Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-07T20:08:25.010Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Naturalizing the normative and the bridges between “is” and “ought”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 October 2011

Katinka J. P. Quintelier  and
Daniel M. T. Fessler
Katinka J. P. Quintelier
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy and Moral Sciences, and Research Unit, “The Moral Brain”, Ghent University, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium. [email protected]://users.ugent.be/~kquintel
Daniel M. T. Fessler
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, and Center for Behavior, Evolution, & Culture, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1553. [email protected]://www.sscnet.ucla.edu/anthro/faculty/fessler
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Elqayam & Evans (E&E) suggest descriptivism as a way to avoid fallacies and research biases. We argue, first, that descriptive and prescriptive theories might be better off with a closer interaction between “is” and “ought.” Moreover, while we acknowledge the problematic nature of the discussed fallacies and biases, important aspects of research would be lost through a broad application of descriptivism.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 34 , Issue 5 , October 2011 , pp. 266
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Harman, G. (1975) Moral relativism defended. The Philosophical Review 84(1):3–22.Google Scholar
Hume, D. (1739–1740) A treatise of human nature. Being an attempt to introduce the experimental method of reasoning into moral subjects. Available at: http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/4705.Google Scholar
Moore, G. E. (1903) Principia Ethica. Available at: http://fair-use.org/g-e-moore/principia-ethica Google Scholar
Prinz, J. J. (2007) The emotional construction of morals. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar