Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-31T13:25:01.241Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A potentially useful distribution model for dietary intake data

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 December 2006

JP Myles ,
GM Price ,
N Hunter ,
M Day  and
SW Duffy
JP Myles*
Affiliation:
Cancer Research UK Department of Epidemiology, Mathematics and Statistics, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Charterhouse Square, London EC1M 6BQ, UK
GM Price
Affiliation:
Epidemiology Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
N Hunter
Affiliation:
MRC Biostatistics Unit Cambridge (now at National Radiological Protection Board, Chiltern, UK)
M Day
Affiliation:
Food Standards Agency, London, UK
SW Duffy
Affiliation:
Cancer Research UK Department of Epidemiology, Mathematics and Statistics, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Charterhouse Square, London EC1M 6BQ, UK
*
*Corresponding author: Email [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Background:

Conventional mixed models for the analysis of diet diary data have introduced several simplifying assumptions, such as that of a single standard deviation for within-person day-to-day variation which is common to all individuals.

Objective:

We developed a model in which the within-person standard deviation was allowed to differ from person to person.

Design:

The model was demonstrated using data on daily retinol intake from the Dietary and Nutritional Survey of British Adults. The data were from 7-day weighed dietary diaries. Estimation was performed by Markov chain Monte Carlo. Reliability of the model was assessed from the accuracy of estimation of the percentage of days on which various intakes were exceeded. For levels above the median retinol intake, estimation of percentages of days with excessive intakes was most accurate using the model with varying within-person standard deviation.

Setting:

A survey of British adults aged 16–64 years.

Subjects:

In total 2197 adults living in the UK, 1087 males and 1110 females.

Results:

Under the traditional model, estimated daily intake ranged from 716.4 to 1421.8 μg depending on age and sex, with a within-person standard deviation of 4298.9 μg. Under the new model, estimated average daily intake ranged from 388.9 to 518.3 μg depending on age and sex, but with a within-person standard deviation varying between subjects with a 95% range of 29 to 8384 μg. The new model was shown to predict the percentage of days of exceeding large intakes more successfully than the traditional model. For example, the percentage of days of exceeding the maximum recommended intake (9000 μg for men and 7500 μg for women) was 2.4%. The traditional model predicted no excessive intakes, whereas the new model predicted 2.9%.

Conclusions:

This model is potentially useful in dietary research in general and for analysis of data on chemical contaminants in foods, in particular.

Keywords

Retinol intakeIntra-subject variabilityStatistical models
Type
Research Article
Information
Public Health Nutrition , Volume 6 , Issue 5 , August 2003 , pp. 513 - 519
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2003

References

1Spiegelhalter, DJ, Thomas, A, Best, NG, Gilks, WR. BUGS: Bayesian Inference using Gibbs Sampling, Version 0.50. Technical Report. Cambridge: Medical Research Council Biostatistics Unit, 1996.Google Scholar
2Nelson, M, Bingham, SA. Assessment of food consumption and nutrient intake. In: Margetts, BM, Nelson, M, eds. Design Concepts in Nutritional Epidemiology, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997; 123–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3Bingham, S, Gill, C, Welch, A, Day, K, Cassidy, A, Khaw, KT, et al. Comparison of dietary assessment methods in nutritional epidemiology, weighed records v. 24h recalls, food frequency questionnaires and estimated diet records. British Journal of Nutrition 1994; 72: 619–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Gregory, J, Forster, K, Tyler, H, Wiseman, M. The Dietary and Nutritional Survey of British Adults. London: HM Stationery Office, 1990.Google Scholar
5StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software: Release 7.0. College Station, TX: Stata Corporation, 2001.Google Scholar
6Price, G. An investigation into the determination of energy intake and its variability in British adults. Master's thesis, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, 2000.Google Scholar
7Gilks, WR, Richardson, S, Spiegelhalter, DJ, eds. Markov Chain Monte Carlo in Practice. London: Chapman & Hall, 1996.Google Scholar