Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-w7rtg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-12T08:07:45.203Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Industrial Perspective on Reliability of VLSI Devices

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

P. B. Ghate
P. B. Ghate*
Affiliation:
Texas Instruments Incorporated, 8390 LBJ Freeway, P.O. Box 655303, MS 3685, Dallas, TX 75265
Get access

Abstract

The reliability of silicon integrated circuits (ICs) has improved significantly in the last decade. The complexity of ICs continues to increase. The semiconductor industry is actively working to a) improve the reliability of very large scale (VLSI) ICs, and b) reduce the failure rates to a value closer to 0.1 FIT by the year 2000. This paper summarizes the current status of quality and reliability of ICs. Some of the reliability limiting factors are described. Inadequacy of conventional accelerated test methods to verify the reliability of VLSI devices is highlighted. A challenging VLSI reliability goal with a failure rate approaching 0.1 FIT requires a) an understanding of the root causes of failure mechanisms, b) a translation of the lessons learned into a set of design rules for the circuit designers, c) appropriate materials and process specifications consistent with manufacturing capabilities, and d) in-process reliability test structures and test procedures. A VLSI failure rate goal of 0.1 FIT presents an exciting challenge for the materials scientists.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 225: Symposium G – Materials Reliability Issues in Microelectronics , 1991 , 207
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Semiconductor Research Corporation Newsletter, Vol.7, No. 11, 1989. Research Triangle Park, NC 27709Google Scholar
2. TQC World, a Texas Instruments Semiconductor Group Publication, Vol.2, No. 1, March 1990, p. 2. INQ#3903, TQC World, Texas Instruments, MS 8214, 8360 LBJ Freeway, Dallas, TX 75243.Google Scholar
3. Ghate, P.B., Denton, D.L., Yang, P., TECHCON-1988, presented and organized by Semiconductor Research Corporation.Google Scholar
4. Schafft, H.A., Baglee, D.A., Kennedy, P.E., Int. Rel. Phys. Symp. 1991, p. 1.Google Scholar
5. Thomas, R.W., The U.S. Department of Defense Procurement Strategy and the Semiconductor Industry in the 1990's”, Proc. 4th Int. Conf. Quality in Electronic Components, 1989, p. 1.Google Scholar
6. Bellay, L.M., Ghate, P.B., Wagner, L.C., Proc. Int. Symp. for Testing and Failure Analysis, 1990, p. 89.Google Scholar
7. Conrad, T.R., Mielnk, R.J., Musolino, L.S., Int. Rel. Phys. Symp. 1988, p. 126.Google Scholar
8. Vahle, R.W., Hanna, R.J., Proc. Int. Congress on Transportation Electronics, October 15–17, 1990, p. 225, published by Soc. of Automotive Engineers.Google Scholar
9. Denton, D.L., Semiconductor Internal, 1988, p. 145, JEDEC Task Force MemberGoogle Scholar
10. Ghate, P.B. in Frontiers in Electronic Materials and Processing, AIP Conf. Proc. No. 138; L.J. Brillson, Ed., AIP, New York (1986), p. 231; Physics Today, Vol.39, No. 10, (1986), p. 58.Google Scholar
11. Burch, R., Hall, J.E., Najm, F., Hocevar, D., Yang, P., McGraw, M., Texas Instruments Technical Journal, Vol.5, No. 3 (1988), p. 74.Google Scholar
12. Liew, B.K., Fang, D., Cheung, , Hu, C., Int. Rel. Phys. Symp. 1990 III; also see C. Hu, et al, publications by UCB/Electronics Research Lab, M90/2, 3, and 4, Electronics Research Lab of University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar