Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-m9pkr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-09T11:14:53.694Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Imaging of Big and Messy Biological Structures Using Electron Tomography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2018

Gina E. Sosinsky
Affiliation:
University of California
Maryann E. Martone
Affiliation:
University of California

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Any student of cell biology cannot help but be impressed with the exquisite organization of cellular and subcellular compartments, where Individual proteins and even nucleic acids are targeted to specific domains and held together in macromolecular assemblies to achieve orderly and efficient interactions. Perhaps nowhere is the specialization of cellular compartments more apparent than in the nervous system, where the cell contains multiple, well-defined functional domains, each with its own unique biochemical character.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America 2003

References

Reference and Notes

1. McEwen, BF. Marko, M (2001) The emergence of electron tomography as an important tool for investigating cellular ultrastructure. J Histochem Cyiochem 49:553-564.Google Scholar
2. Baumeister, W, Grimm, R, Walz, J (1999) Electron tomography of molecules and cells. Trends in Cell Biology 9:81 -85.Google Scholar
3. Steven, AC, Aebl, U (2003. The next ice age: cryo-electron tomography of intact cells. Trends Cell Biol 13:107-110.Google Scholar
4. Martone, ME, DeerinckTJ, Young SJ, Ellisman ME (1999)Three-dimensional protein localization using high voltage electron microscopy. Acta Histochemica Cytochemica 32:35-43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Bohm, J, Frangakis, AS, Hegerl R, Nickell S, Typke D, Baumeister W (2000. Toward detecting and identifying macromolecules in a cellular context: template matching applied to electron tomograms. PNAS 97: H245-14250.Google Scholar
6. Medalia, O, Weber, I, Frangakis AS, Nlcastro D, Gerlsch G, Baumeister W (2002. Macramole.cufar architecture in eukarydtic cells visualized by cryoelectron tomography. Science 298:1209-1213.Google Scholar
7. Harlow, ML, Ress, D., Stoschek, A, Marshall RM. McMahan UJ (2001)The architecture of active zone material at the frog's neuramuscular junction. Nature 409:479-484.Google Scholar
8.Science (2002). 298:2297-303Google Scholar
9.The contact URL's for the three Research Resources are: http://bio3d.cotorado.edu, http://www.wadsworth.org/rvbc andGoogle Scholar
10. Frank, J, ed (1992. Electron Tomography. New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Rademacher, M (1992. Weighted back-projection methods. In: Electron Tomography (Frank J, ed), pp 91115. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
12. Ladinsky, MS. Kremer, JR. Furcinitti RS, Mclntosh JR, Howell KE (1994) HVEM tomography of the trans-Golgi network: structural Insights and Identification of a lace-like vesicle coat. JCB 127:29-38.Google Scholar
13. Soto, GE, Young, SJ, Martone ME. Deerinck TJ, Lamont S, Carragher BO, Hama K, Ellisman MH (1994. Serial section electron tomography: a method for three-dimensional reconstruction of large structures. Neurcimage 1:230-243.Google Scholar
14. Marsh, BJ. Mastronarde DN, Buttle KF, Howell KE, Mclntosh JR (2001. Organellar relationships in the Golgl region of the pancreatic beta cell line, H1T-T15, visualized by high resolution electron tomography. Proc Natl Acad Scl U S A 98:2399-2406.Google Scholar
15. Martone, ME, Deerinck, TJ, Yamacla N, Bushong E, Ellisman MH (2000) Correlated 3D light and electron microscopy: Use of high voltage electron microscopy and electron tomography for imaging large biological structures. Journal of Histotechnology 23:261-270,Google Scholar
16. Wilson, CJ. Mastronarde, DN. McEwen B, Frank J (1992) Measurement of neurona I surface area using high-voltage electron microscope tomography. Neuroimage 1:11-22.Google Scholar
17. Mastronarde, DN (1997) Dual-axis tomography: an approach with alignment methods that preserve resolution. J Struct Bioi 120:343-352.Google Scholar
18. Penczek, P, Marko, M, Buttle K, Frank J (1995. Double-tilt electron tomography. Ultramicroscopy 60:393-410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.The Shannon sampling criterion dictates that the minimum theoretical resolution attainable is twice that of the pixel sampling size. In practice, the pixel sampling of digitized images or digital CCD images must be over-sampled (e.g. at least 3-4 times the desired resolution).Google Scholar
