Search

5 - Fisher II
Cedric Merlin Powell, University of Louisville, Kentucky
Book:

Post-Racial Constitutionalism and the Roberts Court

Published online:

27 October 2022

Print publication:

03 November 2022, pp 128-142
- Chapter
- - Get access
    
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
    
    Log in Register
- Export citation
Summary

The Roberts Courts post-racial conception of affirmative action means that diversity is simply an aspirational myth, not substantive equality for the historically excluded.

5 - Most-Favoured-Nation Treatment
August Reinisch, Christoph Schreuer
Book:

International Protection of Investments

Published online:

13 July 2020

Print publication:

16 July 2020, pp 680-812
- Chapter
- - Get access
    
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
    
    Log in Register
- Export citation
Summary

Each Contracting Party shall accord to investors of the other Contracting Party and to their investments treatment no less favourable than that it accords, in like circumstances, to investors and investments of any third State.

4 - National Treatment
August Reinisch, Christoph Schreuer
Book:

International Protection of Investments

Published online:

13 July 2020

Print publication:

16 July 2020, pp 587-679
- Chapter
- - Get access
    
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
    
    Log in Register
- Export citation
Summary

Each Contracting Party shall accord to investors of the other Contracting Party and to their investments treatment no less favourable than that it accords, in like circumstances, to its own investors and investments.

The Law of Persecution Before the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia
Ken Roberts
Journal:

Leiden Journal of International Law / Volume 15 / Issue 3 / September 2002

Published online by Cambridge University Press:

08 March 2005, pp. 623-639

Print publication:

September 2002
- Article
- - Get access
    
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
    
    Log in Register
- Export citation
The various Trial Chambers of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia have advanced potentially inconsistent definitions of the crime of persecution under Article 5 of the Tribunal's Statute. The Trial Chamber in the Krnojelac case, in attempting to reconcile these different approaches, has undertaken a comprehensive analysis both of the actus reus and mens rea elements constituting this offence. In the context of the Tribunal's jurisprudence, this article analyses these elements and briefly discusses other issues related to the crime of persecution.

Search Results