Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-lvtdw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-01T22:52:59.305Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Role of Stochastic Noise on the Glass Transition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

Fernando C. Perez-Cardenas
Affiliation:
Vitreous State Laboratory, The Catholic University of America, Washington, D.C. 20064
Hao Gan
Affiliation:
Vitreous State Laboratory, The Catholic University of America, Washington, D.C. 20064
Get access

Abstract

Glasses are amorphous solids that exhibit an intricate structural relaxation. A broad relaxation time spectrum always emerges when these systems are perturbed. By using a Langevin-type differential equation to describe the structure dynamicsof these materials, it is depicted how the broad relaxation time spectrum arises due to the stochastic noise and how this affects the system's structure evolution as it is cooled down into the glass transition region. This stochastic model provides a macroscopic as well a microscopic view of the glass relaxation process.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Tool, A Q.. J Res. Nat. Bur. Stand. 34. 199(1945).Google Scholar
2. Ma., S., Modern Theory of Critical Phenomena, W. A. Benjamin. London (1976).Google Scholar
3. de Groot., S. R. and Mazur., P., Non-Equilibrium Thermodynamics Dover Publications, New York (1984).Google Scholar
4. Gupta, P. K.. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 102, 250(1988).Google Scholar
5. Van Kampen, N. G., Stochastic Processes in Physics and Chemistry, North-Holland, Amsterdam (1992).Google Scholar
6. Landau, L. D. and Lifshitz., E. M.. Statistical Physics Third Edition, Pergamon Press, Oxford (1980).Google Scholar
7. Perez-Cardenas., F. C, Ph. D Dissertarion. The Catholic University of America (to be published).Google Scholar
8. Palmer., R. G, Stein, D. L., Abrahams., E. and Anderson, P. W., Phys. Rev. Left. 53, 958(1984).Google Scholar
9. Adam., G. and Gibbs., J. H., J. Chem. Phys. 43, 139(1965).Google Scholar
10. DeBolt., M. A.. Ph. D. Dissertation, The Catholic University of Amenca (1976).Google Scholar