To validate the Roth score as a triage tool for detecting hypoxaemia.

The virtual assessment of patients has become increasingly important during the corona virus disease (COVID-19) pandemic, but has limitations as to the evaluation of deteriorating respiratory function. This study presents data on the validity of the Roth score as a triage tool for detecting hypoxaemia remotely in potential COVID-19 patients in general practice.

This cross-sectional validation study was conducted in Dutch general practice. Patients aged ≥18 with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 were asked to rapidly count from 1 to 30 in a single breath. The Roth score involves the highest number counted during exhalation (counting number) and the time taken to reach the maximal count (counting time).

Outcome measures were (1) the correlation between both Roth score measurements and simultaneous pulse oximetry (SpO2) on room air and (2) discrimination (c-statistic), sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of the Roth score for detecting hypoxaemia (SpO2 < 95%).

A total of 33 physicians enrolled 105 patients (52.4% female, mean age of 52.6 ± 20.4 years). A positive correlation was found between counting number and SpO2 (rs = 0.44, P < 0.001), whereas only a weak correlation was found between counting time and SpO2 (rs = 0.15, P = 0.14). Discrimination for hypoxaemia was higher for counting number [c-statistic 0.91 (95% CI: 0.85–0.96)] than for counting time [c-statistic 0.77 (95% CI: 0.62–0.93)]. Optimal diagnostic performance was found at a counting number of 20, with a sensitivity of 93.3% (95% CI: 68.1–99.8) and a specificity of 77.8% (95% CI: 67.8–85.9). A counting time of 7 s showed the best sensitivity of 85.7% (95% CI: 57.2–98.2) and specificity of 81.1% (95% CI: 71.5–88.6).

A Roth score, with an optimal counting number cut-off value of 20, maybe of added value for signalling hypoxaemia in general practice. Further external validation is warranted before recommending integration in telephone triage.

Obesity is a major public health issue because of its increasing prevalence and impact on health. The management of overweight and obesity has been a government priority for many years. However, overweight and obesity management at a local level has often been ineffective. Although there is a need to examine obesity strategies and policies for local populations, there is currently no readily available framework for evaluating local obesity strategies. We therefore developed a framework, the Imperial College Obesity Strategy Assessment Framework (IC-OSAF), for examining the content of local obesity strategies.

We adapted two previous policy analysis frameworks (Bardach’s Eightfold Path Framework and Collins’ Health Policy Analysis Framework) and used these with information from national guidelines to develop an obesity strategy analysis framework. We then piloted this framework using the obesity strategy for one London primary care trust (PCT).

The framework was applied successfully and helped identify limitations and omissions in the PCT obesity management strategy.

The IC-OSAF is a practical, easy-to-use tool for the analysis of local obesity management strategies. The framework can help identify gaps and limitations in strategies to help reduce variations in obesity management between PCTs.

Although there is existing activity within the NHS and local communities to support self-care there has been no previous attempt at integration across a Primary Care Trust (PCT). The Joining Up Self-Care (JUSC) study aimed to implement and evaluate such a programme.

Three self-care support modules for members of the public, together with a training course for primary care teams, were developed with, and implemented in, one PCT. The modules related to disease prevention (community-based coronary heart disease (CHD) prevention), care of people with long-term conditions (a disease-specific self-care skills training course for asthma) and the management of minor ailments aimed at mothers of children aged 3 months to 12 years (the ‘Pharmacy First’ service plus information booklets and campaigns). Postal questionnaires were completed by participants in CHD prevention (178), management of asthma (76) and minor ailments management (92), and by controls. A general population survey (n = 540) provided a comparison group for the CHD module and assessed general awareness of local self-care support. Four focus groups were held with mothers of young children. An audit of general practitioner (GP) records was conducted for consultations for minor ailments. Structured telephone interviews were conducted with 51 local health professionals and nine members of staff from the PCT.

Participants in the CHD module reported significantly more risk-reducing behaviours. Participants in a disease-specific Expert Patient Programme (EPP) for people with asthma rated the course positively, were subsequently more confident about discussing asthma with their doctor and had fewer concerns about their asthma medicines. Most users of the ‘Pharmacy First’ minor ailments scheme reported positive feedback and an intent to use the service again in the future. There were no significant differences in numbers of GP consultations for minor ailments between intervention and control groups. Health professionals were generally positive about encouraging self-care. Many felt they were already doing this but had insufficient time to implement it. A Local Enhanced Service (LES) was successful in engaging local general practices with self-care. Some organizational development relating to self-care occurred within the PCT but integration across different directorates was not achieved.

The JUSC programme was associated with changes in self-reported CHD risk reduction behaviours, in confidence to manage asthma and fewer concerns about medication, and with more positive attitudes towards consulting a pharmacist for minor ailments. Key principles for future PCT self-care strategies were identified. Further work is needed to embed support for self-care across the PCT as an organization.

This paper reports on a recent review of the prevalence of glaucoma, and identifies factors that impact on its variable reporting.

Glaucoma is a recognized chronic degenerative health problem worldwide, in which approximately two-thirds of sufferers are undiagnosed. Therefore it is important to better quantify glaucoma prevalence to plan adequate resources for effective risk screening, diagnosis, management and prevention. Accurate prevalence data also assist in determining the nature of relationships between glaucoma and putative risks.

A comprehensive search of peer-reviewed databases was conducted to identify and critically appraise secondary evidence published between 2002 and 2007. Glaucoma definitions, prevalence, incidence and risk factor data were extracted and compared in the context of their population descriptors.

There was no standard definition of glaucoma or standard population descriptors (age, ethnicity, country) utilized by either the primary studies included in the secondary evidence or as inclusion criteria in the secondary evidence. Prevalence for glaucoma of between 1–4% was commonly reported. Despite this, the influence of age and ethnicity on glaucoma prevalence within specific populations was repeatedly highlighted. There was consistency across studies of the decreased risk of white (European) populations compared with other ethnic groups. There was an exponential increase in prevalence of glaucoma over decades of increasing age. There were limited Australian data; however, prevalence of open-angle glaucoma is comparable with international figures. There is a clear need for worldwide agreement on standard epidemiological descriptors of glaucoma, using standard population frameworks, terminology and age groups.

To assess the ‘Okay to Stay’ plan to investigate if this reduces visits to emergency departments, unplanned admissions and elective admission to hospital in elderly patients with long-term health conditions.

The incidence of long-term conditions is rising as the elderly population increases, resulting in more people from this group attending emergency departments and being admitted to hospital. Okay to Stay is a simple plan for people with long-term conditions to help them remain in their own home if they suffer an acute exacerbation in their health. It was co-designed with professional and patient representatives with the aim of empowering patients and their carers to more effectively manage their long-term conditions.

Data from 50 patients (20 males, 30 females, mean baseline age 77.5 years) were compared 12 months before implementation of the plan and in the subsequent 12 months, with the significance of effects assessed at the 5 per cent significance level using t-tests.

Visits to emergency departments were reduced by 1.86; unplanned emergency admissions were reduced by 1.28 and planned elective admissions were raised by 0.22 admissions per annum. The reduction in visits to the emergency department was significant (p = 0.009) and the reduction in emergency admissions was significant (p = 0.015). The change in elective admissions was not significant (p = 0.855). The Okay to Stay plan is effective in reducing visits to the emergency department and unplanned hospital admissions in people with long-term conditions. This is a positive step to supporting vulnerable and complex patients who are cared for at home, and facilitates the recognition by the individual of the possibility to stay at home with the support of health professionals. There are potential cost benefits to the investment of initiating an Okay to Stay plan through the avoidance of visits to the emergency department and non-elective admissions to hospital.

Patient safety is a key priority for healthcare systems. Patient safety huddles have been advocated as a way to improve safety. We explored the feasibility of huddles in general practice.

We invited all general practices in West Yorkshire to complete an online survey and interviewed practice staff.

Thirty-four out of 306 practices (11.1%) responded to our survey. Of these, 22 practices (64.7%) reported having breaks for staff to meet and eight (23.5%) reported no longer having breaks in their practices. Seven interviewees identified several barriers to safety huddles including time and current culture; individuals felt meetings or breaks would not be easily integrated into current primary care structure.

Despite their initial promise, there are major challenges to introducing patient safety huddles within the current context of UK general practice. General practice staff may need more convincing of potential benefits.

To describe experiences among patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) of the lasting usefulness one year after participating in a multidisciplinary pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) programme in a primary health care (PHC) setting.

COPD affects patients’ functioning in daily life. In a previous study, the patients participated in a programme for PR and were found to increase their functional capacity, quality of life and decrease exacerbations. The present study aims to provide a deeper understanding of the experience of participating in the programme.

The study has a descriptive, qualitative design and is part of a longitudinal study on a multidisciplinary programme for PR of patients with COPD.

Semi-structured interviews with 20 participants were performed and data analysed by qualitative content analysis.

