Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T15:32:35.791Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dr. Greg and The “Goodal” Notation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 December 2020

Samuel A. Tannenbaum  and
W. W. Greg
Samuel A. Tannenbaum
Affiliation:
New York City
W. W. Greg
Affiliation:
London, England
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Comment and Criticism
Information
PMLA , Volume 44 , Issue 3 , September 1929 , pp. 934 - 938
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 1929

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Note 1 in page 936 It is a pleasure to record here that “largely on the scientific investigation of inks and documents,” Oxford University has just awarded Mr. Mitchell the degree of D. Sc.

Note 2 in page 936 The reader will please to bear in mind that my case against the ‘Goodal’ notation was based solely on the handwriting. It was Dr. Greg who raised the issue of the ink.