Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4rdrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-07T12:44:37.197Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Temperature dependence of HOMO-LUMO levels and open circuit voltage for P3HT:PCBM organic solar cells

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2012

Yang Shen ,
Louis Scudiero  and
Mool C. Gupta
Yang Shen
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Virginia, 351 McCormick Road, Charlottesville Virginia 22904, USA
Louis Scudiero*
Affiliation:
Chemistry Department, Washington State University, Fulmer 261A, Pullman, Washington 99164, USA
Mool C. Gupta*
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Virginia, 351 McCormick Road, Charlottesville Virginia 22904, USA
*
*Corresponding authors: [email protected] (Mool C. Gupta), [email protected] (Louis Scudiero)
*Corresponding authors: [email protected] (Mool C. Gupta), [email protected] (Louis Scudiero)
Get access

Abstract

In this study, the open circuit voltage (VOC) of poly (3-hexylthiophene-2,5-diyl) (P3HT) and [6,6]-phenyl C61-butyric acid methyl ester (PCBM) bulk heterojunction (BHJ) organic solar cells was measured at temperatures ranging from 300 K to 400 K. The temperature dependence of the vacuum shift and of the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) energy level of P3HT and PCBM were measured by ultraviolet photoelectron spectroscopy (UPS) in the same temperature range. The temperature dependence of the absorption edge was also studied in the same temperature range to obtain the temperature variation of the optical band gap energy (Eg). The measured VOC of the devices showed a clear decreasing trend with increasing operating temperature and the total decrease was found to be about 0.1 V. Although the origin of VOC is still not fully understood it is generally believed that the energy level offset between the HOMO of the donor and the LUMO of the acceptor minus the exciton binding energy (0.3 eV) directly determines the value of VOC. However, by utilizing the measured values of the HOMO for the P3HT (donor) and of the LUMO for the PCBM (acceptor), we have found that the calculated values of VOC and its temperature dependence do not agree with the measured VOC values. This indicates that factors other than the offset between the HOMO of the donor and the LUMO of the acceptor materials are impacting VOC.

Keywords

photovoltaicorganicthin film
Type
Articles
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 1360: Symposium OO – Synthesis and Processing of Organic and Polymeric Materials for Semiconductor Applications , 2011 , mrss11-1360-oo08-06
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Hoppe, H., Sariciftci, N.S., J. Mater. Res. 19 (2004) 1924–1945.10.1557/JMR.2004.0252Google Scholar
2. Kietzke, T., Adv. Optoelectron. (2007) 40285-1-40285-15.Google Scholar
3. Deibel, C., Dyakonov, V., Rep. Prog. Phys. 73 (2010) 096401–1-096401-39.Google Scholar
4. http://www.konarka.com/index.php/company/our-history/ Google Scholar
5. Scharber, M.C., Mühlbacher, D., Koppe, M., Denk, P., Waldauf, C., Heeger, A. J. and Brabec, C. J., Adv. Mater. 18 (2006) 789–794.Google Scholar
6. Rand, B.P., Burk, D.P., and Forrest, S.R., Phys. Rev. B 75 (2007) 115327-1-115327-11.Google Scholar
7. Brumbach, M., Placencia, D., and Armstrong, N.R., J. Phys. Chem. C 112 (2008) 3142–3151.Google Scholar
8. Bagienski, W., Gupta, M.C., Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells (2011), doi:10.1016, j.solmat.2010.11.026 (in press).Google Scholar
9. Kumar, P., Jain, S.C., Kumar, H., Chand, S., and Kumar, V., Appl. Phys. Lett. 94 (2009) 183505–1-183505-3.Google Scholar
10. Rand, B.P., Burk, D.P., and Forrest, S.R., Phys. Rev. B 75 (2007) 115327-1-115327-11.Google Scholar
11. Ma, W., Yang, C., Gong, X., Lee, K., Heeger, A.J., Adv. Funct. Mater. 15, (2005) 1617–1622.Google Scholar
12. Kim, Y., Cook, S., Tuladhar, S.M., Choulis, S.A., Nelson, J., Durant, J.R., Bradley, D.D.C., Giles, M., McCulloch, I., Ha, C.S., Ree, M., Nature Mater. 5 (2006) 197–203.Google Scholar
13. Shen, Y., Scudiero, L., Gupta, M.C., (Manuscript under preparation for submission to Solar Energy Materials & Solar Cells).Google Scholar
14. Koppolu, V.R., Gupta, M.C., Scudiero, L., Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, 95, 1111–1118.Google Scholar
15. Kim, J.Y., Kim, S.H., Lee, H.H., Lee, K., Ma, W., Gong, X., Heeger, A.J., Adv. Mater. 18, 5 (2006) 572–576.Google Scholar
16. Yamanari, T., Taima, T., Sakia, J., and Saito, K., Solar Energy Materials & Solar Cells 93 (2009) 759–761.Google Scholar