Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T07:31:20.018Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Corrosion Testing of a Simulated Five-Metal Epsilon Particle in Spent Nuclear Fuel

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2011

D.J. Wronkiewicz ,
C.S. Watkins ,
A.C. Baughman ,
F.S. Miller  and
S.F. Wolf
D.J. Wronkiewicz
Affiliation:
University of Missouri-Rolla, Dept. Geology & Geophysics, Rolla, MO, [email protected]
C.S. Watkins
Affiliation:
University of Missouri-Rolla, Dept. Geology & Geophysics, Rolla, MO, [email protected]
A.C. Baughman
Affiliation:
University of Missouri-Rolla, Dept. Geology & Geophysics, Rolla, MO, [email protected]
F.S. Miller
Affiliation:
University of Missouri-Rolla, Dept. Metallurgical Engineering, Rolla, MO
S.F. Wolf
Affiliation:
Indiana State University, Dept. Chemistry, Terre Haute, IN
Get access

Abstract

The five-metal epsilon particle represents an important component with respect to the corrosion of spent nuclear fuel as it is the principal host for 99Tc. This radionuclide has a high solubility in oxidizing environments (as TcO4 -), a half-life of 213,000 years, and has been proposed as a monitor for the corrosion rate of spent fuel. As such, an understanding of the corrosion processes affecting epsilon particles may have important implications on our ability to accurately assess radionuclide release rates from spent nuclear fuel.

Non-radioactive metal powders were mixed in an atomic percent ratio of 40% Mo, 30% Ru, 15% Pd, 10% Re, and 5% Rh (Re used as a surrogate for Tc), a composition that simulates epsilon particles in spent reactor fuel [1,2]. The powders were electric arc-melted in the presence of an Ar-purged atmosphere. Scanning electron microscopy images of the as-cast samples denote a primary sample heterogeneity, with two distinct zones, each composed of a mixture of very fine-grained Mo-, Mo-Ru-Re, and Mo-Ru-Pd rich crystals. Results from vapor hydration tests (200°C) for time periods up to 35 days indicate the formation of Mo- and Reenriched alteration phases. Phase growth was enhanced when air was periodically replenished in the test vessels suggesting that oxide and/or hydroxide alteration phases may play a role in the corrosion process. MCC-1 tests (90°C) were conducted for time periods up to 182 days in leachant solutions that were prepared with either a) deionized water or b) deionized water acidified with nitric acid to a pH of 3.0. Solutions from the deionized water tests progressively decreased in pH with increasing reaction time (5.5 to 4.0), while the pH values remained at a near-constant value of 3.0 in the acidified solutions. Solution results indicate a preferential release of Mo followed by Re. Normalized Re/Mo release ratios varied from 0.20 to 0.86, and increased as a function of reaction time and acidity. Release of the platinum group metals (Pd, Rh, and Ru) was relatively insignificant in comparison to Mo and Re.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 713: Symposium JJ – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XXV , 2002 , JJ14.4
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1) Thomas, L.E., Einziger, R.E., and Woodley, R.E., J. Nucl. Mater. 166, pp. 243–251 (1989).Google Scholar
2) Thomas, L.E. and Guenther, R.J., in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XII, edited by Lutze, W. and Ewing, R.C. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 127, Pittsburgh, PA, 1989) pp. 293–300.Google Scholar
3) Barner, J.O., Characterization of LWR spent fuel MCC-approved testing material, Pacific Northwest Laboratory Report PNL-5109 Rev. 1 (1985).Google Scholar
4) TSPA-VA, Viability Assessment of a Repository at Yucca Mountain, Total System Performance Assessment, section 3.5.1.5, DOE/RW-0508/V3 (1998).Google Scholar
5) Finn, P.A., Hoh, J.C., Wolf, S.F., Surchik, M.T., Buck, E.C., and Bates, J.K., in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XX, edited by Gray, W.J. and Triay, I.R. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 465, Pittsburgh, PA, 1997) pp. 527–534.Google Scholar
6) Binary Alloy Phase Diagrams, vol. 2, edited by Massalski, T.A. (1986).Google Scholar
7) Wronkiewicz, D.J., Wang, L.M., Bates, J.K., and Tani, B.S., in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XVI, edited Interrante, by C.G. and Pabalan, R.T. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 294, Pittsburgh, PA, 1993) pp. 183–190.Google Scholar
8)American Society for Testing and Materials, C 1220–98, Standard test method for static leaching of monolithic waste forms for disposal of radioactive waste.Google Scholar
9) Wronkiewicz, D.J., in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XVII, edited by Barkatt, A. and Konynenburg, R.A. Van (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 333, Pittsburgh, PA, 1994) pp. 83–97.Google Scholar
10) Cui, D., Eriksen, T., and Eklund, U-B, in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XXIV, edited by Hart, K.P. and Lumpkin, G.R. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 663, Pittsburgh, PA, 2001) pp. 427–434.Google Scholar
11) Buck, E.C., Wronkiewicz, D.J., Finn, P.A., and Bates, J.K., J. Nucl. Mater., 249, pp. 70–76 (1997).Google Scholar