3dt4VpKGoogle Scholar
‘Conte: “Rivendico natura populista del Governo”’, 8 December 2018, www.ilgiornale.it/video/politica/conte-rivendico-natura-populista-governo-1622063.htmlGoogle Scholar
‘La Costituzione è di ispirazione sovietica’, 12 April 2003, www.repubblica.it/online/politica/berluparla/torino/torino.htmlGoogle Scholar
‘Davide Casaleggio: “Il Parlamento? In futuro forse non sarà più necessario”’, 23 July 2018, https://bit.ly/2UjK7tWGoogle Scholar
‘Garante privacy: “Entro 5 giorni Rousseau consegni i dati al Movimento”’, 1 June 2021, https://www.garanteprivacy.it/web/guest/home/docweb/-/docweb-display/docweb/9591994Google Scholar
‘Governo: Di Battista contro Draghi, “l’apostolo delle élite”’, 2 February 2021, www.affaritaliani.it/notiziario/governo_di_battista_contro_draghi_lapostolo_delle_elite-182844.htmlGoogle Scholar
‘Grillo presenta le liste: “Apriremo il Parlamento come una scatola di tonno”’, 11 January 2013, https://bit.ly/3dB8g6cGoogle Scholar
‘La Lega ha davvero disertato i negoziati per riformare il Regolamento di Dublino?’, 20 September 2018, https://pagellapolitica.it/dichiarazioni/8104/la-lega-ha-davvero-disertato-i-negoziati-per-riformare-il-regolamento-di-dublinoGoogle Scholar
‘The many trials of Silvio Berlusconi explained’, 9 May 2014, www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-12403119Google Scholar
‘M5S a rischio scissione dopo il post di Casaleggio sul Blog: cosa sta succedendo’, 5 October 2020, www.fanpage.it/politica/m5s-a-rischio-scissione-dopo-il-post-di-casaleggio-sul-blog-cosa-sta-succedendo/Google Scholar
‘M5S non si accontenta: “Se vince il Sì poi tagliamo anche gli stipendi dei parlamentari”’, 13 September 2020, https://bit.ly/3iXaK2jGoogle Scholar
‘Riccardo Fraccaro: meno onorevoli e più referendum. In cinque leggi il piano di riforme’, 11 September 2018, https://bit.ly/3gDm56cGoogle Scholar
‘Salvini come Berlusconi: “Io ministro eletto dal popolo, i magistrati non lo sono”’, 7 September 2018, www.ilfattoquotidiano.it/2018/09/07/salvini-come-berlusconi-io-ministro-eletto-dal-popolo-i-magistrati-non-lo-sono/4611540/Google Scholar
‘Salvini in Senato: “Basta trionfalismi, siamo la maggioranza nel Paese, lasciateci parlare”’, 22 July 2020, www.agi.it/politica/news/2020-07-22/salvini-senato-mes-9230606/Google Scholar
‘Salvini per difendersi cita a sproposito la Costituzione: “La difesa della Patria è sacro dovere di ogni Cittadino”’, 4 February 2020, https://bit.ly/3gL1qMmGoogle Scholar
‘Taglio dei parlamentari, forbice gigante e striscione: i Cinquestelle festeggiano in piazza Montecitorio’, 8 October 2019, https://bit.ly/2St4oNeGoogle Scholar
Baldolini, V., ‘Referendum, 183 costituzionalisti dicono No’, 24 August 2020, https://bit.ly/35F3hNvGoogle Scholar
Barber, L., Foy, H., Baker, A., ‘Vladimir Putin: Liberalism Has “Outlived Its Purpose”’, 28 June 2019, www.ft.com/content/670039ec-98f3-11e9-9573-ee5cbb98ed36Google Scholar
Bershidsky, L., ‘Putin Ally’s “Deep State” Twist Is Deep Russian People’, 12 February 2019, www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2019-02-12/russia-has-its-own-deep-state-it-s-called-deep-peopleGoogle Scholar
