Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T08:18:29.533Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Gel Point Determination in Curing Polydimethylsiloxane Polymer Networks by Longitudinal Ultrasonic Waves

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

A. Shefer
Affiliation:
Chemical Engineering Department, Ben Gurion University, Beer Sheva 84105, Israel
G. Gorodetsky
Affiliation:
Physics Department, Ben Gurion University, Beer Sheva 84105, Israel
M. Gottlieb
Affiliation:
Chemical Engineering Department, Ben Gurion University, Beer Sheva 84105, Israel
Get access

Abstract

The formation of well characterized poly-dimethylsiloxane networks has been studied by means of an acoustic interferometer. The hydrosilation reaction used to form these networks was followed by infra red spectroscopy. The relative changes in velocity of the ultrasonic longitudinal waves propagating through the system are found to be very sensitive to gelation and to the density of crosslinks. Due to our simultaneous kinetic and ultrasonic studies it was possible to relate the changes in acoustic properties of the curing system directly to the cure state.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Flory, P.J., Principles of Polymer Chemistry, (Cornell Univ. Press, Ithaca, NY, 1953).Google Scholar
2. Treolar, L.R.G., The Physics of Rubber Elasticity, 3rd ed., (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1975)Google Scholar
3. Mark, J.E., Adv. Polym. Sci. 44, 1 (1982).Google Scholar
4. Eichinger, B.E., Ann. Rev. Phys. Chem. 34, 359 (1983).Google Scholar
5. Edwards, S.F. and Vilgis, T.A., Reports on Prog. Phys., in press (1988).Google Scholar
6. Kramer, O., Biological and Synthetic Networks, (Elsevier, London, 1988).Google Scholar
7. Lipshitz, S. and Macosko, C.W., Polym. Eng. Sci. 16, 803 (1976).Google Scholar
8. Adam, M., Delsanti, M., Durand, D., Hild, G. and Munch, J.P., Pure Appl. Chem. 53, 1489 (1981).Google Scholar
9. Adam, M., Delsanti, M., and Durand, D., Macromolecules 18, 2285 (1985).Google Scholar
10. Valles, E.M. and Macosko, C.W., Macromolecules 12, 521 (1979).Google Scholar
11. Farris, R.J. and Lee, C., Polym. Eng. Sci. 23, 586 (1983).Google Scholar
12. Winter, H.H. and Chambon, F., J. Rheol. 30, 367 (1986).Google Scholar
13. Bacri, J.C. and Rajaonarison, R., J. de Phys. Lett. 40, L5 (1979).Google Scholar
14. Dumas, J. and Bacri, J.C., J. de Phys. Lett. 41, L279, L-282 (1980).Google Scholar
15. Hartmann, B. and Lee, G., J. Polym. Sci. Polym. Phys. Ed. 20, 1269 (1982).Google Scholar
16. Hunston, D.L., Rev. Prog. Quant. Non Destructive Eval. 2B, 1711 (1983).Google Scholar
17. Hartmann, B., in Methods in Experimental Physics Vol.16, edited by Fava, R.A. (Academic Press, NY, 1980).Google Scholar
18. Fisher, A. and Gottlieb, M., Proc. of Networks 86, Elsinore Denmark, 1986.Google Scholar
19. Mason, W.P., Physical Acoustics - Principles and Methods, vol.1- Part A, (Academic Press, N.Y., 1964).Google Scholar
20. Miller, D.R. and Macosko, C.W., Macromolecules 9, 199 (1976); 9, 206 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar