Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-lvtdw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-23T02:30:00.363Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - European and comparative company law

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 August 2010

Mads Andenas
Affiliation:
Universitetet i Oslo
Frank Wooldridge
Affiliation:
British Institute of International and Comparative Law
Get access

Summary

Harmonisation and free movement

Treaty provisions

It is now recognised generally that although there is no question of the total approximation or harmonisation of the company laws of the Member States, a considerable body of European company law has been brought into existence. This has come about mainly through the enactment of directives under Articles 44(2)(g) and 95 EC (former Articles 54(3)(g), 100a EC). The first mentioned Article is set out in Chapter 2, ‘Right of establishment of Title II EC, “free movement of persons, services and capital”’. It provides:

The Council and the Commission shall carry out the duties devolving on them under the preceding provisions, in particular (g) by coordinating to the necessary extent the safeguards which for the protection of the interests of members and others, are required by Member States of companies within the meaning of Article 48(2) with a view to making such safeguards equivalent throughout the community.

Article 44(2)(g) EC is the basis for nearly all enacted directives in European company law. Despite its position in Chapter 2 of the Treaty, the Community institutions pursue a broad interpretation which is orientated towards the aims of the Treaty. In that view also measures with the purpose of approximating the prevailing conditions of company law can be based on it as long as they have beneficial effect on cross-border transactions.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Werlauff, E., EU Company Law. Common Business Law for 28 States, 2nd edn (Copenhagen: DJØF Publishing, 2003)Google Scholar
Grundmann, S., Europäisches Gesellschaftsrecht (Heidelberg: C. F. Müller, 2003)Google Scholar
Edwards, V., EC Company Law (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1999)Google Scholar
Habersack, M., Europäisches Gesellschaftsrecht (Munich: Beck, 1999)Google Scholar
Stein, E., Harmonization of European Company Laws (1971) 174–182.
Heinze, S., Europäisches Kapitalmarktrecht (Munich: Beck, 1999), p. 12Google Scholar
Thoma, G. F. and Leuering, D., ‘Die Europäische Aktiengesellschaft – Societas Europaea’ [2000] Neue Juristische Wochenschrift1449Google Scholar
Stein, E., Harmonization of European Company Laws (1971), p. 525.
Werlauff, E., EC Company Law (Copenhagen: Jurist– og Økonomforbundets, 1993), pp. 15–17.Google Scholar
Goldman, B.La fusion des sociétés et le projet de convention sur la fusion internationale des sociétés anonymes’ [1981] 17 CDE4.Google Scholar
Farmer, P.Removing legal obstacles to cross-border mergers: EEC proposal for a tenth directive’ [1987] Business Law Review 35 f., 53Google Scholar
Usher, J., The Law of Money and Financial Services in the European Community (Oxford: EC Law Library, 2000), pp. 91–6.Google Scholar
Rammeloo, St, Corporations in Private International Law – a European perspective (Oxford University Press: 2001), pp. 72–85Google Scholar
Schwarz, G. C., Europäisches Gesellschaftsrecht (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2000)Google Scholar
Schwarz, G. C., Europäisches Gesellschaftsrecht (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2000)Google Scholar
Hopt, K., Kanda, H., Roe, M., Wymeersch, E. and Prigge, St (eds), Comparative Corporate Governance (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998), pp. 1045
Hopt, K.Europäisches Gesellschaftsrecht – Krise und neue Anläufe’ [1988] Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht (ZIP) 96, 103Google Scholar
Lutter, M., ‘Die Entwicklung der GmbH in Europa und in der Welt’, in Lutter, M. (ed), Festschrift 100 Jahre GmbH-Gesetz (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 1992), pp. 49–55Google Scholar
Morse, G., ‘The Second Directive – raising and maintenance of capital’ [1977] European Law Review126Google Scholar
Wooldridge, F., Company Law in the United Kingdom and the European Community (London: Athlone Press, 1991), pp. 25 ff.Google Scholar
Wymeersch, E., ‘Company Law in the Twenty-First Century’ [2000] 1 International and Comparative Corporate Law Journal 331, 332–5Google Scholar
Pettet, B., ‘Private versus Public Regulation in the fields of Takeovers: The Future under the Directive’ [2000] 11 European Business Law Review381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Du Plessis, Dine, ‘The Fate of the Draft Fifth Directive on Company Law – Accomodation Instead of Harmonisation’ [1997] Journal of Business Law 23Google Scholar
Grundmann, S., Europäisches Gesellschaftsrecht (Heidelberg: C. F. Müller, 2003)Google Scholar
