Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T10:00:40.105Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

OPTIMALITY OF CONTROL LIMIT MAINTENANCE POLICIES UNDER NONSTATIONARY DETERIORATION

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 1999

Zvi Benyamini
Affiliation:
Department of Statistics and Operations Research, School of Mathematical Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel
Uri Yechiali
Affiliation:
Department of Statistics and Operations Research, School of Mathematical Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel

Abstract

Control limit type policies are widely discussed in the literature, particularly regarding the maintenance of deteriorating systems. Previous studies deal mainly with stationary deterioration processes, where costs and transition probabilities depend only on the state of the system, regardless of its cumulative age. In this paper, we consider a nonstationary deterioration process, in which operation and maintenance costs, as well as transition probabilities “deteriorate” with both the system's state and its cumulative age. We discuss conditions under which control limit policies are optimal for such processes and compare them with those used in the analysis of stationary models.

Two maintenance models are examined: in the first (as in the majority of classic studies), the only maintenance action allowed is the replacement of the system by a new one. In this case, we show that the nonstationary results are direct generalizations of their counterparts in stationary models. We propose an efficient algorithm for finding the optimal policy, utilizing its control limit form. In the second model we also allow for repairs to better states (without changing the age). In this case, the optimal policy is shown to have the form of a 3-way control limit rule. However, conditions analogous to those used in the stationary problem do not suffice, so additional, more restrictive ones are suggested and discussed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1999 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)