Auditory system plasticity is a promising target for neuromodulation, cognitive rehabilitation and therapeutic development in schizophrenia (SZ). Auditory-based targeted cognitive training (TCT) is a ‘bottom up’ intervention designed to enhance the speed and accuracy of auditory information processing, which has been shown to improve neurocognition in certain SZ patients. However, the dynamics of TCT learning as a function of training exercises and their impact on neurocognitive functioning and therapeutic outcomes are unknown.

Forty subjects (SZ, n = 21; healthy subjects (HS), n = 19) underwent comprehensive clinical, cognitive, and auditory assessments, including measurements of auditory processing speed (APS) at baseline and after 1-h of TCT. SZ patients additionally completed 30-hours of TCT and repeated assessments ~10–12 weeks later.

SZ patients were deficient in APS at baseline (d = 0.96, p < 0.005) relative to HS. After 1-h of TCT, analyses revealed significant main effects of diagnosis (d = 1.75, p = 0.002) and time (d = 1.04, p < 0.001), and a diagnosis × time interaction (d = 0.85, p = 0.02) on APS. APS learning effects were robust after 1-h in SZ patients (d = 1.47, p < 0.001) and persisted throughout the 30-h of training. Baseline APS was associated with verbal learning gains after 30-h of TCT (r = 0.51, p = 0.02) in SZ.

TCT learning metrics may have prognostic utility and aid in the prospective identification of individuals likely to benefit from TCT. Future experimental medicine studies may advance predictive algorithms that enhance TCT-related clinical, cognitive and functional outcomes.

The COVID-19 pandemic has affected the continuity of cognitive rehabilitation (CR) worldwide. However, the use of teleneuropsychology (TNP) to provide CR has contributed significantly to the continuity of treatment. The objective of this study was to measure the effects of CR via the TNP on cognition, neuropsychiatric symptoms, and memory strategies in a cohort of patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI).

A sample of 60 patients (60% female; age: 72.4±6.96) with MCI according to Petersen criteria was randomly divided into two groups: 30 cases (treatment group) and 30 controls (waiting list group). Subjects were matched for age, sex, and MMSE or MoCA.

The treatment group received ten weekly CR sessions of 45 minutes weekly. Pre-treatment (week 0) and post-treatment (week 10) measures were assessed for both groups. Different Linear Mixed Models were estimated to test treatment effect (CR vs. Controls) on each outcome of interest over Time (Pre/Post), controlling for Diagnosis, Age, Sex, and MMSE/MoCA performance.

A significant Group (Control/Treatment) x Time (pre/post) interaction revealed that the treatment group at 10 weeks had better scores in cognitive variables: memory (RAVLT learning trials p=0.030; RAVLT delayed recall p=0.029), phonological fluency(p=0.001), activities of daily living (FAQ p=0.001), satisfaction with memory performance (MMQ Satisfaction p=0.004) and use of memory strategies (MMQ Strategy p=0.00), and a significant reduction of affective symptomatology: depression (GDS p=0.00), neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPIQ p=0.045), Forgetfulness (EDO-10 p=0.00), Stress (DAS Stress p=0.00).

This is the first study to test CR using teleNP in South America. Our results suggest that CR through teleNP is an effective intervention to improve performance on cognitive variables and reduce neuropsychiatric symptomatology compared to patients with MCI. These results have great significance in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic in South America, where teleNP is proving to be a valuable tool.

Cognitive problems, both complaints and objective impairments, are frequent and disabling in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) and profoundly affect daily living. However, intervention studies that focus on cognitive problems that patients experience in their daily lives are limited. This study therefore aimed to investigate the effectiveness of cognitive rehabilitation therapy (CRT) and mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) on patient-reported cognitive complaints in MS.

In this randomized-controlled trial, MS patients with cognitive complaints completed questionnaires and underwent neuropsychological assessments at baseline, post-treatment and 6-month follow-up. Patient-reported cognitive complaints were primarily investigated. Secondary outcomes included personalized cognitive goals and objective cognitive function. CRT and MBCT were compared to enhanced treatment as usual (ETAU) using linear mixed models.

Patients were randomized into CRT (n=37), MBCT (n=36) or ETAU (n=37), of whom 100 completed the study. Both CRT and MBCT positively affected patient-reported cognitive complaints compared to ETAU at post-treatment (p<.05), but not 6 months later. At 6-month follow-up, CRT had a positive effect on personalized cognitive goals (p=.028) and MBCT on processing speed (p=.027). Patients with less cognitive complaints at baseline benefited more from CRT on the Cognitive Failures Questionnaire (i.e. primary outcome measuring cognitive complaints) at post-treatment (p=.012-.040), and those with better processing speed at baseline benefited more from MBCT (p=.016).

Both CRT and MBCT alleviated cognitive complaints in MS patients immediately after treatment completion, but these benefits did not persist. In the long term, CRT showed benefits on personalized cognitive goals and MBCT on processing speed. These results thereby provide insight in the specific contributions of available cognitive treatments for MS patients.

