Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-c9gpj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-15T21:34:05.594Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Transient Photoconductivity in Polyacetylene and Polydiacetylene

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

D. Moses ,
S. Phillips ,
M. Sinclair  and
A. J. Heeger
D. Moses
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Institute for Polymers and Organic Solids, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106
S. Phillips
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Institute for Polymers and Organic Solids, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106
M. Sinclair
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Institute for Polymers and Organic Solids, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106
A. J. Heeger
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Institute for Polymers and Organic Solids, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106
Get access

Abstract

Conducting polymers have been found to be rather good photoconductors in the sub-nansecond time regime. The TP measurement is an effective probe for determining carrier photogeneration quantum yield as well as for investigating transport mechanisms. Here, we present a short survey of our results for a few interesting polymeric systems. We start with the trans-(CH)x grown by the Shirakawa method. We then compared the TP results to those obtained from PDA-TS which currently is the only conjugated polymer in single crystal form. From this comparison, we are able to gauge the improvements in the material quality as was demonstrated by recent TP in trans-(CH)x grown by the Naarmann method

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 109: Symposium K – Nonlinear Optical Properties of Polymers , 1987 , 195
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Auston, D. H., in Picosecond Optoelectronic Devices, Ed. by Lee, Chi H. (Academic Press, NY, 1984) Chap. 4.Google Scholar
2. For more experimental details see, Sinclair, M., Moses, D. and Heeger, A. J., Solid Sate Commun. 59, 343 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Vardeny, Z., Strait, J., Moses, D., Chung, T.-C.. and Heeger, A. J., Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 1657 (1982).Google Scholar
4. Etemad, S., Mitani, T., Ozaki, M., Chung, T.-C., Heeger, A. J. and MacDiarmid, A. G., Solid State Commun. 40, 75 (1981).Google Scholar
5. Conwell, E. M., IEEE Trans. Elec. Insul. EI-22, #5, 591 (1987).Google Scholar
6. Greene, B. I., Orenstein, J., Millard, R. R., Williams, L. R., Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 2250 (1987); preprint.Google Scholar
7. Su, W.-P., Schrieffer, J. R. and Heeger, A. J., Phys. Rev. Lett. 42, 1698 (1979); Phys. Rev. B, 22, 2099 (1980).Google Scholar
8. Mele, E. J., Solid State Commun. 44, 827 (1982); Syn. Mtls. 9, 207 (1984).Google Scholar
9. Moses, D., Sinclair, M. and Heeger, A. J., Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 2710 (1987).Google Scholar
10. Donovan, K. J., Freeman, P. D. and Wilson, E. G., Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. 118, 395 (1985); K. J. Donovan and E. G. Wilson, Phi. Mag. B, 44, 9 (1981).Google Scholar
11. Haberkorn, R. and Michael-Beyerle, M. E., Chem. Phys. Lett. 23, 128 (1973).Google Scholar
12. Sebastian, L. and Weiser, G., Chem. Phys. 62, 447 (1981).Google Scholar
13. Naarmann, H., Syn. Mtls. 17, 223 (1987).Google Scholar
14. Phillips, S. and Heeger, A. J., in preparation.Google Scholar