Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T13:00:55.475Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Boule Shape Dependence of Shear and von-Mises Stress Distributions in Bulk SiC during Sublimation Growth

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Roman Victorovich Drachev
Affiliation:
[email protected][email protected], Dow Corning Corp, DCCSS, Auburn, Michigan, United States
Darren Hansen
Affiliation:
[email protected]@hotmail.com
Mark J Loboda
Affiliation:
[email protected], Dow Corning Corp, DCCSS, Auburn, Michigan, United States
Get access

Abstract

An analytical study of the dependence of shear and von-Mises stress distributions, which develop during PVT (Physical Vapor Transport) growth of 4H-SiC, has been executed. The key parameters investigated include thermal conditions of the crystal growth and parameters of the growing boule geometry. The evaluation was conducted via a 24 full factorial DOE (Design of Experiments). Parameters of the growing boule geometry, i.e. seed diameter, growth front height, inclination angle and height of the side surface were set as the DOE factors, while responses were calculated using numerical simulations. It is found that unique SiC boule growth conditions, which simultaneously minimize both the shear stress and von Mises stress magnitudes, cannot be achieved. Optimization of the shear stress distribution favors longer SiC boules with small seed diameters, small expansion angles and flat growth fronts. Alternatively, optimization of von-Mises stress favors short crystals with small seed diameters and small expansion angles but with curved growth fronts. Consequently, optimization of stress components in SiC crystals involves careful investigation of the interaction and compromise of the reaction cell geometry and growth conditions.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Selder, M., Kadinski, L., Durst, F., Straubinder, T.L., Wellmann, P.L. and Hofmann, D., Mater. Sci. Forum Vols. 353–356 (2001) 65.Google Scholar
[2] Cherednichenko, D. I., Drachev, R. V., Khlebnikov, I. I., Deng, X. and Sudarshan, T. S., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. Vol. 742 (2003) K2.18.1 Google Scholar
[3] Stroh, A.N., Proceedings of Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 223 (1954) 404.Google Scholar
[4] Lee, J.W., Skowronski, M., Sanchez, E.K. and Chung, G., J. Cryst. Growth, Vol. 310 (2008) 4126.Google Scholar
[5] Dudley, M., Zhang, N., Zhang, Y., Raghothamachar, B., Byrapp, S., Choi, G., Sanchez, E. K., Hansen, D., Drachev, R. and Loboda, M.J., Mater. Sci. Forum Vols. 645–648 (2010) 291.Google Scholar