Community reintegration and participation have been shown to be significantly correlated to improved Quality of Life (QoL) following moderate to severe traumatic brain injury (msTBI), yet these models often come with significant levels of unaccounted variability (Pierce and Hanks, 2006). Measures for community participation frequently employ objective measures of participation, such as number of outings in a week or current employment status (Migliorini et al., 2016), which may not adequately account for lifestyle differences, especially in aging populations. Less often integrated are subjective measures of an individual’s own belongingness and autonomy within the community (Heineman et al., 2011), also referred to as their participation enfranchisement (PE). The present study examines three questions pertinent to the potential clinical value of PE. First, do measures of objective participation significantly predict an individual’s PE ratings? Second, are both types of measures equally successful predictors of QoL for aging individuals with chronic-stage msTBI. Finally, would controlling for either objective or subjective integration ratings enable neurocognitive assessments to better predict QoL post injury?

41 older-adults (M= 65.32; SD= 7.51) with a history of msTBI were included (M= 12.59 years post-injury;SD= 8.29) for analysis. Subjective community integration was measured through the Participation Enfranchisement Survey. The Participation Assessment with Recombined Tools-Objective (PART-O) provided the objective measurement of participation. Quality of life was assessed through the Quality of Life after Brain Injury (QOLIBRI). An estimate of neurocognitive performance was created through the Brief Test of Adult Cognition by Telephone (BTACT), which includes six domains including: verbal-learning and memory (immediate and delayed recall), working memory (digit-span backwards), reasoning (number sequencing), semantic fluency (category fluency), and processing speed (backwards counting). Performance on the BTACT, PE ratings, and PART-O scores were included as the dependent variables in stepwise, linear regression models predicting QoL ratings to assess the differential contribution of the dependent variables and potential interaction effects.

While both the PART-O (f(1,39)=5.52;p=.024,n2=.124) and the PE survey (f(1,39)=14.31 ;p<.001,n2=.268) significantly predicted QoL, the addition of PE in the PART-O model resulted in significant (20.9%) reduction in unaccounted variance. Further in the model controlling for PE, PART-O no longer provides a significant (p=.15) contribution to the model estimating QoL (f(2,38)=8.41; p=.001). Performance on the BTACT correlated with PART-O (p<.0001), but not PE (p=.13) ratings. Finally, across two models controlling for BTACT performance, PE (p=.002,partial n2=.23), but not PART-O (p=.28,partial n2=.031) contributed significantly to QoL predictions. No significant interactions between PART-O, PE, and/or BTACT were observed when added to any model.

MsTBI impacts nearly every facet of an individual’s life, and as such, improving QoL post-injury requires a broad, yet well-considered approach. The objective ratings of participation, subjective PE, BTACT performance, all independently predicted quality of life in this sample. However, after controlling for neurocognitive assessment performance, PE was shown to independently contribute to quality of life, while the PART-O ratings no longer provided significant contribution. While community integration is a vital factor to consider for long-term rehabilitation, tailoring what “integration” means to the patient may hold significant potential to improve long-term quality of life.

Research on healthcare disparities has found that racial and ethnic minority population were less likely to receive intensive and effective rehabilitation following an acquired brain injury compared to their White counterparts. Immigrant status and language barriers further perpetuate the disparities in access to rehabilitation care. In addition to institutional barriers such as absence of culturally and linguistically appropriate health materials as well as lack of cultural competency training for staff, patient factors such as dissonance in cultural value orientation to health care has been identified as a common culturally-mediated barrier accounting for lower healthcare utilization rate among immigrants. Cultural factors including health beliefs and values impact patient’s self-appraisal of illness and have been studied as significant predictors for treatment adherence. The present case study seeks to demonstrate the role of socio-cultural factors in shaping the course of a Chinese immigrant patient’s neuropsychological evaluation and cognitive rehabilitation following an aneurysm rupture and subarachnoid hemorrhage.

The patient is a 64-year-old, monolingual Mandarin-speaking female who was born and raised in mainland China, referred for neuropsychological evaluation for treatment planning following an anterior communicating artery aneurysm rupture and subarachnoid hemorrhage. Cognitive complaints included selective retrograde amnesia and difficulty with short-term episodic memory. Patient completed neuropsychological assessment, then underwent a course of time-limited cognitive remediation.

Neuropsychological assessment was administered in Mandarin Chinese, and the majority of the tests utilized available norms from Mandarin-speaking Chinese population. While the patient continued to demonstrate at or above average functioning in aspects of executive function, she exhibited a pattern of “rapid forgetting” on modality-nonspecific learning and memory in addition to reductions in attention, working memory, psychomotor speed and visuo-perceptual integration. In the absence of mood symptoms, the patient demonstrated emotional resilience and strong family support system. Given reportedly minimal benefits from prior SLP intervention, barriers to treatment were examined and considered: linguistic factor, difficulty in holding on to information due to anterograde amnesia, and the lack of family involvement in the treatment process. In the context of Chinese family system and immigration history, family-centered care is imperative for the patient’s rehabilitation process. Main treatment goals included improving awareness of cognitive deficits as well as reinforcing consistent use of external strategies to compensate for impaired orientation and memory. Flexibility in the use of evidenced-based interventions were emphasized. The patient’s family were counselled in a culturally competent manner to further understand the aspects that matter the most for the patient and incorporate multi-sensory learning to facilitate intervention.

In this case study, we utilized culturally and linguistically appropriate norms and critically examined barriers to treatment from a contextual lens. This case highlights the role of culturally competent neuropsychological evaluation and incorporating a strength-based and multi-method approach in informing treatment planning for cognitive rehabilitation with immigrant population. Given the dearth in the existing cross-cultural literature, there is a clear need to conduct high-quality research in under-studied and under-represented immigrant populations to reduce the gap in service delivery and enhance treatment effectiveness.

