Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T23:45:45.713Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Thermo-mechanical and swelling properties of three-dimensional-printed poly (ethylene glycol) diacrylate/silica nanocomposites

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 September 2018

John Ryan C. Dizon
Affiliation:
Department of Macromolecular Science and Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA Department of Industrial Engineering, College of Engineering and Architecture, Bataan Peninsula State University, City of Balanga, Bataan 2100, Philippines
Qiyi Chen
Affiliation:
Department of Macromolecular Science and Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA
Arnaldo D. Valino
Affiliation:
Department of Macromolecular Science and Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA
Rigoberto C. Advincula*
Affiliation:
Department of Macromolecular Science and Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA
*
Address all correspondence to Rigoberto C. Advincula at [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Three-dimensional (3D) printed poly (ethylene glycol) diacrylate (PEGDA) objects have been reinforced with 1%, 3% and 5% silica (SiO2) nanoparticles. Rheological characterizations were conducted for each formulation and 3D-printed using a stereolithographic apparatus (SLA) 3D printer. The tensile and compressive properties of the as-printed nanocomposites were investigated and compared with unreinforced samples. Additionally, the mechanical properties of the objects before and after swelling the samples in deionized water were compared with as-printed ones. Adding SiO2 increased the tensile and compressive strengths of the 3D-printed PEGDA. The tensile and compressive strengths of swollen PEGDA/SiO2 nanocomposite specimens were generally higher than the unswollen specimens.

Type
Research Letters
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Dizon, J., Espera, A.H., Chen, Q., and Advincula, R.: Mechanical characterization of 3D-printed polymers. Additive Manuf. 20, 44 (2018).Google Scholar
2.Attaran, M.: The rise of 3-D printing: the advantages of additive manufacturing over traditional manufacturing. Bus. Horizons 60, 677 (2017).Google Scholar
3.Weng, Z., Zhou, Y., Lin, W., Senthil, T., and Wu, L.: Structure-property relationship of nano enhanced stereolithography resin for desktop SLA 3D printer. Composites: Part A 88, 234 (2016).Google Scholar
4.Crivello, J. and Reichmanis, E.: Photopolymer materials and processes for advanced technologies. Chem. Mater. 26, 533 (2014).Google Scholar
5.Kannurpatti, A., Anseth, J., and Bowman, C.: A study of the evolution of mechanical properties and structural heterogeneity of polymer networks formed by photopolymerizations of multifunctional (meth)acrylates. Polymer 39, 2507 (1998).Google Scholar
6.Gojzewski, H., Sadej, M., Andrzejewska, E., and Kokowska, M.: Nanoscale Young's modulus and surface morphology in photocurable polyacrylate/nanosilica composites. Eur. Polym. J. 88, 205 (2017).Google Scholar
7.Sadej-Bajerlain, M., Gojzewski, H., and Andrzejewska, E.: Monomer/modified nanosilica systems: photopolymerization kinetics and composite characterization. Polymer 52, 1495 (2011).Google Scholar
8.Palmero, P.: Structural ceramic nanocomposites: a review of properties and powders’ synthesis methods. Nanomaterials 5, 656 (2015).Google Scholar
9.Beun, S., Glorieux, T., Devaux, J., Vreven, J., and Leloup, G.: Characterization of nanofilled compared to universal and microfilled composites. Dental Mater. 23, 51 (2007).Google Scholar
10.Manapat, J., Mangadlao, J., Tiu, B., Tritchler, G., and Advincula, R.: High-strength stereolithographic 3D printed nanocomposites: graphene oxide metastability. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9, 10085 (2017).Google Scholar
11.de Leon, A., Chen, Q., Palaganas, N., Palaganas, J., Manapat, J., and Advincula, R.: High performance polymer nanocomposites for additive manufacturing applications. React. Funct. Polym. 103, 141 (2016).Google Scholar
12.Liu, H. and Mo, J.: Study on nanosilica reinforced stereolithography resin. J. Reinf. Plast. Compos. 29, 909 (2010).Google Scholar
13.Gong, H., Beauchamp, M., Perry, S., Woolley, A., and Nordin, G.: Optical approach to resin formulation for 3D printed microfluidics. RSC Adv. 5, 106621 (2015).Google Scholar
14.Rogers, C., Pagaduan, J., Nordin, G., and Woolley, A.: Single-monomer formulation of polymerized polyethylene glycol diacrylate as a nonadsorptive material for microfluidics. Anal. Chem. 83, 6418 (2011).Google Scholar
15.Kim, P., Jeong, H., Khademhosseini, A., and Suh, K.: Fabrication of non-biofouling polyethylene glycol micro- and nanochannels by ultraviolet-assisted irreversible sealing. Lab. Chip. 6, 1432 (2006).Google Scholar
16.Cuchiara, M., Allen, A., Chen, T., Miller, J., and West, J.: Multilayer microfluidic PEGDA hydrogels. Biomaterials 31, 5491 (2010).Google Scholar
17.Sacca, A., Pedicini, R., Carbone, A., and Passalacqua, E.: Comparative investigation on nano-sized SiO2 as a Filler for Proton Exchange Membranes (PEM) Fuel Cells. ECS Trans. 11, 1553 (2007).Google Scholar
19.Chartier, T., Badev, A., Abouliatima, Y., Lebaudy, P., and Lecamp, L.: Stereolithography process: influence of the rheology of silica suspensions and of the medium on polymerization kinetics – Cured depth and width. J. Eur. Ceramic Soc. 32, 1625 (2012).Google Scholar
20.Hinczewski, C., Corbel, S., and Chartier, T.: Ceramic suspensions suitable for stereolithography. J. Eur. Ceramic Soc. 18, 583 (1998).Google Scholar
21.Wozniak, M., de Hazan, T., Graule, T., and Kata, D.: Rheology of UV curable colloidal silica dispersions for rapid prototyping applications. J. Eur. Ceramic Soc. 31, 2221 (2011).Google Scholar
22.Wozniak, M., Graule, T., de Hazan, Y., Kata, D., and Lis, J.: Highly loaded UV curable nanosilica dispersions for rapid prototyping applications. J. Eur. Ceramic Soc. 29, 2259 (2009).Google Scholar
23.Ottenbrite, R., Kinam, P., and Okano, T.: Biomedical Applications of Hydrogels Handbook. Springer-Verlag, New York (2010).Google Scholar
24.Tighe, B.: The role of permeability and related properties in the design of synthetic hydrogels for biomedical applications. Br. Polym. J. 18, 8 (1986).Google Scholar
25.Wong, R., Ashton, M., and Dodou, K.: Effect of crosslinking agent concentration on the properties of unmedicated hydrogels. Pharmaceutics 7, 305 (2015).Google Scholar
28.Cornelissen, J. and Waterman, H.: The viscosity temperature relationship of liquids. Chem. Eng. Sci. 4, 238 (1955).Google Scholar
29.Horkay, F. and Zrinyi, M.: Studies on mechanical and swelling behavior of polymer networks on the basis of the scaling concept. 7. Effect of deformation on the swelling equilibrium concentration of gels. Macromolecules 21, 3260 (1998).Google Scholar
30.Oka, Y., Sakohara, S., Gotoh, T., and Iizawa, T.: Measurements of mechanical properties on a swollen hydrogel by a tension test method. Polym. J. 36, 59 (2004).Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Dizon et al. supplementary material

Dizon et al. supplementary material 1

Download Dizon et al. supplementary material(File)
File 946 KB