Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T17:28:22.920Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

“Please Mind the Gap”: Policy Relevance and British IR

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 June 2015

Helen Louise Turton
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reflections Symposium
Information
Perspectives on Politics , Volume 13 , Issue 2 , June 2015 , pp. 399 - 401
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andersson, Lisa. 2003. Research for Whom? Reconceptualizing the Relationship Between Social Science and Public Policy. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, C. 2011. “The Development of International Relations Theory in the UK: Traditions, Contemporary Perspectives, and Trajectories” International Relations of the Asia Pacific 11: 309–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, Wayne S., and Nossal, Kim Richard. 2009. “The ‘Crimson World’: The Anglo Core, the Post-Imperial Non-Core, and the Hegemony of American IR.” In IR Scholarship around the World: Worlding beyond the West, ed. Tickner, Arlene and Waever, Ole. Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Erikkson, Johan. 1999. ‘‘Observers or Advocates? On the Political Role of Security Analysts.’’ Cooperation and Conflict 34: 311–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erikkson, Johan, and Sundelius, Bengt. 2005. “Molding Minds That Form Policy: How to Make Research Useful.” International Studies Perspectives 6: 51–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, Christopher, and Beshoff, Pamela, eds 1994. Two Worlds of International Relations: Academics, Practitioners and the Trade in Ideas. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jentleson, Bruce, and Ratner, Ely. 2011. “Bridging the Beltway-Ivory Tower Gap.” International Studies Review, 13: 6–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jørgensen, , Erik, Knud, and Knudsen, Tonny Brems. 2006. “United Kingdom.” In International Relations in Europe: Traditions, Perspectives and Destinations, ed. Erik Jørgensen, Knud and Knudsen, Tonny Brems. Oxon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawson, George. 2008. “For a Public International Relations.” International Political Sociology 2: 17–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mearsheimer, John. 2004. “A Self-Enclosed World?” In Problems and Methods in the Study of Politics, ed. Shapiro, Ian, Smith, Rogers M., and Masoud, Tarek E.. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mearsheimer, John, and Walt, Stephen. 2013. “Leaving Theory Behind: Why Simplistic Hypothesis Testing Is Bad for International Relations.” European Journal of International Relations 19: 427–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nye, Joseph, 2008. “Bridging the Gap between Theory and Policy.” Political Psychology 29: 593–603.Google Scholar
Paasi, Anssi. 2005. “Globalisation, Academic Capitalism, and the Uneven Geographies of International Journal Publishing Spaces.” Environment and Planning A 37: 769–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, Ian. 2005. The Flight from Reality in the Human Sciences. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Steve. 2000. “The Discipline of International Relations: Still an American Social Science?” British Journal of Politics and International Relations 2: 374–402.Google Scholar
Smith, Steve. 2007. “Introduction: Diversity and Disciplinarity in International Relations.” In International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity, ed. Dunne, Tim, Kurki, Milja and Smith, Steve. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Turton, Helen. 2015. International Relations and American Dominance: A Diverse Discipline. Oxon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walt, Stephen M. 2005. “The Relationship between Theory and Policy in International Relations.” Annual Review of Political Science 8: 23–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walt, Stephen M. 2011. “International Relations and the Public Sphere.” Social Science Research Council, Essay Series, Academia and the Public Sphere, 1–11. http://publicsphere.ssrc.org/walt-international-affairs-and-the-public-sphere/ CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wight, Colin. 2001. “The Continuity of Change, or a Change in Continuity?” International Studies Review 3: 81–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Ernest J. 2007. “Is There Really a Scholar-Practitioner Gap? An Institutional Analysis.” PS: Political Science and Politics 40: 147–51.Google Scholar