20. McEwen, BF, Downing, KH, Glaeser RM (1995) The relevance of dosefractionation In tomography of radiation-sensitive specimens. Ultramicroscopy 60:357-373.Google Scholar
21. Saxton, WO, Baumeister W, Harm M (1984. Three-dimensional reconstruction of imperfect two-dimensionai crystals. Ultramicroscopy 13: 57-70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22. Kremer, JR, Mastronarde DN, Mclntosh JR (1996) Computer visualization of three-dimensional image data using I MOD, J Struct Biol 116:71-76.Google Scholar
23. Fung, JC, Liu W, de Ruijter WJ, Chen H. Abbey CK, Sedat JW, Agard DA (1996. Toward fully automated high-resolution electron tomography. J Struct Bio! 116:181-189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24. Peltier, ST, Lin, AW, Lee D, Mock S, Lamont S, Molina T, Wong M.DaiL, Martone ME, Ellisman MH (2002) The telescience portal for advanced tomography applications. Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing: Computational Grids in press.Google Scholar
25. Nicastro, D, Frangakis, AS, Typke D, Baumeister W (2000) Cryo-electron tomography of neurospora mitochondria. J Struct Biol 129:48-56,Google Scholar
26. Frank, J, Wagenknecht T, McEwen BF, Marko M, Hsieh CE, Mannella CA (2002) Three-dimensional imaging of biological complexity. J Struct Biol 138:85-91.Google Scholar
27. Grimm, R, Barmann, M, Hackl W, Typke D, Sackmann E, Baumeister W (1997. Energy filtered electron tomography of ice-embedded actin and vesicles. Biophys J 72:482-489.Google Scholar
28. Hsieh, CE, Marko, M, Frank J, Mannella CA (2002) Electron tomographic analysis of frozen-h yd rated tissue sections. J Struct Biol 138:63-73.Google Scholar
29. Deerinck, TJ, Martone, ME, Lev-Ram V, Green DPL.Tsien RY, Spector DL, Huang S, Ellisman MH (1994) Fluorescence photooxidation with eosin: a method for high resolution Immunolocalization and in situ hybidization detect for light and electron microscopy, JCB 126:910-910,Google Scholar
30. Huang, S, Deerinck, TJ, Ellisman MH, Spector DL (1997) The dynamic organization of the perinucleolar compartment in the cell nucleus. JCB 137:965-974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
31. Capani, F, Ellisman, MH, Martone ME (2001. Filamentous actin is concentrated in specific subpopulations of neuronal and glial structures in rat central nervous system. Brain Res 923:1-11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32. Maranto, A (1982. Neuronal mapping: a photooxidation reaction makes Lucifer Yellow useful for electron microscopy. Science 217:953-955.Google Scholar
33. Sandell, JH, Masland, RH (1988) Photoconversion ofsome fluorescent markers to a diaminabenzidine product. JHistCyto 36:555-559.Google Scholar
34. Capani, F, Deerinck, TJ, Ellisman MH, Bushong E, Bobik M, Martone ME (2001) Phalloidin-eosin followed by photo-oxidation: a novel method for localizing F-actin at the light and electron microscopic levels. J Histochem Cytochem 49:1351-1361.Google Scholar
35. Stiles, JR, Bartol, TM, Salpeter MM, Salpeter EE, Sejnowski TJ (2001) Synaptic variability: new insights from reconstructions and Monte Carlo simulations with MCell, In: Synapses (Cowan WM, Sudhof TC, Stevens CF, eds): Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
36. Loew, LM. Schaff, JC (2001) The Virtual Cell: a software environment for computational cell biology. Trends Biotechnol 19:401-406.Google Scholar
37.c.f. the Cell Centered Database http://ncmir.ucsd.edu/CCDB and the Macromolecular Structure Database http://www.ebi.ac.uk/Google Scholar
38.In addition to the references cited above, there are several review and research articles that are excellent resources for the field of electron tomography. These include the Journal of Structural Biology volumes 120 and 138; Baumeister & Steven (2000), Trends Biocbem Scl, 25: 624-31; Baumeister, Grimm, & Walz, Trends Cell Biol. (1999) 9: 81-85: Martone et al., (1999) Acta Histochem. Cytochem 32:35-43; McEwen & Frank, (2001) Curr Opin Neurobiol. 11: 594-600; and McEwen & Marko. J. Histochem, Cytochem. (2001) 49: 553-64; The preceding article was adapted from a Microscopy Society of America 2002 annual meeting abstract by Soslnsky and the material was presented as a biological tutorial.Google Scholar