Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-txr5j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-21T09:16:31.720Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Optical Interference Filters Made of Porous Silicon

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

M. Thönissen
Affiliation:
Institut für Schicht- und lonentechnik (ISI), Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, D-52425 Jülich, Germany
M. G. Berger
Affiliation:
Institut für Schicht- und lonentechnik (ISI), Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, D-52425 Jülich, Germany
M. Krüger
Affiliation:
Institut für Schicht- und lonentechnik (ISI), Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, D-52425 Jülich, Germany
S. Billat
Affiliation:
Institut für Schicht- und lonentechnik (ISI), Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, D-52425 Jülich, Germany
R. Arens-Fischer
Affiliation:
Institut für Schicht- und lonentechnik (ISI), Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, D-52425 Jülich, Germany
O. Glück
Affiliation:
Institut für Schicht- und lonentechnik (ISI), Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, D-52425 Jülich, Germany
H. Lüth
Affiliation:
Institut für Schicht- und lonentechnik (ISI), Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, D-52425 Jülich, Germany
S. Hilbrich
Affiliation:
I. Physikalisches Institut, RWTH Aachen, D-52056 Aachen, Germany
W. Theiss
Affiliation:
I. Physikalisches Institut, RWTH Aachen, D-52056 Aachen, Germany
P. Grosse
Affiliation:
I. Physikalisches Institut, RWTH Aachen, D-52056 Aachen, Germany
Get access

Abstract

Porous silicon (PS) layers can easily be formed by an electrochemical etch process using a mixture of hydrofluoric acid (HF) and ethanol. The microstructure and porosity of the layers depend on the HF concentration, the doping level of the substrate and the current density applied during the etch process. Changing the current density during the etch process will result in a well defined layer structure consisting of layers with different porosities. Each single layer can be treated as an effective medium exhibiting a refractive index depending mainly on the porosity of the layer. Using reflectance measurements we have investigated the dependence of the refractive index of PS layers on the formation current density for different substrates. In addition the etch rate was determined by thickness measurements with an electron microscope. Based on these results various kinds of optical interference filters were studied. We have formed samples consisting of discrete single layers with different porosities (e.g. Bragg reflectors) as well as samples with continuous variation of the refractive index (rugate filters). Combining these PS filters with standard photolithography steps, microoptical devices such as spectral sensitive photodiodes can be realized.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Uhlir, A., Bell Syst. Tech 35, 333 (1956).Google Scholar
2. Canham, L., Appl. Phys. Lett. 57, 1046 (1990).Google Scholar
3. Lehmann, V. and Gdsele, U., Appl. Phys. Lett. 58, 856 (1991).Google Scholar
4. Berger, M. et al., J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 27, 1333 (1994).Google Scholar
5. Berger, M., Frohnhoff, S., Theiß, W., Rossow, U., and Miinder, H., Porous si: From single porous layers to porosity superlattices, in Porous Silicon Science and Technology, edited by Vial, J.-C. and Derrien, J., volume ISBN 3–540- 58936–8, page 345, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 1994, Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
6. Berger, M. et al., Thin Solid Films 255, 313 (1995).Google Scholar
7. Berger, M. et al., in Optical interference coatings, edited by Abeles, F., number 2253 in Proc. SPIE, page 865, 1994.Google Scholar
8. Theiß, W., The use of effective medium theories in optical spectroscopy, in Festkörperprobleme / Advances in Solid State Physics, edited by R. Helbig, volume 33, page 149, Braunschweig/ Wiesbaden, Vieweg.Google Scholar
9. Theil, W. et al., in Proceedings of the Materials Research Society Meeting, volume 358, page 435, 1995.Google Scholar
10. Smith, R. and Collins, S., J. Appl. Phys. 71, R1 (1992).Google Scholar
11. Billat, S. et al., to be publishedGoogle Scholar
12. Bovard, B., Appl. Opt. 32, 5427 (1993).Google Scholar
13. Bovard, B., Appl. Opt. 29, 24 (1990).Google Scholar