Lateralization and localization of neuropathology helps determine the extent to which eloquent cortex and diseased brain tissue share loci, important information for neurosurgical decision-making, and predicting neurocognitive outcomes. Emerging data suggest that lateralization and localization can inform specific neurorehabilitation approaches following acquired brain injury (ABI). In recent years, computerized cognitive remediation (CCR) of attention and working memory (WM) has been included among treatment guidelines to enhance cognition in post-acute recovery following ABI. Although CCR has shown promise for improving attention and executive functioning in ABI, it is unknown how treatment response may be predicted by locus of ABI. Even less is known about the effects of CCR following neurosurgery. The current study explores neurosurgical lateralization and localization as potential variables for predicting treatment response to CCR.

Adult patients with a variety of neurological diagnoses (N = 17; ∼47% women) completed a full course of Cogmed Working Memory Training (CWMT) s/p neurosurgical intervention. All participants engaged in 30 sessions of CWMT over eight weeks, as well as neuropsychological (NP) assessment at pre-training baseline, immediate post-training, and at 3-month follow-up. Objective and subjective indices of attention, working memory, executive functioning, and emotional well-being were evaluated at three time-points. Neurosurgical loci included left-hemisphere frontal, temporal, and temporoparietal lobes, as well as right-hemisphere frontal, frontotemporal, and temporal lobes.

NP data were reviewed and yielded a clinical impression of cognitive and affective functioning for a cohort of patients with heterogeneous diagnoses (e.g., brain tumor, epilepsy, NPH). Preliminary NP findings suggested that treatment response to CCR for WM was consistent with extant literature on brain-behavior relationships according to lateralization and localization of neurosurgical intervention.

Neurosurgical patients experience neurocognitive and affective dysfunction that may respond well to cognitive rehabilitation (CR) that includes CCR. Additionally, it is possible that lateralization and localization of surgical intervention may contribute to individual differences in treatment response. Further neurorehabilitation research is warranted to identify patients most likely to benefit from CCR and better tailor CR modalities to optimize recovery s/p neurological surgery.

This was a pilot study testing a cognitive enhancement program to improve rate of cognitive recovery in early substance abuse treatment. It is hypothesized that if patients were able to accelerate the rate of cognitive improvement, they may be able to better engage in substance abuse treatment and potentially have better long-term outcomes.

Participants were 47 adults newly admitted to a residential substance abuse treatment facility (74.5% male, 76.6% white, mean age=34.5 years, education=12+ years). All were post-detox. All were being treated for opioid abuse, with the majority in treatment for polysubstance abuse. Participants were randomly assigned to either the intervention group (BrainHQ research cognitive training program) or active control group (inert computer games) and completed 34 training sessions per week for a minimum of 3 weeks. NIH Toolbox cognition battery was administered at baseline and endpoint.

Regardless of study group, most participants had a significant improvement in cognitive performance across most subtests and composite scores of the NIH Toolbox cognition battery. The RAVLT and Oral Symbol Digit subtests had the greatest change (p<.001) for both groups, as well as a significant improvement (p=.002) in Cognitive Function Composite Score for both groups. The only difference between the control and intervention group was on the Pattern Comparison subtest, with the intervention group scoring significantly higher at endpoint (p=.004).

Although substance abuse is known to cause injury to the brain that may not be fully repaired by sobriety, cognitive recovery was significant in this group of patients during early inpatient treatment for opioid abuse. Although it has yielded significant effect in other patient populations, the BrainHQ program did not show a significant enhancement in cognitive recovery, compared to the active control group, in this pilot study of patients in treatment for opioid abuse. This study was limited by a small sample size and potential future variations should be considered, such as changes to intervention intensity and specific intervention exercises.

Persistent brain fog is common in adults with Post-Acute Sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection (PASC), in whom it causes distress and in many cases interferes with performance of instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) and return-to-work. There are no interventions with rigorous evidence of efficacy for this new, often disabling condition. The purpose of this pilot is to evaluate the efficacy, on a preliminary basis, of a new intervention for this condition termed Constraint-Induced Cognitive therapy (CICT). CICT combines features of two established therapeutic approaches: cognitive speed of processing training (SOPT) developed by the laboratory of K. Ball and the Transfer Package and task-oriented training components of Constraint-Induced Movement therapy developed by the laboratory of E. Taub and G. Uswatte.

Participants were > 3 months after recovery from acute COVID symptoms and had substantial brain fog and impairment in IADL. Participants were randomized to CICT immediately or after a 3-month delay. CICT involved 36 hours of outpatient therapy distributed over 4-6 weeks. Sessions had three components: (a) videogamelike training designed to improve how quickly participants process sensory input (SOPT), (b) training on IADLs following shaping principles, and (c) a set of behavioral techniques designed to transfer gains from the treatment setting to daily life, i.e., the Transfer Package. The Transfer Package included (a) negotiating a behavioral contract with participants and one or more family members about the responsibilities of the participants, family members, and treatment team; (b) assigning homework during and after the treatment period; (c) monitoring participants’ out-of-session behavior; (d) supporting problem-solving by participants and family members about barriers to performance of IADL; and (e) making follow-up phone calls. IADL performance, brain fog severity, and cognitive impairment were assessed using validated, trans-diagnostic measures before and after treatment and three months afterwards in the immediate-CICT group and on parallel occasions in the delayed-CICT group (aka waitlist controls).

