Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T12:56:15.387Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The rotation curve, mass, light, and velocity distribution of M31

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 August 2015

J. Einasto  and
U. Rümmel
J. Einasto
Affiliation:
W. Struve Astrophysical Observatory, Tartu, Estonian S.S.R.
U. Rümmel
Affiliation:
W. Struve Astrophysical Observatory, Tartu, Estonian S.S.R.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A model for the Andromeda galaxy, M 31, has been derived from the available radio, photometric, and spectroscopic data. The model consists of four components – the nucleus, the bulge, the disc, and the flat component.

For all components the following functions have been found: the mass density; the mass-to-light ratio; the velocity dispersions in three perpendicular directions (for the plane of symmetry and the axis of the galaxy); the deviation angle of the major axis of the velocity ellipsoid from the plane of symmetry; the centroid velocity (for the plane of symmetry).

Our model differs in two points from the models obtained by other authors: the central concentration of mass is higher (in the nucleus the mass-to-light ratio is about 170), and the total mass of the galaxy (200 × 109 solar masses) is smaller. The differences can be explained by different rotation curves adopted, and by attributing more weight to photometric and spectroscopic data in the case of our model.

Type
Part I/Spiral Structure in Galaxies
Information
Symposium - International Astronomical Union , Volume 38: The Spiral Structure of our Galaxy , 1970 , pp. 51 - 60
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1970 

References

Arp, H.: 1964, Astrophys. J. 139, 1045.Google Scholar
Ambartsumian, V. A.: 1958, in La structure et l'évolution de l'univers, Stoops, Bruxelles, p. 241.Google Scholar
Baade, W. and Arp, H.: 1964, Astrophys. J. 139, 1027.Google Scholar
Baade, W. and Swope, H. H.: 1963, Astron. J. 68, 435.Google Scholar
Brandt, J. C. and Scheer, L. S.: 1965, Astron. J. 70, 471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Einasto, J.: 1968a, Publ. Tartu Astron. Obs. 36, 357.Google Scholar
Einasto, J.: 1968b, Publ. Tartu Astron. Obs. 36, 442.Google Scholar
Einasto, J.: 1969a, Astron. Nachr. 291, 97.Google Scholar
Einasto, J.: 1969b, Astrofiz. 5, 137.Google Scholar
Einasto, J.: 1969c, Astrofiz., in press.Google Scholar
Einasto, J.: 1970, in preparation.Google Scholar
Einasto, J. and Rümmel, U.: 1969, Astrofiz., in press.Google Scholar
Gottesman, S. T., Davies, R. D., and Reddish, V. C.: 1966, Monthly Notices Roy. Astron. Soc. 133, 359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, I.: 1962, Astron. J. 67, 471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuzmin, G.: 1953, Publ. Tartu Astron. Obs. 32, 332.Google Scholar
Kuzmin, G.: 1961, Publ. Tartu Astron. Obs. 33, 351.Google Scholar
Kuzmin, G.: 1964, Publ. Tartu Astron. Obs. 34, 10.Google Scholar
Roberts, M. S.: 1966, Astrophys. J. 144, 639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, M.: 1957, Bull. Astron. Inst. Netherl. 14, 17.Google Scholar
Spinrad, H.: 1966, Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacific 78, 367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar