Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Journals
  3. Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting
  4. Most cited
Journal Home
Refine listing
Publication date:
Apply   From and To filters

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

Most cited

This page lists all time most cited articles for this title. Please use the publication date filters on the left if you would like to restrict this list to recently published content, for example to articles published in the last three years. The number of times each article was cited is displayed to the right of its title and can be clicked to access a list of all titles this article has been cited by.

Contents

Page 26 of 59

  • Cited by 1

  • The Art of International Law

  • Hilary Charlesworth
  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    24 March 2023, pp. 7-24
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • HTML
    • Export citation

  • International lawyers study international law primarily through its written texts—treaties, official documents, judgments, and scholarly works. Critical to being an international lawyer, it seems, is access to the written word, whether in hard copy or online. Indeed, as Jesse Hohmann observes, “the production of text can come to feel like the very purpose of international law.”

  • Cited by 1
  • Cited by 1

  • Remarks by Judge James Crawford

  • Judge James Crawford
  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    28 March 2018, p. 140

  • A preliminary observation relates to the formalities of debating a question such as the present; in such a situation, the best way to win the debate is to interpret the motion such that you cannot lose. Those speaking for the motion have defined “expansive” as meaning undue or excessive, and no one would disagree with that proposition if that is the correct interpretation.

  • Cited by 1
  • Cited by 1
  • Cited by 1
  • Cited by 1
  • Cited by 1
  • Cited by 1
  • Cited by 1
  • Cited by 1
  • Cited by 1
  • Cited by 1
  • Cited by 1
  • Cited by 1
  • Cited by 1
  • Cited by 1
  • Cited by 1
  • Cited by 1
  • Cited by 1

Page 26 of 59