Bertini, C., ‘Riccardo Fraccaro: meno onorevoli e più referendum. In cinque leggi il piano di riforme’, 11 September 2018, https://bit.ly/3dccnFHGoogle Scholar
Calhoun, G., ‘Europe’s Hamiltonian Moment – What Is It Really?’, 26 May 2020, www.forbes.com/sites/georgecalhoun/2020/05/26/europes-hamiltonian-moment–what-is-it-really/Google Scholar
Carli, A., ‘Rimborsi M5s, per probiviri irregolari oltre 45 parlamentari’, 7 January 2020, www.ilsole24ore.com/art/m5s-vertice-probiviri-morosi-dodici-parlamentari-non-presentano-rendiconti-gennaio-2019-ACS4jBABGoogle Scholar
Casaleggio, D., ‘Noi Siamo Movimento’, 4 October 2020, www.ilblogdellestelle.it/2020/10/noi-siamo-movimento.htmlGoogle Scholar
Casaleggio, D., ‘A Top Leader of Italy’s Five Star Movement: Why We Won’, 19 March 2018, www.washingtonpost.com/news/theworldpost/wp/2018/03/19/five-star/Google Scholar
Cassese, S., ‘Cassese: “La pandemia non è una guerra. I pieni poteri al governo non sono legittimi”’, 14 April 2020, www.ildubbio.news/2020/04/14/cassese-la-pandemia-non-e-una-guerra-pieni-poteri-al-governo-sono-illegittimi/Google Scholar
Ceccanti, S., ‘Referendum, perché Sì. Votare per il taglio dei parlamentari è una decisione da riformisti veri. Ve lo spiego in cinque punti’, 13 August 2020, www.ilfoglio.it/politica/2020/08/13/news/referendum-perche-si-330990/?underPaywall=trueGoogle Scholar
Cerulus, L., ‘5Stars Defend Their Digital Democracy in Face of Privacy Sanction’, 19 April 2019, www.politico.eu/article/davide-casaleggio-5stars-rousseau-platform-lashes-out-over-political-motivated-data-protection-fine/Google Scholar
Fairless, T., ‘After Firing Its Bazooka, ECB Could Reload to Fight Coronavirus’, 29 April 2020, www.wsj.com/articles/after-firing-its-bazooka-ecb-could-reload-to-fight-coronavirus-11588155329Google Scholar
Fenazzi, S., ‘Per M5S, quello svizzero è il “modello faro” di democrazia diretta’, 20 June 2016, https://bit.ly/2SMkqlzGoogle Scholar
Fraccaro, R., ‘Perché serve colmare il gap fra istituzioni e volontà popolare’, 9 agosto 2018, www.ilsole24ore.com/art/perche-serve-colmare-gap-istituzioni-e-volonta-popolare–AEhzbyXFGoogle Scholar
Fraccaro, R., ‘Referendum senza quorum: decide chi partecipa. Per riconquistare la sovranità servono cittadini attivi’, 29 May 2016, www.riccardofraccaro.it/referendum-senza-quorum-decide-chi-partecipa-per-riconquistare-la-sovranita-servono-cittadini-attivi/Google Scholar
Giubilei, F., ‘Oggi tutti parlano di “sovranismo” ma (quasi) nessuno spiega che cosa sia’, 11 December 2018, www.ilgiornale.it/news/spettacoli/oggi-tutti-parlano-sovranismo-quasi-nessuno-spiega-che-cosa-1614631.htmlGoogle Scholar
Grandesso, F., ‘Black Smoke for Bersani, Dangerous Games for Italy!’, 7 March 2013, www.neweurope.eu/article/black-smoke-bersani-dangerous-games-italy/Google Scholar
Grillo, G., ‘Il più grande inganno della Politica: farci credere che servano i politici’, 27 June 2018, www.beppegrillo.it/il-piu-grande-inganno-della-politica-e-farci-credere-che-servano-politici/Google Scholar
Hall, B., Arnold, M., Fleming, S., ‘Coronavirus: Can the ECB’s “Bazooka” Avert a Eurozone Crisis?’, 23 March 2020, www.ft.com/content/a7496c30-6ab7-11ea-800d-da70cff6e4d3Google Scholar
