Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-l4ctd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-12T21:12:16.588Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Determination of Criteria for Selecting A UO2 Fuel Dissolution Model for Nuclear Fuel Waste Management Concept Assessment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

S. Sunder ,
D.W. Shoesmith ,
N.H. Miller  and
G.J. Wallace
S. Sunder
Affiliation:
AECL Research, Whiteshell Laboratories, Pinava, Manitoba, Canada. ROE ILO
D.W. Shoesmith
Affiliation:
AECL Research, Whiteshell Laboratories, Pinava, Manitoba, Canada. ROE ILO
N.H. Miller
Affiliation:
AECL Research, Whiteshell Laboratories, Pinava, Manitoba, Canada. ROE ILO
G.J. Wallace
Affiliation:
AECL Research, Whiteshell Laboratories, Pinava, Manitoba, Canada. ROE ILO
Get access

Abstract

Assessing the concept of direct disposal of used nuclear fuel in a geological vault requires a model to predict the dissolution rate of UO2 in groundwater. A solubility-limited model can be used to calculate the dissolution rate of UO2 fuel under non-oxidizing conditions. When the oxidative dissolution of UO2 is an irreversible process, a kinetic model is more suitable to describe the dissolution of UO2 under oxidizing conditions. Experimental studies were carried out using electrochemical techniques and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, XPS, to determine criteria for selecting the appropriate model for estimating used-fuel dissolution rates as a function of the redox conditions in the vault at the time of container failure. UO2 electrodes were subjected to prolonged (>1000 min) potentiostatic oxidation, and the rate of oxidation and dissolution of UO2 fuel was investigated as a function of the applied potential. UO2 oxidation was also carried out by the products of water radiolysis and studied as a function of dose rate, total dose and solution chemistry.

These studies show that significant oxidative dissolution of UO2 appears possible for potentials more positive than -100 mV vs SCE in solutions with a pH close to that of the deep groundwaters, i.e., from 6 to 10. A kinetic model, which takes into account the mechanism of UO2 oxidation, is more appropriate to estimate dissolution rates of UO2 fuel for redox conditions more oxidizing than -100 mV vs SCE.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 257: Symposium – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XV , 1991 , 345
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Werme, L.O. and Forsyth, R.S., in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XI, Apted, M.J. and Westerman, R.E. (eds). Materials Research Soc. Symp. Proc. 112, 443–452 (1987).Google Scholar
2. Johnson, L.H. and Shoesmith, D.W., in Radioactive Waste Forms for the Future, Lutze, W. and Ewing, R.C. (eds). Elsevier Sci. Publ. B.V., 635–698 (1988).Google Scholar
3. Garisto, N.C. and Leneveu, D.M., in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XI, Apted, M.J. and Westerman, R.E. (eds.). Materials Research Soc. Symp. Proc. 112, 313–322 (1987).Google Scholar
4. Garisto, N.C. and Garisto, F., Nucl. Energy, 13, 591 (1986).Google Scholar
5. Garisto, N.C. and LeNeveu, D.M., The Vault Model For the Disposal of Used CANDU Fuel: Documentation and Analysis of Scoping Calculations, Atomic Energy of Canada Limited Report, AECL-9578 (1989).Google Scholar
6. Bruno, J., Casas, I. and Puigdomenech, I., Radiochimica Acta, 44/45, 11 (1988).Google Scholar
7. Gascoyne, M. and Kamineni, D.C.. Groundwater Chemistry and Fracture Mineralogy in the Whiteshell Research Area: Supporting Data for the Geosphere and Biosphere Transport Models. Atomic Energy of Canada Limited Technical Record, TR-516 (to be published).Google Scholar
8. Shoesmith, D.W., Sunder, S., Johnson, L.H. and Bailey, M.G., In Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management IX, Werme, L.O. (ed.). Materials Research Soc. Symp. Proc. Vol. 50, 309–316 (1985).Google Scholar
9. Christensen, H. and Bjergbakke, E., in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management X, Bates, J.K. and Seefeldt, W.B. (eds.). Materials Research Soc. Symp. Proc. Vol. 84, 115–122 (1987).Google Scholar
10. Sunder, S., Shoesmith, D.W., Christensen, H., Bailey, M.G. and Miller, N.H., in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XII, Lutze, W. and Ewing, R.C. (eds.). Materials Research Soc. Symp. Proc. Vol. 127, 317–324 (1989).Google Scholar
11. Sunder, S., Shoesmith, D.W., Christensen, H., Miller, N.H. and Bailey, M.G., in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XIII, Oversby, V.M. and Brown, P.W. (eds.). Materials Research Soc. Symp. Vol. 176, 457–464 (1990).Google Scholar
12. Sunder, S., Boyer, G.D. and Miller, N.H., J. Nucl. Mater. 175, 163 (1990).Google Scholar
13. Christensen, H.. in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XIV, Abrajano, T.A. Jr, and Johnson, L.H. (eds.). Materials Research Soc. Symp. Proc. Vol.212, 213–220 (1991).Google Scholar
14. Sunder, S., Shoesmith, D.W., Bailey, M.G., Stanchell, F.W. and McIntyre, N.S., J. Electroanal. Chem. 130, 163 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Shoesmith, D.W., Sunder, S., Ikeda, B.M. and King, F., in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XII, Lutze, V. and Ewing, R.C. (eds.). Materials Research Soc. Symp. Proc. Vol. 127, 279–291 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Needes, C. R.S., Nicol, M.J. and Finkelstein, N.P., in Leaching and Reduction in Hydrometallurgy, Burkin, A.R. (ed.). 12–19 (1975).Google Scholar
17. Lemire, R.J. and Garisto, F., The Solubility of U, Np, Pu, Th and Tc in a Geological Disposal Vault for Used Nuclear Fuel, Atomic Energy of Canada Limited Report, AECL-10009 (1989).Google Scholar
18. McIntyre, N.S., Sunder, S., Shoesmith, D.W. and Stanchell, F.W.. 1981. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 18, 714 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. Shoesmith, D.W., Sunder, S., Bailey, M.G., Wallace, G.J. and Stanchell, F.W., Applic. of Surf. Sci. 20, 39 (1984).Google Scholar
20. Nicol, M.J. and Needes, C. R. S., Electrochimica Acta 20, 585, (1975).Google Scholar
21. Sunder, S., Shoesmith, D.W., Lemire, R.J., Bailey, M.G. and Wallace, G.J., Corrosion Science, 32(4), 373, (1991).Google Scholar