Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wtssw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-27T14:25:10.187Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Antagonistic Effect of Atrazine and Simazine on Glyphosate Activity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

A. P. Appleby
Affiliation:
Dep. of Crop Sci., Oregon State Univ., Corvallis, OR 97331
Montien Somabhi
Affiliation:
Dep. of Crop Sci., Oregon State Univ., Corvallis, OR 97331

Abstract

The addition of simazine [2-chloro-4,6-bis(ethylamino)-s-triazine] wettable powder to water solutions of glyphosate [N-(phosphonomethyl)glycine] in greenhouse studies reduced glyphosate activity on quackgrass [Agropyron repens (L.) Beavu.], corn (Zea mays L.), and beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Atrazine [2-chloro-4-(ethylamino)-6-isopropylamino)-s-triazine] wettable powder reduced glyphosate activity on corn. This antagonism was more pronounced at threshold levels of glyphosate and was overcome by increasing the glyphosate rate. Simazine applied to corn through the soil did not reduce the activity of glyphosate applied to the foliage. Glyphosate activity on corn was reduced equally when glyphosate was mixed with 4.2 kg/ha of commercial simazine wettable powder or an equal amount of the inert ingredients used in the commercial product. When mixtures of glyphosate with either the commercial simazine product or the inert ingredients from the commercial product were centrifuged, the amount of phosphorus (used as a measure of glyphosate) in the supernatant was reduced by 10 to 20%. When the supernatants of the various mixtures were applied to bean plants, the reduced phytotoxicity from the mixtures was comparable to the antagonism noted in previous experiments. These data support the conclusion that the reduction in glyphosate phytotoxicity from mixing with atrazine or simazine wettable powders is due to a physical binding within the spray solution rather than from biological interactions within the plant.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1978 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Arenstein, Z. 1976. Effect of combinations of glyphosate and diuron on the control of Cynodon dactylon in avocado and pecan orchards. Abstr., Phytoparasitica 4:153.Google Scholar
2. Baird, D. D., Upchurch, R. P., Homesley, W. B., and Franz, J. E. 1971. Introduction of a new broadspectrum postemergence herbicide class with utility for herbaceous perennial weed control. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 26:6468.Google Scholar
3. Bartlett, G. R. 1959. Phosphorus assay in column chromatography. J. Biol. Chem. 234:466468.Google Scholar
4. Brewster, B. D. and Appleby, A. P. 1972. Preemergence soil activity of N-phosphonomethylglycine on winter wheat. West. Soc. Weed Sci. Res. Prog. Rpt. p. 90.Google Scholar
5. Hance, R. J. 1976. Adsorption of glyphosate by soils. Pestic. Sci. 7:363366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Radosevich, S. R. and Appleby, A. P. 1973. Studies on the mechanism of resistance to simazine in common groundsel. Weed Sci. 21:497500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Sprankle, P., Meggitt, W. F., and Penner, D. 1975. Rapid inactivation of glyphosate in the soil. Weed Sci. 23:224228.Google Scholar
8. Upchurch, R. P. and Baird, D. D. 1972. Herbicidal action of MON-0573 as influenced by light and soil. Proc. West. Soc. Weed Sci. 25:4144.Google Scholar