Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-tn8tq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-05T05:42:40.650Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Staging Transitions In Li-Graphite : Phonon Spectra Of Dilute Stage 1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

K.C. Woo
Affiliation:
Moore School EE and LRSM, University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia, PA, USA
H. Mertwoy
Affiliation:
Moore School EE and LRSM, University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia, PA, USA
J.E. Fischer
Affiliation:
Moore School EE and LRSM, University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia, PA, USA
W.A. Kamitakahara
Affiliation:
Ames Lab and Physics Dept., Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA
D.S. Robinson
Affiliation:
Physics Dept. and Materials Research Lab, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, USA
Get access

Abstract

First-order transitions to dilute stage one from stages 2,3 and 4 and from mixed stage 1+2 are observed in Li-graphite as predicted by Safran. The upper phase boundary is asymmetric in concentration and is sharply peaked about x ∼ 0.4. The phonons in the dilute stage 1 have energies between those of LiC6 and graphite. Unlike the stage 2 compounds, the compressibility does not scale in a simple way with intercalant density.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Safran, S.A., Phys. Rev. Lett. 44, 937 (1980).Google Scholar
2. Dahn, J.R., Dahn, D.C. and Haering, R.R., Solid State Commun. 42, 179 (1982).Google Scholar
3. Millman, S.E. and Kirczenow, G., Phys. Rev. B 26, 2810 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. We also studied several other donor and acceptor intercalated graphite compounds ranging from stage two to stage seven in x-ray diffraction and failed to observe staging transitions at temperatures below which the compound decomposes or deintercalates.Google Scholar
5. Woo, K.C., Kamitakahara, W.A., DiVincenzo, D.P., Robinson, D.S., Mertwoy, H., Milliken, J.W. and Fischer, J.E., unpublished.Google Scholar
6. Zabel, H. and Magerl, A., Phys. Rev. B 25, 2463 (1982).Google Scholar
7. DiVincenzo, D.P. and Mele, E.J., Phys. Rev. B 25, 7822 (1982).Google Scholar
8. Robinson, D.S. and Salamon, M.B., Phys. Rev. Lett. 48, 156 (1982).Google Scholar
9. Daumas, N. and Hérold, A., C.R. Acad. Sci. Ser. C, 286, 373 (1965).Google Scholar
10. Rossat-Mignod, J., Fruchart, D., Moran, M.J., Milliken, J.W. and Fischer, J.E., Synthetic Metals 2, 143 (1980).Google Scholar
11. Nicklow, R., Wakabayashi, N. and Smith, H.G., Phys. Rev. B 5, 4951 (1972).Google Scholar