FirstView articles

The Antidemocratic Harms of Mansplaining
Laura Montanaro
Published online by Cambridge University Press:

21 October 2024, pp. 1-13
- Article
- - You have access
  - Open access
- PDF
- HTML
- Export citation
The neologism “mansplaining” captures an insidious dynamic in which men explain things to women that women already understand, assuming that, by virtue of being a woman, she lacks the man’s knowledge. Mansplaining has started to receive some attention in contemporary scholarship, conceptualizing the phenomenon and identifying its epistemic harm. My purpose is to consider mansplaining and its harms from the perspective of democratic theory. Setting the problem of mansplaining against the norms we expect of democracy—equality, inclusion, and recognition—I argue that mansplaining poses harms that are not only individual and epistemic but also collective and relational. I distinguish two types of mansplaining based on women’s expertise and experience to elaborate on its collective epistemic harms to decision making and its relational harm of political exclusion. Mansplaining poses further relational harms of inequality and misrecognition, undermining the equal social relations and social trust required for deliberation.

Refugee Protection as a Public Good: What Benefits Do States Derive?
Philipp Lutz, Diego Caballero-Vélez
Published online by Cambridge University Press:

15 October 2024, pp. 1-16
- Article
- - You have access
  - Open access
- PDF
- HTML
- Export citation
While a growing number of refugees is in need of humanitarian protection, most states are reluctant to admit them. For more than two decades, scholars have thought to understand this intricate challenge of international governance through the prism of collective action theory and the concept of refugee protection as an international public good. However, the specific benefits that states gain from refugee protection and that are assumed to constitute the public good remain surprisingly vague and under-specified. In this Reflection, we make three contributions to address this issue. First, we take stock of the literature and assess the evolution of the collective action theory in asylum governance. Second, we identify and conceptualize legitimacy, security, reputation, and development as four types of benefits that states derive from refugee protection. Third, we discuss the limitations of the dominant rational-choice approach and contend that the nature of refugee protection in the international realm is the product of international and domestic politics based on the contestation of interests and norms. These insights result in a series of recommendations for future research of refugee protection as a collective action problem.

Advocacy and Change in International Organizations: Communication, Protection, and Reconstruction in UN Peacekeeping. By Kseniya Oksamytna. New York: Oxford University Press, 2023. 288p. $110.00 cloth.
Richard Caplan
Published online by Cambridge University Press:

07 October 2024, pp. 1-2
- Article
- - You have access
- PDF
- HTML
- Export citation

China’s Governance in the “New Era” of Xi Jinping
Elizabeth J. Perry
Published online by Cambridge University Press:

07 October 2024, pp. 1-7
- Article
- - You have access
- PDF
- HTML
- Export citation
The dramatic shifts in policies and practices of the People’s Republic of China (PRC) over the course of its tumultuous 75-year history underscore the decisive importance of political leadership. Institutionally, China closely resembles other former and surviving Communist regimes. Operationally, however, its dynamic patterns of governance reflect the shifting concerns of a succession of visionary Communist Party leaders.