In its desire to reduce the loss and expense involved in the occurrence of accidents, organized society is likely to consider various factors determining the nature of the rules (whether legal or other) that will guide it in its decision. These factors may include moral fault (in the accepted meaning of the term), economic fault or the relative wealth of the parties involved in causing the loss.
The purpose of this article is to examine the third factor, ie‥ relative wealth. By “relative wealth of the parties” we mean the quantity of property of monetary value in the hands of each of the parties relative to the aggregate property of the other parties and to the property of each. The parties in question are not necessarily those physically involved in causing the damage but those persons or groups which the rules for allocation of loss regard as potential bearers of the loss.