The findings are presented in one theme that illustrates the participants’ experience of their current situation; I live life at my own pace, and three sub-themes illustrating this experience related to the participation in the programme; Awareness of limitations in my life; Regained control over my life; and No change in my life.

Irrespective of whether the patients had already found their own strategies for managing the disease or whether the programme changed their lives, they lived their lives at their own pace. However, their lives were shadowed by worry.

A multidisciplinary programme for PR in PHC could be an alternative for patients suffering from COPD, in order to facilitate for them in their daily life. It is suggested that the inclusion of patients in such groups should be based on each individual's need based on symptoms or functional capacity in everyday life, not based on spirometry values.

Prevalent environmental risk factors place infants in lower-middle-income countries (LMICs) at an increased risk for feeding and developmental difficulties.

This study aimed to determine the relationship between feeding and developmental outcomes in infants, as early feeding difficulties may have a cascading effect on developmental outcomes and vice versa.

Data on 144 infants’ feeding and development [mean age (standard deviation) = 8.8 months (2.2)] from a primary health care clinic in Gauteng, South Africa were retrospectively analysed.

Early introduction of cup feeding was found to be a predictor of possible expressive language and articulation difficulties. Gagging, spitting, or vomiting, pocketing, the use of force feeding, and poor sucking and chewing abilities were significantly associated with behavioural and social–emotional difficulties. Breastfeeding was found to be a protective factor for language development. The results emphasise the importance of primary prevention and early identification of risks in late infancy in LMIC.

The aim of this pilot study is to evaluate a Japanese version of brief Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia (CBT-I) and contribute to primary care which leads to prevention of a lifestyle-related disease or a psychiatric disorder.

A single-arm study in nine patients with chronic insomnia who were under the pharmacotherapy was executed. The Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), the Athens Insomnia Scale (AIS), and the European Quality of Life 5 Items (EQ-5D) were assessed at the beginning of intervention, at the end of intervention, and after 12 weeks.

There were no patient dropouts nor adverse events. The average change in ISI score was −7.33 (95% CI: −10.31 to −4.36) at post-treatment and −6.11 (95% CI: −8.20 to −4.03) at the 12-week follow-up point (Cohen’s d = 2.25). The AIS score improved as well, and the EQ-5D score improved after 12 weeks. The safety and efficacy of the brief CBT-I were suggested.

Preferences and wishes of patients is an important indicator of primary health care provision, although there are differences between national primary care systems.

The aim of this paper is to describe and evaluate the preferences and values of Hungarian primary care (PC) patients before accessing and to analyse their experiences after attending PC services.

In the Hungarian arm of the European QUALICOPC Study, in 2013–2014, information was collected with questionnaires; the Patient Values contained 19 and the Patient Experiences had 41 multiple-choice questions.

The questionnaires were filled by 2149 (840 men, 1309 women) using PC services, aged 49.1 (SD ± 16.7) years, 73% of them having chronic morbidities. Women preferred to be accompanied and rated their own health better. Patients in the lowest educational category and women visited their GPs more often, and they are consulted more frequently by other doctors as well. Men, older and secondary educated people reported more frequently chronic morbidities. Longer opening hours were preferred by patients with higher education. The most preferred expectations were availability and polite communication of doctors, not pressures on consultation time, clear instructions provided during consultations, shared decisions about treatments and options for consultations, the knowledge of the doctors concerning the living conditions, social and cultural backgrounds of patients, updated medical records, short waiting times, options for home visits, wide scope of professional competences and trust in the doctor.

Wishes, preferences of patients and fulfilment were similar than described in other participating countries of the study. Although there are room to improve PC services, most of the questioned population were satisfied with the provision.

The aim of this paper is to introduce the experience of applying public–private partnership (PPP) in providing primary health care (PHC) in East Azerbaijan Province (EAP), Iran.

Moving toward the Universal Health Coverage (UHC) involves using of all health-related resources. Certainly, one of the key strategies for achieving UHC is PPP. Since 2015, a PPP in PHC policy has begun in EAP as a major strategy for strengthening the health system and achieving UHC.

In this case study, data were collected through interviews with stakeholders, document analysis, reviewing of health indexes and published studies. The data were analyzed using content analysis.

