Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T20:16:28.878Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

I-DAQ: a New Test to Assess Direct and Indirect Aggression Free of Response Bias

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 July 2014

Mireia Ruiz-Pamies ,
Urbano Lorenzo-Seva ,
Fabia Morales-Vives ,
Sandra Cosi  and
Andreu Vigil-Colet
Mireia Ruiz-Pamies
Affiliation:
Universitat Rovira i Virgili (Spain)
Urbano Lorenzo-Seva
Affiliation:
Universitat Rovira i Virgili (Spain)
Fabia Morales-Vives
Affiliation:
Universitat Rovira i Virgili (Spain)
Sandra Cosi
Affiliation:
Universitat Rovira i Virgili (Spain)
Andreu Vigil-Colet*
Affiliation:
Universitat Rovira i Virgili (Spain)
*
*Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Andreu Vigil-Colet. Centre de Recerca en Avaluació i Mesura de la Conducta. Unversitat Rovira i Virgili. Departamento de Psicologia. Crtra. Valls s/n. 43007. Tarragona (Spain). E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Self-reports of aggression are deeply impacted by response bias, especially by social desirability, but there are no specific methods for controlling this bias. Furthermore, despite the importance of the subject few instruments have been designed to assess both direct and indirect forms of aggression. The aim of the present research was to develop a brief measure that comprises both forms of aggression and which makes it possible to obtain scores free of social desirability and acquiescence effects. The scales were created using recently developed methods for controlling response bias effects in a sample of 750 participants over a wide age range. The items were chosen by a panel of judges from among the best of the existing aggression measures. Confirmatory factor analysis showed the expected three factor structure (CFI = .98; AGFI = .97 and RSMEA = .078, 90% C.I. = .074 – .083) and the scales showed good psychometric properties in that they had good reliability (ranging from θxx = .77 to θxx = .83), and convergent and criterion validity.

