Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:26:26.756Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Responses, A Symposium on Michael Rosen's The Shadow of God: Kant, Hegel, and the Passage from Heaven to History – ERRATUM

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 October 2023

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Correction
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of University of Notre Dame

This articleFootnote 1 omits three in-text citations, which should have read as follows:

Pages 571–572: “The short answer to one of Keum's perceptive questions—why talk about doxai?—is, as she rightly notes, that doxa is meant to be ‘a deliberately expansive term’ (562–63).”

Page 574: “I call this “Socratism” and it seems to me pretty much what Taylor himself means by ‘the eruption of radical criticism into human history’ (568).

The picture that Taylor gives is that moral progress is based on the erosion of particularisms: the emergence of an idea of a universal good, giving ‘a standpoint outside the existing society from which it could be criticized’ (567).”

The publisher apologizes for these errors.

References

1 Rosen, M. (2023). Author's Response. The Review of Politics, 571575. doi:10.1017/S0034670523000335Google Scholar