To date, five were enrolled in the immediate-CICT group; four were enrolled in the wait-list group. All had mild cognitive impairment, except for one with moderate impairment in the immediate-CICT group. Immediate-CICT participants, on average, had large reductions in brain fog severity on the Mental Clutter Scale (MCS, range = 0 to 10 points, mean change = -3.7, SD = 2.0); wait-list participants had small increases (mean change = 1.0, SD = 1.4). Notably, all five in the immediate-CICT group had clinically meaningful improvements (i.e., changes > 2 points) in performance of IADL outside the treatment setting as measured by the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) Performance scale; only one did in the wait-list group. The advantage for the immediate-CICT group was very large on both the MCS and COPM (d’s = 1.7, p’s < .05). In follow-up, immediate-CICT group gains were retained or built-upon.

These preliminary findings warrant confirmation by a large-scale randomized controlled trial. To date, CICT shows high promise as an efficacious therapy for brain fog due to PASC. CICT participants had large, meaningful improvements in IADL performance outside the treatment setting, in addition to large reductions in brain fog severity.

Some active-duty military service members and veterans experience combinations of persistent traumatic stress, depression, suicidal ideation, anger, aggressive behavior, substance misuse, sleep disturbance, complicated grief, moral injury, headaches and migraines, chronic bodily pain, and cognitive weakness or deficits. The purpose of this study is to describe the clinical outcomes of active-duty service members and veterans who have completed the traumatic brain injury (TBI) and brain health track of a two-week intensive clinical treatment and rehabilitation program.

The sample included 141 participants, with a history of TBI, in the Intensive Clinical Program (ICP). The ICP is a multidisciplinary, two-week treatment and rehabilitation program for active duty service members and veterans with complex psychological, cognitive, and physical health concerns. The program is comprised of daily individual therapy, group psychotherapy, psychoeducation, skills-building groups, and complementary and alternative medicine treatments. Participants in the ICP completed the following measures prior to initiating treatment and immediately following completion of treatment: Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory (NSI), Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5), Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), Self-Efficacy for Symptom Management Scale (SE-SMS), and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-Satisfaction with Participation in Social Roles and Activities-Short Form 8a, version 1.0 (PROMIS-S). Wilcoxon signed ranks tests were used to examine differences in scores on self-report measures from pretreatment to posttreatment for the full sample and within three subgroups stratified by age (in years: 20-34; 35-45; and 46-66). For the NSI, changes in the proportion of participants endorsing moderate or worse levels of individual symptoms from pretreatment to posttreatment were assessed using McNemar’s tests. Alpha levels were set at p<0.05 for all analyses.

Participants reported statistically significant improvements across all of the administered measures (NSI, PCL-5, PHQ-9, PROMIS-S, and SE-SMS) upon conclusion of treatment. Effect sizes ranged from medium to large (d=0.34-1.04) for the full sample. Effect sizes were largely consistent across age subgroups (20-34: d=0.32-1.05; 35-45: d=0.55-0.96; 46-66: d=0.28-1.05). The magnitude of change on the SE-SMS appeared to be less with increasing age (20-34: d=1.05; 35-45: d=0.69; 46-66: d=0.28). Individual item analyses for the NSI revealed statistically significant reductions in the proportion of participants endorsing moderate or greater severity from pretreatment to posttreatment for 18 of 22 symptoms.

Active duty service members and veterans participating in the two-week TBI and brain health intensive clinical program reported considerable symptom reduction at the conclusion of the program. Further research is indicated to assess the durability of symptom reduction.

The objective of the present study is to expand our understanding of visual complaints in people with multiple sclerosis (MS) with the aim of exploring potential rehabilitation approaches for treating visual complaints. Visual complaints are increasingly recognized as a core manifestation of MS. Up to 90% of people with MS report all kinds of visual complaints, such as blurry vision, double vision, being blinded by bright light, a reduced visual field and having trouble with depth perception. Since intact vision is quintessential to many activities of daily life, such as reading or car driving, these complaints affect independent participation to a great extent. The complaints cannot be fully explained by optical neuritis (a common symptom of MS) or other treatable visual or ophthalmological disorders. Moreover, there are no rehabilitation programs available for visual complaints in people with MS. However, the complaints are not yet understood well enough to develop effective rehabilitation strategies to reduce the impact of the visual complaints.

Visual complaints were assessed using the Screening Visual Complaints questionnaire. 68 people with MS with visual complaints, and 37 with hardly any visual complaints received a standard visual function assessment and a neuropsychological assessment. Correlations between the visual complaints, visual functions and cognitive functions were calculated. In addition, correlations were calculated between several visual functions and a composite score of the neuropsychological assessment.

Only some specific visual measures related to visual complaints, with small to moderate effect sizes. While most specific cognitive functions did not show correlations, measures indicative of overall cognitive capacity in people with MS (such as motor speed) consistently correlated with different kinds of visual complaints. Additionally, visual functions that related to visual complaints also correlated with the composite score for cognitive functioning.

Our study serendipitously showed that in developing or composing effective rehabilitation strategies for visual complaints, we should look beyond a person’s visual functioning: first, the overall cognitive capacity should be taken into account. Second, visual functioning and cognitive functioning are closely related. These results indicate that visual complaints may be a result of a general decline of the visual and/or cognitive system as one. When treating these complaints, low vision rehabilitation and neuropsychological rehabilitation strategies may be combined. Strategies should not focus on specific visual or cognitive functions, but at making the visual world more easily accessible, or more easily visible, to reduce the impact on the visual system and cognitive capacity. Strategies could range from applying more contrast in the environment to psycho-education. Future research should focus on developing rehabilitation programs and assessing their effectiveness in people with MS or with other types of non-acquired brain injuries.

Cognitive training has shown promise for improving cognition in older adults. Aging involves a variety of neuroanatomical changes that may affect response to cognitive training. White matter hyperintensities (WMH) are one common age-related brain change, as evidenced by T2-weighted and Fluid Attenuated Inversion Recovery (FLAIR) MRI. WMH are associated with older age, suggestive of cerebral small vessel disease, and reflect decreased white matter integrity. Higher WMH load associates with reduced threshold for clinical expression of cognitive impairment and dementia. The effects of WMH on response to cognitive training interventions are relatively unknown. The current study assessed (a) proximal cognitive training performance following a 3-month randomized control trial and (b) the contribution of baseline whole-brain WMH load, defined as total lesion volume (TLV), on pre-post proximal training change.

Sixty-two healthy older adults ages 65-84 completed either adaptive cognitive training (CT; n=31) or educational training control (ET; n=31) interventions. Participants assigned to CT completed 20 hours of attention/processing speed training and 20 hours of working memory training delivered through commercially-available Posit Science BrainHQ. ET participants completed 40 hours of educational videos. All participants also underwent sham or active transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) as an adjunctive intervention, although not a variable of interest in the current study. Multimodal MRI scans were acquired during the baseline visit. T1- and T2-weighted FLAIR images were processed using the Lesion Segmentation Tool (LST) for SPM12. The Lesion Prediction Algorithm of LST automatically segmented brain tissue and calculated lesion maps. A lesion threshold of 0.30 was applied to calculate TLV. A log transformation was applied to TLV to normalize the distribution of WMH. Repeated-measures analysis of covariance (RM-ANCOVA) assessed pre/post change in proximal composite (Total Training Composite) and sub-composite (Processing Speed Training Composite, Working Memory Training Composite) measures in the CT group compared to their ET counterparts, controlling for age, sex, years of education and tDCS group. Linear regression assessed the effect of TLV on post-intervention proximal composite and sub-composite, controlling for baseline performance, intervention assignment, age, sex, years of education, multisite scanner differences, estimated total intracranial volume, and binarized cardiovascular disease risk.

RM-ANCOVA revealed two-way group*time interactions such that those assigned cognitive training demonstrated greater improvement on proximal composite (Total Training Composite) and sub-composite (Processing Speed Training Composite, Working Memory Training Composite) measures compared to their ET counterparts. Multiple linear regression showed higher baseline TLV associated with lower pre-post change on Processing Speed Training sub-composite (ß = -0.19, p = 0.04) but not other composite measures.

These findings demonstrate the utility of cognitive training for improving postintervention proximal performance in older adults. Additionally, pre-post proximal processing speed training change appear to be particularly sensitive to white matter hyperintensity load versus working memory training change. These data suggest that TLV may serve as an important factor for consideration when planning processing speed-based cognitive training interventions for remediation of cognitive decline in older adults.

I-InTERACT-North is a stepped-care telepsychological parenting intervention designed to promote positive parenting skills and improve child behaviour. Initially developed for children with traumatic brain injury, our pilot study has shown efficacy in increasing positive parenting skills and reducing problem behaviours for children with early brain injury (e.g., stroke, encephalopathy). Recently, the program has expanded to include children with neurodevelopmental disorders, including Autism Spectrum Disorder. Although positive parenting programs (e.g., Parent-Child Interaction Therapy) can be effective for autistic children, it is unknown whether the goals most important to these families can be addressed with IInTERACT-North program. An examination of suitability and preliminary efficacy was conducted.

Parent participants of autistic children between 3 and 9 years (n= 20) were recruited from the neonatal, neurology, psychiatry, or cardiology clinics at The Hospital for Sick Children and the Province of Ontario Neurodevelopmental Disorders (POND) Network. Top problems, as reported by parents at baseline, were analyzed qualitatively through a cross-case analysis procedure in order to identify common themes and facilitate generalizations surrounding concerning behaviours. Parent-reported intensity of their children’s top problem behaviours on a scale from 1 (“not a problem”) to 8 (“huge problem”) were quantified. To explore preliminary program efficacy, t-tests were used to compare pre- and post-intervention problems and intensity on the Eyberg Child Behavior Inventory (ECBI) (n=16).

A total of 56 top problem data units were examined, with convergent thematic coding on 53 of 56 (94.6% inter-coder reliability). Four prevalent, high-agreement themes were retained: emotion dysregulation (19; 33.9%), non-compliance (12; 21.4%), sibling conflict (7; 12.5%), and inattention and hyperactivity (7; 12.5%). Average problem intensity for these themes ranged from 5.85 to 6.53 (where 8 is greatest impairment) with emotion dysregulation having the highest intensity (6.53) compared to the others. Scores on the ECBI were lower post-intervention (Intensity scale: M= 59.06, SD= 8.1; Problem scale: M= 60.69, SD= 11.5) compared to pre-intervention (Intensity scale: M= 61.19, SD= 10.4; Problem scale: M= 64.31, SD= 11.7), but small sample size precluded detecting statistical significance (p’s = .16 and .07, respectively).

