Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-pkt8n Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-19T08:38:12.362Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Dipole Anisotropy in the Lick galaxy catalogue

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 August 2017

Manolis Plionis*
Affiliation:
Astronomy Centre, University of Sussex, Brighton, BN1 9QH, U.K.

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The Shane & Wirtanen (SW) galaxy catalog, as reduced by Seldner et al (SSGP), is used to calculate the dipole vector of the galaxy distribution. The catalogue covers 86% of the North and 53% of the South Galactic cap (totally 8.8 steradians) and contains about 810,000 galaxies binned in 10′ × 10′ cells with magnitude limit mB ∼ 18.8. Dipoles have been found in the IRAS and in an optical catalogue based on the ESO, UGC and MCG catalogues, with average depths of ∼ 100 h−1 and ∼ 50 h−1 Mpc respectively. The direction of these dipoles is consistent with that of the microwave background dipole which means that the structures responsible for the dipole are present within the limits of the shallower catalogue and dominate the large-scale morpology of the galaxy distribution in both catalogues. It can therefore be expected that these structures will be ‘washed out’ by more distant structures dominating the deeper SW catalogue. The characteristic depth of the SW catalogue is 360 h−1 and the median depth of a cluster sample, identified from the SW catalogue by an objective proccedure, is ∼ 180 h−1 Mpc. Even if a dipole is found there is no apparent reason for it to point towards the MWB dipole direction since other galaxy fluctuations, comparable in size with those responsible for the MWB dipole, should be present in the SW catalogue if the Cosmological Principle is relevant on scales traced by the catalogue.

Type
Appendix 1: Poster Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1988 

References

[1] Shane, C.D. and Wirtanen, C.A. 1967 Publ.LickObs. Vol.XXII, Part 1 Google Scholar
[2] Seldner, M., Siebers, B., Groth, E.J., Peebles, P.J.E. 1977 Astron.J. 84, p.249 Google Scholar
[3] Yahil, A., Walker, D., Rowan-Robinson, M. 1986 Astrophys.J. 301, L1 Google Scholar
[4] Meiksin, A. and Davis, M. 1986 Astron.J. 91, No2, p.191 Google Scholar
[5] Lahav, O. 1987 Mon.Not.R.astr.Soc. 225, p.213 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6] Lawrence, A., Walker, D. and Rowan-Robinson, M., Leech, K.J., and Penston, M.V. 1986 Mon.Not.R.astr.Soc. 219, p.687 Google Scholar
[7] Shectman, S. 1985 Astrophys.J. Suppl. 57, p.77 Google Scholar
[8] de Lapparent, V., Kurtz, M.J. and Geller, M.J. 1986 Astrophys.J. 304, p.585 Google Scholar
[9] Groth, E.J. and Peebles, P.J.E. 1986b Astrophys.J. 310, p.507 Google Scholar
[10] Plionis, M. 1987 in preparation Google Scholar