Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-5wvtr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T22:44:09.098Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Advances in Studies of Physical Processes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 September 2016

M.J. Seaton*
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The forbidden lines in planetary nebulae are due to transitions between energy levels belonging to configurations ns2npq with q = 1 to 5, and with n = 2 ([O II], [O III], …) or n = 3 ([S II], [S III], …). For electron impact excitation of these levels, the expansion

Type
Session III: Physical Processes
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1978 

References

1. Berrington, K.A., Burke, P.G., Chang, J.J., Chivers, A.T., Robb, W.D. and Taylor, K.T., 1974, Comp. Phys. Comm., 8, 149.Google Scholar
2. Seaton, M.J., 1974, J. Phys. B., 7, 1817.Google Scholar
3. LeDourneuf, M., Lan, Vo Ky and Burke, P.G., 1977, J. Phys. B., in Press.Google Scholar
4. Pequignot, D. and Aldrovandi, S.M., 1976, Astron. Astrophys., 50, 141.Google Scholar
5. Seaton, M.J., Mon. Not. R. Astr. Soc., 1975, 170, 475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Pradhan, A.K., 1976, Mon. Not. R. Astr. Soc., 177, 31.Google Scholar
7. Robb, W.D., 1975, J. Phys. B., 8, L46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Krueger, T.K. and Czyzak, S.J., 1970, Proc. Roy. Soc., A318, 531.Google Scholar
9. Brocklehurst, M., Mon. Not. R. Astr. Soc., 160, 19P.Google Scholar
10. Conneely, M.J., Smith, K. and Lipsky, L., J. Phys. B., 3, 493.Google Scholar
11. Seaton, M.J. and Osterbrock, D.E., 1957, Astrophys. J., 125, 66.Google Scholar
12. Miller, J.S., 1971, private communication to M. Brocklehurst.Google Scholar
13. Zeippen, C.J., 1976, private communication.Google Scholar
14. Dopita, M.A., Mason, D.J. and Robb, W.D., 1976, Astron. Astrophys., 207, 102.Google Scholar
15. Gabriel, A.H. and Jordan, C., 1969, Nature, 221, 947.Google Scholar
16. Drake, G.W.F., 1972, Phys. Rev. A5, 1979.Google Scholar
17. Eissner, W. and Zeippen, C.J., 1976, private communication.Google Scholar
18. Brocklehurst, M., 1971, Mon. Not. R. Astr. Soc., 153, 471.Google Scholar
19. Giles, K., 1977, Mon. Not. R. Astr. Soc., in press.Google Scholar
20. Lockman, F. J. and Brown, R.L., 1975, Astrophys. J. 201, 134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. Churchwell, E., Terzian, Y. and Walmsley, M., 1976, Astron. Astrophys., 48, 331.Google Scholar
22. Brocklehurst, M. and Salem, M., 1975, Comp. Phys. Comm., 9, 258.Google Scholar
23. Grandi, S.A., 1976, Astrophys. J., 206, 658.Google Scholar
24. Kaler, J.B., 1972, Astrophys. J., 173, 601.Google Scholar
25. Peimbert, M. and Torres-Peimbert, S., 1977, Mon: Not. R. Astr. Soc., 179, 217.Google Scholar
26. Torres-Peimbert, S. and Peimbert, M., 1977, Rev. Mex. Astron. Astrofis., in press.Google Scholar
27. Pengelly, R.M., 1963, , London.Google Scholar
28. Kaler, J.B., Aller, L.H., Czyzak, S.J. and Epps, H.W., 1976, Astrophys. J. Suppl., 31, 163.Google Scholar
29. Burke, P.G., in “Atomic processes and applications” (ed. Burke, P.G. and Moiseiwitsch, B.L.), 1976, p.199, North-Holland.Google Scholar
30. Taylor, K.T. and Burke, P.G., 1976, J. Phys. B., 9, L353.Google Scholar
31. Le Dourneuf, M., Lan, Vo Ky and Hibbert, A., 1976, J. Phys. B., 9, L359.Google Scholar
32. Pradhan, A.K. and Saraph, H.E., 1977, J. Phys. B., submitted.Google Scholar