Thematic analysis of top problems identified by parents of autistic children suggested that concerns were transdiagnostic in nature, and represent common treatment targets of the I-InTERACTNorth program. Though challenging behaviours related to restricted interests or repetitive behaviours may exist in our sample, parental behavioural goals appeared to align with the types of concerns traditionally raised by participants of the program, supporting a transdiagnostic approach. Preliminary data point to positive treatment outcomes in these families.

Compensatory strategy training has been identified as a useful mechanism to improve everyday cognitive function among older adults with Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI). Despite this, few studies have looked at cognitive factors that support adherence and engagement in these programs, which are key to maximizing benefit. The present study aimed to evaluate the relationship between cognition, adherence, and engagement during a group-based compensatory strategy training for people with MCI. We hypothesized individuals with better memory and executive function performance would show better adherence and higher engagement scores in cognitive training classes.

Twenty-five participants enrolled in Emory University's Charles and Harriet Schaffer Cognitive Empowerment Program (CEP) completed an 11-week compensatory strategy training group (CEP-CT). CEP-CT is adapted from Ecologically Oriented Neurorehabilitation to be suitable for people with MCI. Participants enrolled were on average 74.3 years old (SD= 5.4), 52% Male, primarily Caucasian (80%; 16% African American), and college educated (M= 16.5 years; SD= 2.7). All participants received clinical diagnoses of MCI prior to enrollment in the program. Participants completed multiple cognitive measures, including Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Hopkins Verbal Learning Test (HVLT), Trail Making Test A & B (TMT), Number Span Forward (NSF) and verbal fluency (S-words and Animals). For all group sessions, class attendance (present vs. not present) was recorded for each participant and their care partner, and engagement ratings for participants were recorded by the facilitator on a 1 to 5 scale (higher scores indicate better engagement). Outcomes include adherence to cognitive training (percentage of sessions attended; M= 82% class attendance, SD= 18%) as well as the average engagement ratings across 11 weeks (M= 3.25, SD= .40).

Bivariate Pearson correlations revealed that individuals who attended more classes also demonstrated better engagement in class, r= .44, p= .03. Class attendance was significantly related to performance on measures of memory and executive function (HVLT: r= -.42, p= .04; TMT-B: r= .69, p= .04), such that participants who performed worse on these measures attended more CEP-CT classes. Average engagement ratings were unrelated to cognitive performance.

Results did not support initial hypotheses, and instead indicate individuals with poorer performance on measures of memory and executive function had better adherence to CEP-CT classes, as measured by attendance. These results may indicate individuals experiencing cognitive difficulties are more likely to attend cognitive training classes. Subjective engagement ratings were unrelated to cognition; however, individuals who attended more sessions were more engaged in cognitive training classes. Future areas of research include objective measurement of class engagement as well as the incorporation of nuanced adherence metrics to further elucidate the relationship between these factors and cognition in MCI.

CI Cognitive Therapy (CICT) is a combination of behavioral techniques derived from CI Movement Therapy (CIMT) modified to apply to the cognitive domain, and Speed of (Cognitive) Processing Training (SOPT). SOPT is effective in improving cognitive function in the treatment setting and driving ability in everyday situations. The data concerning the effect of SOPT on other cognition-based instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) in everyday situations is incomplete. The strengths of CIMT, based on its Transfer Package (TP), are to facilitate 1) transfer of improved function from the treatment setting to IADL in everyday settings, and 2) long-term retention of the improved performance of IADL. This study sought to determine in a preliminary case series whether the TP of CI Movement Therapy combined with SOPT would have the same effect on a wide range of impaired cognition-based ADL.

Participants were 6 adults with chronic stroke: mean chronicity = 36.2 months, (range, 16-56 months); mean age = 59.7 years, (range, 47-55); 1 female; 3 African American and 3 European American. Five had mild cognitive impairment, while one had moderate impairment. Participants received 35 hours of outpatient treatment in 10-15 sessions distributed over 2-6 weeks, depending on the participants’ availability. Sessions began with 1 hour of SOPT training followed by training of cognition-based ADL by the process of shaping, a common method in the behavior analysis field. Other behavior analysis methods employed in the TP of CI Movement Therapy were used, including: 1) behavior contracting, daily assignment of homework, participation of a family member in the training and monitoring process, daily administration of a structured interview assessing amount and quality of performance of 30 IADL, problem solving to overcome perceived (or real) barriers to performance of IADL. Participants were given daily homework assignments in follow-up and were contacted in periodic, pre-arranged phone calls to determine status, compliance and problem-solve.

All six participants showed marked improvement on the SOPT test similar to that in the Ball et al studies. However, here transfer to IADL outside the treatment setting was substantial. On the main real-world outcome, the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM), there were increases of 2.7±1.3 and 2.1±1.6 on the two scales (d’s = 1.9 & 1.3, respectively). (Changes on the COPM > 2 points are considered clinically meaningful and changes in d’ >.8 are considered large). On two other real-word measures, the Cognitive Task Activity Log (CTAL) and inventory of Improved and New Cognitive Activities (INCA), there was a marked increase during the acquisition phase of training. There was no loss in retention over the 6-16 months (mean = 12.2) of follow-up to date. Instead, the INCA showed strong further improvement after the end of treatment-setting training, especially in the New Activities Not Performed Since Before Stroke Onset category, going from a mean of 8.2 after training to 14.6 at the end of follow-up.

