Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T09:22:25.212Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Diffusion Porosity and Diffusivity of Radionuclides in Granitic Rocks. Part II: Diffusivity and Electrical Resistivity Measurements in Rock Matrix Around Fractures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2011

Heikki Kumpulainen
Affiliation:
Technical Research Centre of Finland, Reactor Laboratory, P.O. Box 200, SF–02151 Espoo, Finland
A. Muurinen
Affiliation:
Technical Research Centre of Finland, Reactor Laboratory, P.O. Box 200, SF–02151 Espoo, Finland
K. Uusheimo
Affiliation:
Technical Research Centre of Finland, Reactor Laboratory, P.O. Box 200, SF–02151 Espoo, Finland
Get access

Abstract

The microfracturing of rock matrix around fractures was studied experimentally by determining the diffusion properties of a non-sorbing tracer. The diffusivities were measured by tracer techniques using 36C1 isotope as a tracer and 0.0044 M or 1 M NaCl solutions. The diffusivities were also determined by measuring the electrical resistivities of the samples saturated with 1 M NaCl solution. The rock samples were granite around a partially filled carbonate fracture and gneiss around a slickenside fracture.

The apparent diffusivities of all the studied samples were approximately of the same order of magnitude. None of the variables, i.e. salt concentration of the solution, rock and fracture type or distance from the fracture surface, had any significant effect on the apparent diffusivities.

The effective diffusivities and porosities, on the other hand, depended strongly on the salt concentration of tha water used to saturate the rock samples. Possible reasons for this could be the alteration of the pore structure or change of the electrical double layer during the saturation of the rock with strong NaCl solution.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Pirhonen, V., Pitkänen, P. and Front, K., Diffusion interfaces of fractures in granitic rocks, Helsinki 1990, Nuclear Waste Commission of Finnish Power Companies, Report YJT-90–10, 26 p.Google Scholar
2 Kumpulainen, H., Uusheimo, K., Diffusivity and electrical resistivity measurements in rock matrix around fracturest, Helsinki 1989, Nuclear Waste Commission of Finnish Power Companies, Report YJT-89–19, 40 p.Google Scholar
3 Uusheimo, K. and Muurinen, A., Effect of sodium chlorine concentration on diffusivity in rock matrix, Helsinki, 1990, Nuclear Waste Commission of Finnish Power Companies, Report YJT-90–11, 19 p.Google Scholar
4 Skagius, K., S-10044, PhD thesis, Stockholm, Royal Institute of Technology Department of Chemical Engineering, Sweden, 1986.Google Scholar
5 Katsube, T., Melnyk, T. and Hume, J., Pore structure from diffusion in granitic rocks, Technical Record TR-381, Pinawa, Manitoba, Canada 1986, Atomic Energy of Canada Limited, 27 p.Google Scholar
6 Skagius, K. and Neretnieks, I., Diffusion in crystalline rocks of some sorbing and nonsorbinq species, SKBF/KBS Technical Report 82–12, Stockholm, Sweden 1982, Svensk Kärnbränsleförsörjning Ab, 19 p.Google Scholar
7 Birgersson, L. and Neretnieks, I., Diffusion in the matrix of granitic rock. Field test in the stripa mine. Part 2, SKBF/KBS Technical Report 83–39, Stockholm, Sweden 1983, Svensk Kärnbränsleförsörjning Ab, 40 p.Google Scholar