Marco, G. di, ‘Der Vorschlag der Kommission für eine 14. Richtlinie – Stand und Perspektiven’ [1999] Zeitschrift für Gesellschaftsrecht3Google Scholar
Wouters, J. and Schneider, H. (eds), Current Issues of Cross-Border Establishment of Companies in the European Union (Antwerp: Apeldoorn, 1995)
Hansen, J. P.A new look at Centros – from a Danish point of view’ [2002] 13 European Business Law Review85, 86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drury, , ‘Migrating Companies’ [1999] ELR 354, 362.Google Scholar
Wooldridge, F., Company Law in the United Kingdom and the European Community (London: Athlone Press, 1991), p. 8Google Scholar
Menjucq, M., Droit européen des sociétés (Paris: Montchrestien, 2001) pp. 301 f., 309 f.:Google Scholar
Bruhn, H., Niederlassungsfreundliche Sitzverlegung und Verschmelzung über die Grenze nach italienischem Recht – eine rechtsvergleichende Untersuchung unter Berücksichtigung der europäischen Niederlassungsfreiheit (Bonn: Diss, 2002) pp. 142–97 and 197–234.Google Scholar
Deininger, R. A., Grenzüberschreitende Verlegung des Hauptverwaltungssitzes und der Geschäftsleitung von Kapitalgesellschaften – eine Betrachtung unter europarechtlichen, gesellschaftsrechtlichen und steuerrechtlichen Gesichtspunkten (Herdecke: GCA, 2001)Google Scholar
Hommelhoff, , ‘Zum revidierten Vorschlag für eine EG-Konzernrichtlinie’, in Goedeler, Reinhard (ed), Festschrift Fleck (Berlin: de Gruyter, 1988), p. 125.Google Scholar
Basedow, J. (ed), Aufbruch nach Europa, Festschrift 75 Jahre Max-Planck-Institut für Privatrecht (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2001), p. 215
Lübking, J., Ein einheitliches Konzernrecht für Europa (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2000)Google Scholar
Sugarman, D. and Teubner, G. (eds), Regulating Corporate Groups in Europe (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 1990)
Wymeersch, E., ‘Harmoniser le droit des groupes de sociétés en Europe? ’, in Due, O. (ed), Festschrift Everling (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 1995), p. 1699.Google Scholar
Werlauff, E., EC Company Law (Copenhagen: Jurist– og Økonomforbundets Forlag, 1993), 408 ff.Google Scholar
Werlauff, E., EU Company Law, 2nd edn (Copenhagen: Jurist– og Økonomforbundets Forlag, 2003).Google Scholar
Tiebout, , ‘A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures’ [1956] 64 Journal of Political Economy416 ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esty, D. C. and Geradin, D., ‘Regulatory Co-operation’ [2000] Journal of International Economic Law 235, 238 fGoogle Scholar
Gatsios, K. and Holmes, P., ‘Regulatory Competition’, in Newman, P. (ed.), The New Palgrave of Economics and the Law, vol. 1 (London, 1998), p. 271.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J. A., The Theory of Economic Development – An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest and the Business Cycle (Cambridge, 1934)Google Scholar
Hayek, F. A., ‘Competition as a Discovery Procedure’ in: Hayek, F. A. (ed), New Studies in Philosophy, Politics, Economics and the History of Ideas (Chicago: University Press, 1985), pp. 179 ffGoogle Scholar
Kerber, W., ‘Rechtseinheitlichkeit und Rechtsvielfalt aus ökonomischer Sicht,’ in Grundmann, S. (ed), Systembildung und Systemlücken in Kerngebieten des Europäischen Privatrechts, Gesellschaftsrecht, Arbeitsrecht, Schuldvertragsrecht (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2000), pp. 67, 68Google Scholar
Bebchuk, L. A., ‘Federalism and the Corporation: The Desirable Limits on State Competition in Corporate Law’ [1992] 105 Harvard Law Review1435, 1444–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alva, , ‘Delaware and the Market for Corporate Charters – History and Agency’ [1990] 15 Delaware Journal of Corporate Law885 ff.Google Scholar
Buxbaum, R. M. and Hopt, K., Legal Harmonization and the Business Enterprise – Corporate and Capital Market Law Harmonization Policy in Europe and the U.S.A. (de Gruyter Berlin/New York 1988) pp. 25 ff.Google Scholar
Romano, , The Genius of American Corporate Law (Washington, 1993), pp. 14 ff.Google Scholar
Butler, , ‘Nineteenth Century Jurisdictional Competition in the Granting of Corporate Privileges’ [1985] 14 Journal of Legal Studies129 ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conard, , ‘An Overview of the Laws of Corporations’ [1973] 71 Michigan Law Review623 ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deakin, S., ‘Legal Diversity and Regulatory Competition: Which Model for Europe?’ (2006) 12 European Law Journal440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitthoff, C. M., ‘The Future of the European Company Law Scene’, inSchmitthoff, C. M. (ed), The Harmonization of European Company Law (UK: National Committee of Comparative Law, 1973) 3, 9Google Scholar
Rammeloo, S., Corporations in Private International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001), pp. 116–20.Google Scholar
Menjucq, M., Droit international et européen des sociétés (Paris: Montchrestien, 2001). pp. 90–95.Google Scholar