These very preliminary results suggest that CICT may be an efficacious therapy for mild to moderate cognitive impairment in chronic stroke and possibly other disorders.

Physical, sensory, and cognitive function are all related to successful aging, quality of life, and independence in older age. Decline in cognitive function, in particular, can create difficulty in many Instrumental Activities of Daily Living such as driving and other aspects of everyday function. Loss of driving competence can subsequently lead to depression, isolation, loss of independence and reduced quality of life. Results from a large randomized controlled trial investigating the long-term impact of Speed of Processing Training will be presented demonstrating the impact of such training on cognitive and everyday function. Speed of Processing Training is an adaptive cognitive intervention administered on a computer that improves visual attention, and has been shown to enhance the connections needed for visual attention using task-driven and resting state fMRI.

The ACTIVE clinical trial recruited a volunteer sample of 2,832 community dwelling older adults between the ages of 65 and 94 years at six different field sites in six different states. This study evaluated the impact of three cognitive interventions targeted at improving cognitive and everyday function which served as contract control conditions for each other. Participants were randomly assigned to speed of processing training, reasoning training, memory training, or a no-contact control group. Follow-up testing was collected in person for ten years, and at twenty years final archival data was collected from the Departments of Motor Vehicles at each of the six field sites, as well as the Medicare/Medicaid data across the twenty years since enrollment. Outcomes included measures of cognitive function, measures of IADL (including crash involvement and driving cessation), and secondary outcomes of mobility (falls, driving habits, life space), quality of life, mortality and health conditions (from Medicare Records).

Results will be presented with respect to everyday function including several longitudinal measures of mobility: number of miles driven per year and driving difficulty, rates of driving cessation, and crash involvement. Random effects modelling, cox proportional hazards, and rate ratios will be presented illustrating the positive impact of cognitive training on these outcome measures. In particular, Speed of Processing Training was found to sustain driving competence with respect to continued driving relative to other types of training, and to reduce the risk of crash involvement over ten years. Furthermore, decline in Speed of Processing was the only cognitive measure predictive of crash involvement longitudinally in the no-contact control group. Positive benefits were also observed for Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL), and depression.

The ACTIVE clinical trial, among other studies, has demonstrated that cognitive training can have long-term positive benefit on the everyday abilities, quality of life, and continued independence of older adults.

Older adults experiencing mild cognitive difficulties (MCD) may benefit from compensatory cognitive training (CCT) to address cognitive changes. CCT can be delivered over various lengths of time and can focus on a specific cognitive domain (e.g., memory) or multiple domains. Identifying the most relevant and impactful portions of a CCT intervention could allow for more effective and streamlined delivery of compensatory strategies, perhaps allowing this type of training to be included in feedback sessions or brief interventions. This study sought to investigate which factors older adults with MCD found to be most beneficial and applicable to their daily lives after completion of a brief telehealth CCT program.

Adults age 55+ with documented MCD (n=28) and an optional care partner (CP; n=18) were recruited for video-chat delivery of a 6-week, motivationally-enhanced CCT program adapted from CogSMART. The six weeks included content addressing: Education and Lifestyle Strategies (Session 1); Organization, Prioritization, and Prospective Memory (Session 2); Attention, Concentration, and Working Memory (Session 3); Learning and Memory (Session 4); Executive Functions: Decision-Making, Problem-Solving, and Planning (Session 5); and Skills Integration and Next Steps (Session 6). After completing the course, participants (n=25) provided open-ended feedback on course content, including the areas they found most helpful. They were also asked which strategies from the course they had successfully applied in their daily lives, and which they expected to continue using following the course. Qualitative data were coded and analyzed by two researchers.

Participants most often endorsed strategies from Session 2 (44% of participants) and Session 3 (44%) as being helpful and applicable in daily life. Session 1 content was also frequently endorsed (36%). Content from Session 5 was noted to have been helpful/applicable least often (12%). Participants also reported having found common factors of the program to be helpful (35%), such as interaction with the clinician, education on relevant resources, or greater self-reflection and self-awareness through the program. A minority of participants reported “all” (22%) or “none” (24%) of the content to be helpful.

Among older adults with MCD, strategies related to prospective memory (e.g., calendar training) and attention (e.g., mindfulness) were most frequently reported as being helpful and applicable in daily life. Participants reported confidence in their ability to continue using these strategies after the program, along with continued implementation of lifestyle factors to promote healthy brain aging (e.g., exercise). Clinicians interested in providing CCT to older adults with MCD may find the most benefit from emphasizing and prioritizing strategies within these domains. Future research could use ecological momentary assessment techniques to gather real-time measures of how these learned strategies are employed in daily life. Continued exploration of the most salient and effective compensatory strategies for older adults with MCD will support effective intervention and promote independence among aging patients.

