Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T12:53:18.996Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Should we avoid colleagues in leisure time during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 November 2020

Lotta-Maria A. H. Oksanen*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Phoniatrics – Head and Neck Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
Enni Sanmark
Affiliation:
Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Phoniatrics – Head and Neck Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
Sampo A. Oksanen
Affiliation:
Nordic Healthcare Group, Helsinki, Finland
Veli-Jukka Anttila
Affiliation:
Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland Inflammation Center, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
Jussi J. Paterno
Affiliation:
Department of Ophthalmology, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland Faculty of Medicine, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
Lasse Lehtonen
Affiliation:
Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland Diagnostic Center, HUSLAB, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
Ahmed Geneid
Affiliation:
Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Phoniatrics – Head and Neck Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
*
Author for correspondence: Lotta-Maria Adele Helena Oksanen, E-mail: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Letter to the Editor
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America

To the Editor— Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a significant occupational threat for healthcare workers (HCWs). Reference Adams and Walls1 The high number of infected HCWs has been explained with occupational exposure to severe acute respiratory coronavirus virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Hospitals have implemented infection control measures including proper personal protective equipment (PPE), universal masking in hospitals, and safety distance between coworkers to reduce the transmission. Reference Chu, Akl and Duda2,3 However, studies of HCW exposure to COVID-19 outside the workplace have not been published.

We examined HCW occupational and nonoccupational exposures to SARS-CoV-2 in tertiary-care hospitals (Uusimaa, Finland) during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic through July 15, 2020. Of 1,072 HCWs enrolled in our study, 866 nurses, midwives, and doctors from the Helsinki University Hospital answered questionnaires by July 15, 2020, regarding their infection symptoms, workplace, exposure to COVID-19, and use of PPE. All participants presenting any COVID-19–related symptoms were tested using standard reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) methods. Reference Mannonen, Kallio-Kokko and Loginov4 Participants’ medical histories were reviewed in July 2020 for SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR and antibody results. The demographic backgrounds of the participants were similar to those of Helsinki University Hospital (HUS) personnel overall. Reference Oksanen, Sanmark and Oksanen5

All infected participants were contacted, and the results were confirmed and analyzed. COVID-19 exposure was divided into workplace exposure, outside the workplace exposure, or unknown exposure and further into colleague-related exposure, patient-related exposure, or other exposure. The statistical analysis was performed using the Fisher exact test with SPSS version 27 software (IBM, Armonk, NY).

Overall, 41 participants had COVID-19 and presented either a SARS-CoV-2–positive RT-PCR or antibody test. Of these 41 HCWs, 22 were likely infected at a workplace and 15 were likely infected outside the workplace; the rest remained unclear. The source of infection was likely nonpatient exposure for 21 infected participants (51%). The absolute risk for colleague-origin COVID-19 in this sample was 1.4%, whereas overall regional risk was 0.3%. Reference Oksanen, Sanmark and Oksanen5 Also, 7 workplace-related infections (32%) and 5 infections originating outside the workplace (33%) were transmitted by colleagues.

In our sample, if the source of COVID-19 infection was not a patient, the infection was more likely to be from a colleague (P < .001), and 42% of infections from a colleague occurred during leisure time. Notably, participants who treated COVID-19 patients (outside the ICU) had an increased risk for COVID-19 overall (OR, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.4–5.2; P = .003), but even then, 5 of 26 COVID-19 cases (19%) were transmitted by colleagues outside the workplace.

Although it may seem self-evident, meeting with other HCWs outside the workplace could introduce an independent risk for a COVID-19 infection, especially among those working with COVID-19 patients. Given the close work communities in health care, where social interactions at work and leisure are traditionally easily mixed, the risk of free-time interactions between workers who work with COVID-19 patients should be carefully considered. In this study, we were unable to provide enough evidence for the authoritative guidance to employees because the sample size was limited. Also, it is likely that some asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2–positive participants were not recognized. Nonetheless, it is imperative to observe social distance in collegial interaction in leisure time until there is an effective vaccine against COVID-19.

Acknowledgments

We thank Catharina Pomoell for her great work as a research nurse and Johan Sanmark for his support. We also thank all participants involved in this study and their help to find ways to ensure safe working environment.

Financial support

This work was supported by the Helsinki University Hospital Research Fund (grant no. Y1014KN025).

Conflicts of interest

All authors report no conflicts of interest relevant to this article.

References

Adams, JG, Walls, RM. Supporting the healthcare workforce during the COVID-19 global epidemic. JAMA 2020;323:14391440.10.1001/jama.2020.3972CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chu, DK, Akl, EA, Duda, S, et al. Physical distancing, face masks, and eye protection to prevent person-to-person transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 2020;395:19731987.10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31142-9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Advice on the use of mask in the context of COVID-19. World Health Organization website. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/advice-on-the-use-of-masks-in-the-community-during-home-care-and-in-healthcare-settings-in-the-context-of-the-novel-coronavirus-(2019-ncov)-outbreak. Published May 6, 2020. Accessed November 11, 2020.Google Scholar
Mannonen, L, Kallio-Kokko, H, Loginov, R, et al. Comparison of two commercial platforms and a laboratory developed test for detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA. medRxiv 2020. doi: 10.1101/2020.07.03.20144758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oksanen, L, Sanmark, E, Oksanen, S, et al. Healthcare workers high COVID-19 infection rate: the source of infections and potential for respirators and surgical masks to reduce occupational infections. medRxiv 2020. doi: 10.1101/2020.08.17.20176842.Google Scholar