Bratton, W., McCahery, J., Piccioto, S. and Scott, C. (eds), International Regulatory Competition and Coordination – Perspectives on Economic Regulation in Europe and the United States (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996), pp. 127, 141.
Romano, R., The Genius of American Corporate Law (Washington, 1993), p. 133Google Scholar
Grundmann, S., ‘Wettbewerb der Regelgeber im Europäischen Gesellschaftsrecht – jedes Marktsegment hat seine Struktur’ [2001] Zeitschrift für Gesellschaftsrecht783Google Scholar
Wymeersch, E., ‘Company Law in the Twenty-First Century’ [2000] 1 International and Comparative Corporate Law Journal331, 339.Google Scholar
Grundmann, S., ‘Das Thema Systembildung und Systemlücken’, in Grundmann, S. (ed), Systembildung und Systemlücken in Kerngebieten des Europäischen Privatrechts, Gesellschaftsrecht, Arbeitsrecht, Schuldvertragsrecht (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2000), pp. 1, 16.Google Scholar
Lomnicka, E., ‘The Home Country Control Principle in the Financial Service Directives and the Case Law’, in Andenas, M. and Roth, W-H., Services and Free Movement in EU Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002), pp. 295, 315.Google Scholar
Gonzalez, J. P., ‘The Principle of Subsidiarity (a Guide for Lawyers with a Particular Community Orientation’ [1995] European Law Review 355Google Scholar
Toth, A. K., ‘The Principle of Subsidiarity in the Maastricht Treaty’ [1992] 29 CMLR1079.Google Scholar
Hopt, K. J., ‘Company Law in the European Union: Harmonization and/or Subsidiarity’ [1999] 1 International and Comparative Corporate Law Journal41, 48.Google Scholar
Wymeersch, E., ‘Company Law in the Twenty-First Century’ [2000] 1 International and Comparative Corporate Law Journals331, 332–5Google Scholar
Grundmann, S., Europäisches Gesellschaftsrecht (Heidelberg: C. F. Müller, 2003), para. 248.Google Scholar
Schmitthoff, C. M. (ed), The Harmonization of European Company Law (UK: National Committee of Comparative Law, 1973), pp. 66, 75.
Habersack, M., Europäisches Gesellschaftsrecht (Munich: Beck, 1999), para. 283 ff.Google Scholar
Boucourechliev, J. and Hommelhoff, P. (eds), Vorschläge für eine Europäische Privatgesellschaft – Strukturelemente einer kapitalmarktfernen europäischen Gesellschaftsform nebst Entwurf für eine EPG-Verordnung der Europäischen Gemeinschaft (Cologne: O. Schmidt, 1999)
Hommelhoff, P. and Helms, D. (eds), Neue Wege in die Europäische Privatgesellschaft – Rechts– und Steuerfragen in der Heidelberger Diskussion (Cologne: O. Schmidt, 2001)
Kluiver, H-J. and Gerven, W. (eds), The European Private Company? (Antwerp: Maklu, 1995).
Schwarz, G. C., Europäisches Gesellschaftsrecht (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2000)Google Scholar
Grundmann, S., ‘The Structure of European Company Law: From Crisis to Boom’ (2004) 5 European Business Organisation Law Review601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drury, and Xuereb, (eds), European Company Laws: A Comparative Approach (Aldershot: Dartmouth, 1991), p. 87.
Ochs, V., Die Einpersonengesellschaft in Europa – eine rechtsvergleichende Studie zum Recht der Einpersonen-GmbH in Deutschland, Frankreich, Italien und England (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 1997), p. 29.Google Scholar
Ault, H. J.Harmonization of Company Law in the European Economic Community’ [1968] 20 Hastings Law Journal 77, 103 fGoogle Scholar
Stein, E., Harmonization of European Company Laws (Bobb's Merrill, 1971), pp. 292–4Google Scholar
Wyatt, D., ‘The First Directive and Company Law’ [1978] 94 LQR182.Google Scholar
Habersack, M., Europäisches Gesellschaftsrecht (Munich: Beck, 1999), para. 105Google Scholar
Schmitthoff, , ‘The Second Directive on Company Law’ [1976] 15 CMLRev 43, 53–4.Google Scholar
Schmitthoff, , ‘The Second Directive on Company Law’ [1976] 15 CMLRev 43, 54.Google Scholar
Gansen, G., Harmonisierung der Kapitalaufbringung im englischen und deutschen Kapitalgesellschaftsrecht – Vergleichende Studie zur Zweiten Gesellschaftsrechtlichen EG-Richtlinie (Frankfurt: P. Lang, 1992).Google Scholar
Schmitthoff, C. (ed.), The Harmonization of European Company Law (London: UK National Committee of Comparative Law, 1973), p. 66
Striebeck, C., Reform des Aktienrechts durch die Strukturrichtlinie der Europäischen Gemeinschaften (Frankfurt am Main: Lang, 1992), p. 33 f.Google Scholar
Davies, P., ‘Board Structure in the UK and Germany: Convergence or Continuing Divergence?’ [2001] 2 International and Comparative Corporate Law Journal435.Google Scholar
Roth, M., Unternehmerisches Ermessen und Haftung des Vorstands (Munich: Beck, 2001).Google Scholar
Wiethölter, , Interessen und Organisation der Aktiengesellschaft im deutschen und amerikanischan Recht (Karlsruhe: C. F. Müller, 1961).Google Scholar
Stein, E., Harmonization of European Company Laws (1971) (Bobbs Merrill, 1971), p. 100, n. 32Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×