Medulloblastoma is the most common pediatric malignant brain tumor. Approximately 29% of medulloblastoma patients experience postoperative posterior fossa syndrome (PFS) characterized by impairments in speech, motor, and mood. An interdisciplinary rehabilitation approach is associated with greater rehabilitation gains than a single discipline approach for brain injury patients with significant rehabilitation needs. However, literature regarding the feasibility and utility of this approach within a tertiary care pediatric hematology/oncology setting is lacking. The Acute Neurological Injury (ANI) service was developed to coordinate care for neurologically complex hematology/oncology patients receiving active cancer treatment, including those with PFS. ANI care coordination includes bimonthly interdisciplinary team meetings, interdisciplinary goal implementation for each patient, parent psychoeducation about applicable brain-behavior relationships (including PFS) at treatment initiation, neuropsychological assessment at transition times throughout treatment, cognitive remediation, and coordinated end of treatment transition planning. We gathered caregiver perspective on this approach within a tertiary care pediatric hematology/oncology setting.

Parents of children and young adults (ages 4-20) with PFS after medulloblastoma resection who received coordinated care as part of the ANI program (n=20) were interviewed at least 4 months following completion of cancer treatment. 75% experienced postoperative mutism while the remainder experienced significantly decreased speech without mutism. All received cranial-spinal irradiation and focal boosts to tumor sites followed by chemotherapy per multi-institutional treatment protocol. Caregivers were interviewed regarding perceived feasibility and utility of ANI program components including parent psychoeducation, neuropsychological assessment, cognitive remediation, and interdisciplinary team coordination/goal setting, as well as parental supports. Yes/no responses were gathered as well as responses regarding the perceived utility of aspects of the interdisciplinary ANI program approach via a five-point Likert scale.

Surveys were completed by 66% of families contacted. Mean age at first contact with neuropsychology as part of the ANI program was 9.45 years (SD=4.4 years). Mean time between end of treatment and parent interview was 3.20 years (SD=2.01 years). Most parents reported that initial psychoeducation about PFS helped to decrease their concerns (81%) and increased their understanding of their child’s functioning in the context of PFS (88%). They reported benefit from neuropsychological assessment reports prior to initiating adjuvant treatment (92%), at end of treatment (90%), and one year following initiation of cancer treatment (100%), though they perceived less benefit from assessments intended to inform provider interventions during treatment (81% and 66%). Reports were shared most often with schools (75%), behavioral therapists (50%), physicians (50%), and rehabilitation specialists (25%). Parents indicated that the interdisciplinary ANI program approach was helpful (94%) and the coordinated interdisciplinary goal was beneficial (92%). Most parents favored the weekly frequency of cognitive remediation sessions (83%). Much interest was voiced in establishing a formal mentoring program to offer peer support by parents whose children have previously experienced PFS to those acutely managing a new PFS diagnosis (95%). Of note, all participants indicated that they would be willing to serve in a peer mentor role (100%).

The interdisciplinary ANI program approach is feasible with perceived benefits to families managing new PFS and medulloblastoma diagnoses and receiving active cancer treatment.

Children with neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs) commonly experience attentional and executive function (EF) difficulties that are negatively associated with academic success, psychosocial functioning, and quality of life. Access to early and consistent interventions is a critical protective factor and there are recommendations to deliver cognitive interventions in schools; however, current cognitive interventions are expensive and/or inaccessible, particularly for those with limited resources and/or in remote communities. The current study evaluated the school-based implementation of two game-based interventions in children with NDDs: 1) a novel neurocognitive attention/EF intervention (Dino Island; DI), and 2) a commercial educational intervention (Adventure Academy; AA). DI is a game-based attention/EF intervention specifically developed for children for delivery in community-based settings.

Thirty five children with NDDs (ages 5-13 years) and 17 EAs participated. EAs completed on-line training to deliver the interventions to assigned students at their respective schools (3x/week, 40-60 minutes/session, 8 weeks, 14 hours in total). We gathered baseline child and EA demographic data, completed pre-intervention EA interviews, and conducted regular fidelity checks throughout the interventions. Implementation data included paper-pencil tracking forms, computerized game analytic data, and online communications.

Using a mixed methods approach we evaluated the following implementation outcomes: fidelity, feasibility, acceptability, and barriers. Overall, no meaningful between-group differences were found in EA or child demographics, except for total number of years worked as an EA (M = 17.18 for AA and 9.15 for DI; t (22) = - 4.34, p < .01) and EA gender (χ2 (1) = 6.11, p < .05). For both groups, EA age was significantly associated with the number of sessions played [DI (r = .847, p < .01), AA (r = .986, p < .05)]. EAs who knew their student better completed longer sessions [DI (r = .646), AA (r = .973)], all ps < .05]. The number of years worked as an EA was negatively associated with the total intervention hours for both groups. Qualitative interview data indicated that most EAs found DI valuable and feasible to deliver in their classrooms, whereas more implementation challenges were identified with AA. Barriers common to both groups included technical difficulties (e.g., game access, internet firewalls), environmental barriers (e.g., distractions in surroundings, time of the year), child factors (e.g., lack of motivation, attentional difficulties, frustration), and game-specific factors (e.g., difficulty level progression). Barriers specific to DI included greater challenges in motivating children as a function of difficulty level progression. Furthermore, given the comprehensive nature of training required for delivery, EAs needed a longer time to complete the training for DI. Nevertheless, many EAs in the DI group found the training helpful, with a potential to generalize to other children in the classroom.

The availability of affordable, accessible, and effective cognitive intervention is important for children with NDDs. We found that delivery of a novel cognitive intervention by EAs was feasible and acceptable, with similarities and differences in implementation facilitators/barriers between the cognitive and commercialized academic intervention. Recommendations regarding strategies for successful school-based implementation of neurocognitive intervention will be elaborated on in the poster.