Article contents
The Implication of Common Heritage Concepts on the Quest for CulturalObjects and the Dialogue Between North and South
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 February 2017
Abstract
- Type
- When the Quest for Cultural Objects Divides North from South
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Society of International Law 1995
References
1 Batrov, P.M., An Essay on the International Trade in Art , 34 CTAN. L. R. 275–384 at 306 (1982)Google Scholar.
2 Declaration of the Principles of International Cultural Co-operation, adopted at the fourteenth session of the General Conference, November 4, 1966. Art. 1(3).
3 294 UNTS215.
4 11 ILM 1358 (1972).
5 Article 4.
6 21 ILM 58 (1982). Article 22(1)(1981).
7 S.A. Williams, The International And National Protection Of Movable Cultural Property: A Comparative Survey 201-202 (1967).
8 Koumantos, G., International Legal Protection of Cultural Property: Introductory Report, in Council Of Europe , International Legal Protection Of Cultural Property 12–16 at 14 (1984)Google Scholar.
9 Kiss, A-Ch., The Common Heritage of Mankind , 59 Rev. Jur. U.P.R. 773–777 (1990)Google Scholar.
10 218 UNTS 139
11 25 ILM 44 (1986). Europ. T. S. No 11
12 25 ILM 380 (1986). Europ. T. S. No 14
13 15 ILM 1350(1976).
14 Resolution 808 of October 3, 1983, paras. 9 and 11 in Council Of Europe, Texts Adopted By The Ssembly, Thirty-Fifth Ordinary Session (Second Part), (1983).
15 1993 O. J. (L 74) 74.
16 Roberts, E. L., Cultural Policy in the European Community: A Case Against Extensive National Retention , 28 Tex. Int’l L.J. 191–228 at 217-219 (1993)Google Scholar.
17 21 ILM 1245(1982).
18 In addition, the Convention fails to designate an appropriate international organization to implement the proposed regime. See, Strati, A., Deep Seabed Cultural Property and the Common Heritage of Mankind , 40 I.C.L.Q. 859–894(1991)Google Scholar.
19 E., Racounas, Submarine Archaelogical Research: Some Legal Aspects in The International Legal Regime Of The Mediterranean Sea 309–334 at 328 (U. Lebanza, ed., 1987)Google Scholar.
20 This is one of the main reasons that the inclusion of the preferential rights in Article 149 has been criticized. In particular see Watters, D.R., Law of the Sea Treaty and Underwater Cultural Resources , 48 American Antiquity 808–816 (1983)Google Scholar and Bass, G.F., Marine Archaeology: A Misunderstood Science , 2 Ocean Y.B. 137–152 (1980)Google Scholar.
21 1955 ICJ Rep. 4 at 22.
- 1
- Cited by