Keywords

direct aggressionindirect aggressionsocial desirabilityacquiescence
Type
Research Article
Information
The Spanish Journal of Psychology , Volume 17 , 2014 , E41
Copyright
Copyright © Universidad Complutense de Madrid and Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos de Madrid 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anguiano-Carrasco, C., & Vigil-Colet, A. (2011). Assessing indirect aggression in aggressors and targets: Spanish adaptation of the Indirect Aggression Scales. Psicothema, 23, 146–152.Google Scholar
Aquino, K., & Thau, S. (2009). Workplace victimization: Aggression from the target's perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 717–741. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163703 Google Scholar
Archer, J. (2004). Sex differences in real-world settings: A meta-analytic review. Review of General Psychology, 8, 291–332. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.8.4.291 Google Scholar
Becker, G. (2007). The Buss-Perry Aggression Questionnaire: Some unfinished business. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 434–452. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2006.05.004 Google Scholar
Bettencourt, B. A., Talley, A., Benjamin, A. J., & Valentine, J. (2006). Personality and aggressive behavior under provoking and neutral conditions: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 751–777. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.5.751 Google Scholar
Buss, A. H., & Durkee, A. (1957). An inventory for assessing different kinds of hostility. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 21, 343–349. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0046900 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buss, A. H., & Perry, M. (1992).The Aggression Questionnaire. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 452–459. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.63.3.452 Google Scholar
Cangas, C., Gázquez, J. J., Pérez-Fuentes, M. C., Padilla, D., & Miras, F. (2007). Evaluación de la violencia escolar y su afectación personal en una muestra de estudiantes europeos [Evaluation of school violence and its personal involvement in a sample of European students]. Psicothema, 19, 114–119.Google Scholar
Chico, E., Tous, J. M., Lorenzo-Seva, U., & Vigil-Colet, A. (2003). Spanish adaptation of Dickman’s Impulsivity Inventory, its relationship to Eysenck’s Personality Questionnaire. Personality and Individual Differences, 35, 1883–1892. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(03)00037-0 Google Scholar
Condon, L., Morales-Vives, F., Ferrando, P. J., & Vigil-Colet, A. (2006). Sex differences in the full and reduced versions of the Aggression Questionnaire: A question of differential item functioning? European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 22, 92–97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759.22.2.92.Google Scholar
Connelly, C. D., Newton, R. R., & Aarons, G. A. (2005). A psychometric examination of English and Spanish versions of the revised Conflict Tactics Scales. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20, 1560–1579. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0886260505280341 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cosi, S., Hernández-Martínez, C., Canals, J., & Vigil-Colet, A. (2011). Impulsivity and internalizing disorders in childhood. Psychiatry Research, 190, 342–347. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2011.05.036 Google Scholar
Ferrando, P. J., & Lorenzo-Seva, U. (2000). Unrestricted versus restricted factor analysis of multidimensional test items: Some aspects of the problem and some suggestions. Psicológica, 21, 301–323.Google Scholar
Ferrando, P. J., & Lorenzo-Seva, U. (2010). Acquiescence as a source of bias and model and person misfit: A theoretical and empirical analysis. British Journal of Mathematical Statistical Psychology, 63, 427–448. http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/000711009X470740 Google Scholar
Ferrando, P. J., Lorenzo-Seva, U., & Chico, E. (2009). A general factor-analytic procedure for assessing response bias in questionnaire measures. Structural Equation Modeling, 16, 364–381. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10705510902751374 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, J. A. (1997). Further evaluation of the Aggression Questionnaire: Issues of validity and reliability. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 35, 1047–1053. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7967(97)00064-8 Google Scholar
Hopwood, C. J., & Donnellan, M. B. (2010). How should the internal structure of personality inventories be evaluated? Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 332–346. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1088868310361240 Google Scholar
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118 Google Scholar
Infante, D. A., & Wigley, C. J. (1986). Verbal aggressiveness: An interpersonal model and measure. Communication Monographs, 53, 61–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03637758609376126 Google Scholar
Kaukiainen, A., Salmivalli, C., Björkqvist, K., Österman, K., Lahtinen, A., Kostamo, A., & Lagerspeltz, K. (2001). Overt and covert aggression in work settings in relation to the subjective well-being of employees. Aggressive Behavior, 27, 360–371. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ab.1021.abs Google Scholar
Keenan, K., Coyne, C., & Lahey, B. B. (2008). Should relational aggression be included in DSM-V? Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 47, 86–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/chi.0b013e31815a56b8 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lawrence, C. (2006). Measuring individual responses to aggression-triggering events: Development of the Situational Triggers of Aggressive Responses (STAR) scale. Aggressive Behavior, 32, 241–252. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ab.20122 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leite, W. L., & Cooper, L. A. (2010). Detecting social desirability bias using factor mixture models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 45, 271–293. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00273171003680245 Google Scholar
Lobo, P., Saz, P., Marcos, G., Día, J. L., Cámara, C., Ventura, T., & Aznar, S. (1999). Re-validation and norms of the mini-examen cognoscitivo in elderly people. Medicina Clínica, 112, 767–774.Google Scholar
Morales-Vives, F., & Vigil-Colet, A. (2010). Are there sex differences in physical aggression in the elderly? Personality and Individual Differences, 49, 659–662. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.05.034 Google Scholar
Sharpe, J. P., & Desai, S. (2001). The revised Neo Personality Inventory and the MMPI-2 Psychopathology Five in the prediction of aggression. Personality and Individual Differences, 31, 505–518. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(00)00155-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soubelet, A., & Salthouse, T. A. (2011). Influence of social desirability on age differences in self-reports of mood and personality. Journal of Personality, 79, 741–762. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2011.00700.x Google Scholar
Teisl, M., Rogosch, F. A., Oshri, A., & Cicchetti, D. (2012). Differential expression of social dominance as a function of age and maltreatment experience. Developmental Psychology, 48, 575–588. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0024888 Google Scholar
Ten Berge, J. M. F., Krijnen, W. P., Wansbeek, T., & Shapiro, A. (1999). Some new results on correlation-preserving factor scores prediction methods. Linear Algebra and its Applications, 289, 311–318. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0024-3795(97)10007-6 Google Scholar
Toldos, M. P. (2005). Sex and age differences in self-estimated physical, verbal and indirect aggression in Spanish adolescents. Aggressive Behavior, 31, 13–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ab.20034 Google Scholar
Vigil-Colet, A., Lorenzo-Seva, U., Codorniu-Raga, M. J., & Morales-Vives, F. (2005). Factor structure of the Buss-Perry Aggression Questionnaire in different samples and languages. Aggressive Behavior, 31, 601–608. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ab.20097 Google Scholar
Vigil-Colet, A., Morales-Vives, F., Camps, E., Tous, J., & Lorenzo-Seva, U. (2013). Development and validation of the Overall Personality Assessment Scale (OPERAS). Psicothema, 25, 100–106. http://dx.doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2011.411 Google Scholar
Vigil-Colet, A., Morales-Vives, F., & Tous, J. (2008). The relationships between functional and dysfunctional impulsivity and aggression across different samples. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 11, 480–487.Google Scholar
Vigil-Colet, A., Ruiz-Pàmies, M., Anguiano-Carrasco, C., & Lorenzo-Seva, U. (2012). The impact of social desirability on psychometric measures of aggression. Psicothema, 24, 310–315.Google Scholar
Warren, P., Richardson, D. S., & McQuillin, S. (2011). Distinguishing among nondirect forms of aggression. Aggressive Behavior, 37, 291–301. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ab.20394 Google Scholar