Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T00:48:36.304Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Drying Effect Creates False Assemblies in DNA-Coated Gold Nanoparticles as Determined Through In Situ Liquid Cell STEM

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 March 2014

Angela R. Rudolph
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164-4630, USA Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM 87185, USA
Katherine L. Jungjohann*
Affiliation:
Sandia National Laboratories, Center for Integrated Nanotechnologies, Albuquerque, NM 87185, USA
David R. Wheeler
Affiliation:
Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM 87185, USA
Susan M. Brozik
Affiliation:
Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM 87185, USA
*
*Corresponding author. [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The drying effect associated with utilizing transmission electron microscopy to study deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA)-coated gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) remains largely uninvestigated, though this technique is frequently utilized to characterize nanoparticle–DNA interactions. Investigation of the drying effect is essential to the progress of the many fields that utilize AuNPs, including cancer research. In this study, we compare DNA hybridization-directed nanoparticle assemblies with control samples omitting the necessary complementary DNA, effectively blocking directed assembly, in both the liquid state and the dry state, within a scanning transmission electron microscope. We show that the dry samples contain AuNPs spaced at significantly smaller intervals than identical samples measured in situ, with no dependence on the DNA bound to the AuNPs in the dry samples. A partially wet sample, with distances measured along the drying edge, provided an intermediate binding distance, strengthening the conclusion that drastic differences observed between the dry and in situ samples are due to a pronounced drying effect. This drying effect will falsely indicate certain grouping arrangements and will change the impression of the size of the groups formed, providing misinformation for the development of these controlled assemblies that could impact applications such as targeted drug vehicles for cancer treatment.

Type
In Situ Special Section
Copyright
© Microscopy Society of America 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

We dedicate this work to the memory of Susan M. Brozik, our friend and mentor. Her ideas and enthusiasm will always be with us; her vivacious nature and brilliant mind will be greatly missed.

References

Cai, W., Gao, T., Hong, H. & Sun, J. (2008). Applications of gold nanoparticles in cancer nanotechnology. Nanotechnol Sci Appl 1, 1732.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chi, Q., Wang, G. & Jiang, J. (2013). The persistence length and length per base of single-stranded DNA obtained from fluorescence correlation spectroscopy measurements using mean field theory. Phys A 392, 10721079.Google Scholar
de Jonge, N., Peckys, D.B., Kremers, G.J. & Piston, D.W. (2009). Electron microscopy of whole cells in liquid with nanometer resolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106, 21592164.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duncan, B., Kim, C. & Rotello, V.M. (2010). Gold nanoparticle platforms as drug and biomacromolecule delivery systems. J Controlled Release 148, 122127.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elbaz, J., Cecconello, A., Fan, Z., Govorov, A.O. & Willner, I. (2013). Powering the programmed nanostructure and function of gold nanoparticles with catenated DNA machines. Nat Commun 4, 2000.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Evans, J.E., Jungjohann, K.L., Browning, N.D. & Arslan, I. (2011). Controlled growth of nanoparticles from solution with in situ liquid transmission electron microscopy. Nano Lett 11, 28092813.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Franklin, R.E. & Gosling, R.G. (1953). The structure of sodium thymonucleate fibres. I. The influence of water content. Acta Cryst 6, 673677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartel, P., Rose, H. & Dinges, C. (1996). Conditions and reasons for incoherent imaging in STEM. Ultramicroscopy 63, 93114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jungjohann, K.L., Evans, J.E., Aguiar, J.A., Arslan, I. & Browning, N.D. (2012). Atomic-scale imaging and spectroscopy for in situ liquid scanning transmission electron microscopy. Microsc Microanal 18, 621627.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lermusiaux, L., Sereda, A., Portier, B., Larquet, E. & Bidault, S. (2012). Reversible switching of the interparticle distance in DNA-templated gold nanoparticle dimers. ACS Nano 6, 1099210998.Google ScholarPubMed
Li, D., Nielsen, M.H., Lee, J.R.I., Frandsen, C., Banfield, J.F. & De Yoreo, J.J. (2012). Direction-specific interactions control crystal growth by oriented attachement. Science 336, 10141018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liao, H., Cui, L., Whitelam, S. & Zheng, H. (2012). Real-time imaging of Pt3Fe nanorod growth in solution. Science 336, 10111014.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liu, Y., Tai, K. & Dillon, S.J. (2013). Growth kinetics and morphological evolution of ZnO precipitated from solution. Chem Mater 25, 29272933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loweth, C.J., Caldwell, W.B., Peng, X., Alivisatos, A.P. & Schultz, P.G. (1999). DNA-based assembly of gold nanocrystals. Angew Chem Int Ed 38, 18081812.3.0.CO;2-C>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Norberg, J. & Nilsson, L. (2000). On the truncation of long-range electrostatic interactions in DNA. Biophys J 79, 15371553.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parent, L.R., Robinson, D.B., Woehl, T.J., Ristenpart, W.D., Evans, J.E., Browning, N.D. & Arslan, I. (2012). Direct in situ observation of nanoparticle synthesis in a liquid crystal surfactant template. ACS Nano 6, 35893596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, J., Zheng, H., Lee, W.C., Geissler, P.L., Rabani, E. & Alivisatos, A.P. (2012). Direct observation of nanoparticle superlattice formation by using liquid cell transmission electron microscopy. ACS Nano 6, 20782085.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Patra, C.R., Bhattacharya, R., Mukhopadhyay, D. & Mukherjee, P. (2010). Fabrication of gold nanoparticles for targeted therapy in pancreatic cancer. Adv Drug Delivery Rev 62, 346361.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pissuwan, D., Niidome, T. & Cortie, M.B. (2011). The forthcoming applications of gold nanoparticles in drug and gene delivery systems. J Controlled Release 149, 6571.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rana, S., Bajaj, A., Mout, R. & Rotello, V.M. (2012). Monolayer coated gold nanoparticles for delivery applications. Adv Drug Delivery Rev 64, 200216.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Talapin, D.V., Lee, J., Kovalenko, M.V. & Shevchenko, E.V. (2010). Prospects of colloidal nanocrystals for electronic and optoelectronic applications. Chem Rev 110, 389458.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
White, E.R., Mecklenburg, M., Shevitski, B., Singer, S.B. & Regan, B.C. (2012). Charged nanoparticle dynamics in water induced by scanning transmission electron microscopy. Langmuir 28, 36953698.Google ScholarPubMed
Williamson, M.J., Tromp, R.M., Vereecken, P.M., Hull, R. & Ross, F.M. (2003). Dynamic microscopy of nanoscale cluster growth at the solid-liquid interface. Nature Mater 2, 532536.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Woehl, T.J., Evans, J.E., Arslan, I., Ristenpart, W.D. & Browning, N.D. (2012). Direct in situ determination of the mechanisms controlling nanoparticle nucleation and growth. ACS Nano 6, 85998610.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Woehl, T.J., Jungjohann, K.L., Evans, J.E., Arslan, I., Ristenpart, W.D. & Browning, N.D. (2013). Experimental procedures to mitigate electron beam induced artifacts during in situ fluid imaging of nanomaterials. Ultramicroscopy 127, 5363.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zheng, H., Claridge, S.A., Minor, A.M., Alivisatos, A.P. & Dahmen, U. (2009). Nanocrystal diffusion in a liquid thin film observed by in situ transmission electron microscopy. Nano Lett 9, 24602465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Rudolph Supplementary Material

Supplementary Material

Download Rudolph Supplementary Material(File)
File 160.6 MB