Johnson, M., Ghiglione, D., ‘Coronavirus in Italy: “When we heard about the lockdown we rushed to the station”’, 8 March 2020, www.ft.com/content/27458814-6159-11ea-a6cd-df28cc3c6a68Google Scholar
Kapoor, S., ‘This Isn’t Europe’s “Hamilton” Moment’, 22 May 2020, www.politico.eu/article/this-isnt-europes-hamilton-moment/Google Scholar
Kurz, S., ‘The “Frugal Four” Advocate a Responsible EU Budget’, 16 February 2020, www.ft.com/content/7faae690-4e65-11ea-95a0-43d18ec715f5Google Scholar
Le Nir, A., ‘Italie: Giuseppe Conte ouvre des “états généraux” pour relancer le pays’, 14 June 2020, www.rfi.fr/fr/europe/20200613-italie-giuseppe-conte-ouvre-etats-g%C3%A9n%C3%A9raux-relancer-le-paysGoogle Scholar
Maranini, G., ‘Totalitarismo dei partiti’, 28 July 1946, L’ArnoGoogle Scholar
Mari, L., ‘M5S, Casaleggio lascia il Movimento: “Nemmeno mio padre lo riconoscerebbe. Se si cerca legittimazione in tribunale la democrazia interna è fallita”’, 5 June 2021, www.repubblica.it/politica/2021/06/05/news/m5s_rousseau_dati-304277205/Google Scholar
Mola, G., ‘Berlusconi: “La mia biografia in tutte le famiglie italiane”’, 11 April 2001, www.repubblica.it/online/politica/campagnacinque/libro/libro.htmlGoogle Scholar
Provenzani, F., ‘“La trappola della Germania per far accettare il MES all’Italia” (Paolo Becchi)’, 7 May 2020, www.money.it/Piano-Germania-MES-Italia-Paolo-BecchiGoogle Scholar
Renzi, M., ‘Renzi: Nessun filo rosso tra me e Salvini’, 6 August 2019, www.repubblica.it/politica/2019/08/06/news/nessun_filo_rosso_tra_me_e_salvini-233001980/Google Scholar
Roberts, H., ‘Salvini Occupies Italian Parliament in Lockdown Protest’, 30 April 2020, www.politico.eu/article/matteo-salvini-coronavirus-occupies-italian-parliament-in-lockdown-protest/Google Scholar
Rodriquez, G., ‘Dai “marchi pe ’e bestie”, alle “processioni a casa de mi cugino” per poter contrarre malattie esantematiche. I vaccini secondo Paola Taverna (M5S)’, 7 August 2018, www.quotidianosanita.it/governo-e-parlamento/articolo.php?articolo_id=64805Google Scholar
Sassoon, D., ‘Claudio Pavone Obituary’, 22 December 2016, www.theguardian.com/books/2016/dec/22/claudio-pavone-obituaryGoogle Scholar
Sesto, M., ‘Taglio parlamentari, ecco come si restringe il Senato. La Lombardia è la regione che perde più seggi’, 28 agosto 2020, https://bit.ly/3gIJvpuGoogle Scholar
Siclari, M., ‘Taglio parlamentari, accolgo l’appello. I tre motivi perché voto no’, 10 August 2020, https://bit.ly/3qcalumGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Giuseppe Martinico
  • Book: Filtering Populist Claims to Fight Populism
  • Online publication: 18 November 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108866156.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Giuseppe Martinico
  • Book: Filtering Populist Claims to Fight Populism
  • Online publication: 18 November 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108866156.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Giuseppe Martinico
  • Book: Filtering Populist Claims to Fight Populism
  • Online publication: 18 November 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108866156.009
Available formats
×