PPP in PHC policy was designed and implemented in EAP with the aim of social justice, strengthening the health system and achieving UHC in the framework of health complexes (HCs). HCs provide a defined service package according to the contract. The reimbursement method is a combination of per capita, fee for services and bonus methods. Part of the payments is fixed and the other part is based on the pay for quality system and paid according to the results of monitoring and evaluation. According to the study results, the most important strength of the plan is to improve access to services, especially in marginalized areas. The main weakness is not providing infrastructures before the implementation of the plan, and the most important challenges are financial, political and organizational unsustainability and, sometimes, poor cooperation by the other organizations. The findings show that PPP in PHC in EAP is an effective strategy to provide social justice, implement family practice and achieve UHC.

The aim of this study was to describe Child Health Service (CHS) nurses’ experiences with conducting individual parental conversations (IPCs) with non-birthing parents.

CHS nurses in Sweden mainly focus on monitoring a child’s physical and mental development and the mothers’ health in order to support their parenthood. The assignment of the CHS includes identifying dysfunctional social relationships in a family and strengthening responsive parenting. An imbalance arises within the family when someone in the family suffers from illness, which could have a negative effect on the whole family’s health and well-being.

An inductive, descriptive qualitative study design was used to describe and to gain an understanding of the CHS nurses’ experiences. Data were collected in 13 interviews, and a qualitative content analysis was performed.

The analysis of interviews with CHS nurses resulted in two main categories, each with three subcategories. The main categories are: working for equality and applying a family focus, and dealing with challenges in the developing assignment. The IPCs stimulate the CHS nurses to work for more equality and to apply a family focus, which can be a way of strengthening the families’ health and the children’s upbringing. Developing the CHS nurses’ assignment can be a challenge that appears to entail positive outcomes for CHS nurses, while also generating the need for CHS nurses to receive supervision to find ways to improve their approach and practice.

The aim of the study was to determine in adults the risk perception for cardiovascular disease (CVD) and the associated factors.

CVDs are the leading cause of death globally. In adults, perceptions related to the risk for CVDs have a considerable effect on decision-making processes related to one’s own health.

A cross-sectional study was conducted with 453 adult people from April to June 2019 in İzmir, Turkey. Data were collected with a sociodemographic characteristics questionnaire, perception of risk of heart disease scale (PRHDS), and health perception.

The mean PRHDS score of adults was 48.88 ± 8.12. The risk perception for CVD was influenced by variables that were age, gender, education, marital status, employment status, health perception, familial cardiovascular disease history, chronic disease status, smoking status, and body mass index. Although CVDs are the most prominent cause of disease-related death in the world, risk perception for CVD was found to be low among the individuals included in this study. This finding indicates the importance of informing individuals about CVD risk factors, raising awareness, and training.

The aim of the study was to evaluate the impact of hygiene routines and characteristics of the daycare centre (DCC) on sickness absence in preschool children.

In Sweden most children attend daycare outside home during daytime. Daycare outside home results in cognitive and social gains for the children, but it also increases the risk of infectious symptoms. About 17%–30% of the respiratory tract infections in preschool children are due to the daycare stay. Factors of importance for sickness absence in DCC have been studied earlier but no study has had a broader focus on routines and daycare characteristics at the same.

In 2003–2004 a national sample of 138 DCCs were visited by a study nurses who assisted in filling in a questionnaire on hygiene routines and daycare characteristics. Thereafter the DCC reported sickness absence on group level during two weeks in the autumn and two weeks in the spring.

Sickness absence was about 10% both in the autumn and in the spring. Only about 10% of the DCC had written rules about hand washing in children but almost all had unwritten rules. More than 50 children at the DCC and no regular contact with the child health centres were found to be of significant importance for sickness absence using a multiple logistic regression model.

The aim of this study is to explore the perceptions among primary health center staff concerning competencies, values, skills and resources related to team-based diabetes management and to describe the availability of needed resources for team-based approaches.

The diabetes epidemic challenges services available at primary health care centers in the Middle East. Therefore, there is a demand for evaluation of the available resources and team-based diabetes management in relation to the National Diabetes Management Guidelines.

A cross-sectional study was conducted with 26 public primary health care centers in Muscat, the capital of Oman. Data were collected from manual and electronic resources as well as a questionnaire that was distributed to the physician-in-charge and diabetes management team members.

The study revealed significant differences between professional groups regarding how they perceived their own competencies, values and skills as well as available resources related to team-based diabetes management. The perceived competencies were high among all professions. The perceived team-related values and skills were also generally high but with overall lower recordings among the nurses. This pattern, along with the fact that very few nurses have specialized qualifications, is a barrier to providing team-based diabetes management. Participants indicated that there were sufficient laboratory resources; however, reported that pharmacological, technical and human resources were lacking. Further work should be done at public primary diabetes management clinics in order to fully implement team-based diabetes management.