Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T21:56:10.174Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Confocal Microscopy for Diagnostic Cytology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2018

Mathilde E. Boon
Affiliation:
Leiden Cytology and Pathology Laboratory
Lambrecht P. Kok*
Affiliation:
Neuro Imaging Center, University of Groningen, The Netherlands

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Laser scanning confocal microscopy has been used to analyze cytological specimens for research purposes. However, for many pathologists, its application in diagnostic cytology still is terra incognita. In our laboratory, confocal microscopy has been used for seven years, mainly to solve problems in cervical cytology, in breast aspirates, and for endometrium cytology.

In contrast to histology where we can cut new sections from the block, the cytologic sample is often limited to one smear. Accordingly, when we wish to expand our diagnostic possibilities, we have to extract the desired additional information from that single smear. This is possible by first de-staining the original smear and subsequently re-staining it. In this article, we describe how we restain old slides with the fluorescent dyes Ethidinm Bromide and Eosin, a DNA/protein stain, resulting in staining patterns comparable to the diagnostic Papanicolaou and Giemsa methods in that mere is an optimal distinction between nucleus and cytoplasm.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America 2004

References

1. Boon, ME, Kok, LP: Confocal microscopic imaging of the Pap smear. In: Techniques in Diagnostic Pathology, vol. 3, Bullock, GR, Velzen, D Van, Warhol, MJ (eds), Academic Press Ltd, London, pp: 7789, 1992.Google Scholar
2. Boon, ME, Kok, LP, Sutedja, G, Dutrieux RP, : Confocal sectioning of thick, otherwise un-diagnosable cell groupings in cervical smears. Acta Cytol 37:4048, 1993.Google ScholarPubMed
3. Boon, ME, Schut, JJ, Benita, EM, Kok, LP: Confocal optical sectioning arid three-dimensional reconstruction of carcinoma fragments in Pap smears using sophisticated image data processing. Diagn Cytopalhol 10:268275, 1994.Google Scholar
4. Boon, ME, Sutedja-Bol, G, Kok, LP: Confocal microscopy in diagnostic cytology. In: Three-Dimensional Confocal Microscopy: Volume Investigation of Biological Specimens. Stevens, JK, Mills, LR, Trogadis, JE (eds). San Diego, California: Academic Press, Inc. pp 353375, 1994.Google Scholar
5. Boon, ME, Schut, JJ, Suurmeifer, AJH, Benita, EM, Hut, PKH, Kok, LP: Confocal microscopy of false-negative breast aspirates, Diagn Cytopathol 12, 4250(1995)Google Scholar
6. Boon, ME, Luzzatto, R, Brucker, N, Recktenvald, MS, Benita, EM: Diagnostic efficacy of endometrial cytology with the Abradul Cell Sampler supplemented by laser scanning confocal microscopy. Acta Cytol 40, 277282 (1996)Google Scholar