Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Search

Refine search

Refine search

Access:
Content type:
Publication date:
Apply   From and To filters
Subject: Show more
Journals Show more
Publishers: Show more
Societies Show more
Series: Show more
Collections: Show more

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

1 results

  • 17 - Phase Field Theory

  • from Part III - Types of Phase Transformations
  • Brent Fultz, California Institute of Technology
  • Book:
    Phase Transitions in Materials
    Published online:
    24 April 2020
    Print publication:
    14 May 2020, pp 441-457

  • Summary

    Phase field theory treats the phases in materials as fields inside a material, as opposed to tracking the motions of interfaces during phase transformations. The interface sharpness is determined by a balance between bulk free energies and the square gradients of the fields. Treating phases as fields has advantages for the computational materials science of microstructural evolution, and some kinetic mechanisms are described. The different equations for the evolution of a conserved order parameter (e.g., composition) and a nonconserved order parameter (e.g., spin orientation) are discussed. The structure of an interface, especially its width, is analyzed for the typical case of an antiphase domain boundary. The Ginzburg–Landau equation is presented, and the effects of curvature on interface stability are discussed. Some aspects of the dynamics of domain growth are described.