Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Berent, Iris
2009.
Unveiling phonological universals: A linguist who asks “why” is (inter alia) an experimental psychologist.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 32,
Issue. 5,
p.
450.
윤관희
2010.
Do Korean Speakers Perceptually Restore Assimilated Words in English?.
Korean Journal of Linguistics,
Vol. 35,
Issue. 3,
p.
767.
2011.
The Handbook of Phonological Theory.
p.
779.
Shaw, Jason A.
and
Davidson, Lisa
2011.
Perceptual similarity in input–output mappings: A computational/experimental study of non-native speech production.
Lingua,
Vol. 121,
Issue. 8,
p.
1344.
KAPLAN, ABBY
2011.
How much homophony is normal?.
Journal of Linguistics,
Vol. 47,
Issue. 3,
p.
631.
Lee ShinSook
2011.
The Perceptual Interaction between Schwa Deletion and English Phonotactic Constraints.
Korean Journal of Linguistics,
Vol. 36,
Issue. 3,
p.
699.
Toro, Juan M.
Pons, Ferran
Bion, Ricardo A.H.
and
Sebastián-Gallés, Núria
2011.
The contribution of language-specific knowledge in the selection of statistically-coherent word candidates.
Journal of Memory and Language,
Vol. 64,
Issue. 2,
p.
171.
Dupoux, Emmanuel
Parlato, Erika
Frota, Sonia
Hirose, Yuki
and
Peperkamp, Sharon
2011.
Where do illusory vowels come from?.
Journal of Memory and Language,
Vol. 64,
Issue. 3,
p.
199.
Berent, Iris
Harder, Katherine
and
Lennertz, Tracy
2011.
Phonological Universals in Early Childhood: Evidence from Sonority Restrictions.
Language Acquisition,
Vol. 18,
Issue. 4,
p.
281.
Berent, Iris
Lennertz, Tracy
and
Balaban, Evan
2012.
Language Universals and Misidentification: A Two-way Street.
Language and Speech,
Vol. 55,
Issue. 3,
p.
311.
Lee ShinSook
2012.
Perception of English Word-initial Onsets Resulting from Schwa Deletion by English and Korean Speakers.
English Language and Linguistics,
Vol. 18,
Issue. 3,
p.
143.
Moreton, Elliott
and
Pater, Joe
2012.
Structure and Substance in Artificial‐Phonology Learning, Part II: Substance.
Language and Linguistics Compass,
Vol. 6,
Issue. 11,
p.
702.
Davidson, Lisa
and
Shaw, Jason A.
2012.
Sources of illusion in consonant cluster perception.
Journal of Phonetics,
Vol. 40,
Issue. 2,
p.
234.
Berent, Iris
Vaknin-Nusbaum, Vered
Balaban, Evan
and
Galaburda, Albert M.
2013.
Phonological generalizations in dyslexia: The phonological grammar may not be impaired.
Cognitive Neuropsychology,
Vol. 30,
Issue. 5,
p.
285.
Hayes, Bruce
and
White, James
2013.
Phonological Naturalness and Phonotactic Learning.
Linguistic Inquiry,
Vol. 44,
Issue. 1,
p.
45.
Maïonchi-Pino, Norbert
Taki, Yasuyuki
Yokoyama, Satoru
Magnan, Annie
Takahashi, Kei
Hashizume, Hiroshi
Écalle, Jean
and
Kawashima, Ryuta
2013.
Is the phonological deficit in developmental dyslexia related to impaired phonological representations and to universal phonological grammar?.
Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,
Vol. 115,
Issue. 1,
p.
53.
Berent, Iris
2013.
The phonological mind.
Trends in Cognitive Sciences,
Vol. 17,
Issue. 7,
p.
319.
Seung-Hoon Shin
2013.
Interrelationship between Mother Tongue, Universal Linguistic Knowledges and Linguistic Experience in Speech Perception: Focusing on English Segments and Syllable Contact Violations.
Korean Journal of Linguistics,
Vol. 38,
Issue. 1,
p.
141.
de Lacy, Paul
and
Kingston, John
2013.
Synchronic explanation.
Natural Language & Linguistic Theory,
Vol. 31,
Issue. 2,
p.
287.
Breen, Mara
Kingston, John
and
Sanders, Lisa D.
2013.
Perceptual representations of phonotactically illegal syllables.
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics,
Vol. 75,
Issue. 1,
p.
101.