Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-k7p5g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-08T20:17:32.351Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Comparative voluntary intake and in vivo digestibility in guanacos (Lama guanicoe) and sheep

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 November 2021

M.D. Fraser
Affiliation:
Institute of Grassland and Environmental Research, Plas Gogerddan, Aberystwyth, Ceredigion SY23 3EB, UK
D.H. Baker
Affiliation:
Institute of Grassland and Environmental Research, Plas Gogerddan, Aberystwyth, Ceredigion SY23 3EB, UK
Get access

Extract

Digestibility studies conducted with South American camelids on conserved forages have identified lower intakes and higher digestion coefficients in comparison with sheep when fed low and medium quality diets (Hintz, Schryver and Halbert, 1973; San Martin and Bryant, 1989). However, such experiments often involve only one or two animals. There are no published reports of detailed comparative in vivo trials based on fresh forage. The aim of this study was to compare the voluntary intake and digestion coefficients of guanacos and sheep when zero-grazed on a comparatively high quality ryegrass sward at three different growth stages.

Type
Programme
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Hintz, H.F., Schryver, H.F. and Halbert, M. (1973) A note on the comparison of digestion by New World camels, sheep and ponies. Animal Production 16: 303305.Google Scholar
San Martin, F. and Bryant, F.C. (1989) Nutrition of domesticated llamas and alpacas. Small Ruminant Research 2: 191216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar