Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T13:13:58.697Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Relevance of In-Situ Electrochemical STEM Observations to Li-Metal Batteries for Evaluating Performance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 July 2022

Katherine Jungjohann ,
Laura Merrill ,
Renae Gannon ,
Daniel Long ,
Steven Randolph  and
Katharine Harrison
Katherine Jungjohann*
Affiliation:
National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Analytical Microscopy and Imaging Sciences, Golden, CO, United States
Laura Merrill
Affiliation:
Sandia National Laboratories, Nanoscale Sciences, Albuquerque, NM, United States
Renae Gannon
Affiliation:
Thermo Fisher Scientific, NanoPort, Hillsboro, OR, United States
Daniel Long
Affiliation:
Air Force Research Laboratory, Dayton, OH, United States
Steven Randolph
Affiliation:
Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Center for Nanophase Material Sciences, Oak Ridge, TN, United States
Katharine Harrison
Affiliation:
Sandia National Laboratories, Nanoscale Sciences, Albuquerque, NM, United States
*
*Corresponding author: [email protected]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
From Operando Microcell Experiments to Bulk Devices
Information
Microscopy and Microanalysis , Volume 28 , Supplement S1 , August 2022 , pp. 826 - 827
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America 2022

References

Williamson, MJ et al. Nature Materials 2 (2003), p. 532. doi:10.1038/nmat944CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leenheer, AJ et al. Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems 24 (2015), p. 1061. doi:101109/JMEMS.2014.2380771CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, ER et al. ACS Nano 6 (2012), p. 6308. doi: 10.1021/nn3017469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leenheer, AJ et al. ACS Nano 9 (2015), p. 4379. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.5b00876CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, KL et al. ACS Nano 11 (2017), p. 11194. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.7b05513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, KL et al. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 13 (2021), p. 31668. doi: 10.1021/acsami.1c06488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, KL et al. Iscience 24 (2021), 103394. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2021.103394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jungjohann, KL et al. ACS Energy Letters 6 (2021), p. 2138. doi: 10.1021/acsenergylett.1c00509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merrill, LC et al. ACS Applied Energy Materials 4 (2021), p. 7589. doi: 10.1021/acsaem.1c00874CrossRefGoogle Scholar
This work was performed, in part, at the Center for Integrated Nanotechnologies, an Office of Science User Facility operated for the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Science. Sandia National Laboratories is a multimission laboratory managed and operated by National Technology & Engineering Solutions of Sandia, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Honeywell International, Inc., for the U.S. DOE's National Nuclear Security Administration under contract DE-NA-0003525. This work was authored in part by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, operated by Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC, for the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) under Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308. The views expressed in the article do not necessarily represent the views of the U.S. DOE or the United States Government. The U.S. Government retains and the publisher, by accepting the article for publication, acknowledges that the U.S. Government retains a nonexclusive, paid-up, irrevocable, worldwide license to publish or reproduce the published form of this work, or allow others to do so, for U.S. Government purposes.Google Scholar