Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-nptnm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-06T16:27:02.717Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A study of two tagging methods in the Caribbean sea cucumber Holothuria mexicana

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 October 2014

Ruber Rodríguez-Barreras ,
Sergio Serrano-Torres  and
Danay Macías-Reyes
Ruber Rodríguez-Barreras*
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, University of Puerto Rico, PO Box 23360 San Juan PR 00931-3360
Sergio Serrano-Torres
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, University of Puerto Rico, PO Box 23360 San Juan PR 00931-3360
Danay Macías-Reyes
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, University of Puerto Rico, PO Box 23360 San Juan PR 00931-3360
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: R. Rodríguez-Barreras, Department of Biology, University of Puerto Rico, PO Box 23360 San Juan PR 00931-3360 email: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

An effective tagging technique represents a challenge for long-term studies in sea cucumbers. These studies require accurate identification, high tag retention and no adverse effects on vital rates or performance of the tagged individuals. We tested the retention rate of one external and one internal tag in the sea cucumber Holothuria mexicana. The passive integrated transponder (PIT) tag was inserted into the coelomic cavity and the T-bar (external tag) was attached in the upper surface of the body wall. Retention rate was lower, for both kinds of invasive tags, than required in long-term studies. Stress elicited by the tagging procedure caused evisceration of 40% of PIT-tagged individuals versus a 57% of T-bars during or no more than five minutes after tagging. No differences in evisceration between both tags were detected; nor any correlation between evisceration and length. To conclude, the tagging procedure harmed the animals and both PIT-tags and T-bars showed similar low retention rates after ten weeks. Both marks were not effective for long-term studies in Holothuria mexicana.

Keywords

passive integrated transponder markstaggingholothuroidHolothuria mexicanaPuerto Rico
Type
Research Article
Information
Marine Biodiversity Records , Volume 7 , 2014 , e118
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agatsuma, Y., Nakata, A. and Matsuyama, K. (2000) Seasonal foraging activity of the sea urchin Strongylocentrotus nudus on coralline flats in Oshoro Bay in south-western Hokkaido. Japan Fisheries Science 66, 198–203. doi: 10.1046/j.1444- 2906.2000.00035.x.Google Scholar
Amstrup, S., MacDonald, L. and Manly, B. (2006) Handbook of capture–recapture analysis. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 296 pp.Google Scholar
Bradbury, A., Palsson, W.A. and Pacunski, R.E. (1996) Stock assessment of the commercial sea cucumber Parastichopus californicus in the San Juan Islands, Washington State, USA. Journal of Shellfish Research 15, 785–786.Google Scholar
Caswell, H. (2001) Matrix population models. 2nd edition. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates, 722 pp.Google Scholar
Cieciel, K., Pyper, B.J. and Eckert, G.L. (2009) Tag retention and effects of tagging on movement of the giant red sea cucumber Parastichopus californicus. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 29, 288–294. doi: 10.1577/M07- 194.1.Google Scholar
Conand, C. (1990) The fishery resources of Pacific island countries. Pt. 2: Holothurians. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper, 272.2. Rome: FAO.Google Scholar
Conand, C. (1991) Long-term movements and mortality of some tropical sea-cucumbers monitored by tagging and recapture. In Yanagisawa, T., Yasumasu, I., Ogurao, C., Suzuki, N. and Motokawa, T. (eds) Biology of Echinodermata. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: A.A. Balkema, pp. 169–175.Google Scholar
Donaldson, W.E., Schmidt, D., Watson, L. and Pengilly, D. (1992) Development of a technique to tag adult red king crab Paralithodes camtschaticus (Tilesius, 1815), with passive integrated transponder tags. Journal of Shellfish Research 11, 91–94.Google Scholar
Duggan, R.E. and Miller, R.J. (2001) External and internal tags for the green sea urchin. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 258, 115–122.Google Scholar
Ebert, T.A. (2007) Growth and survival of postsettlement sea urchins. In Lawrence, J.M. (ed.) Edible sea urchins: biology and ecology. 2nd edition. Oxford: Elsevier, pp. 95–134.Google Scholar
Gibbons, J.W. and Andrews, K.M. (2004) PIT tagging: simple technology at its best. BioScience 54, 447–454.Google Scholar
Goldman, M. (2007) Migratory behavior of adult female blue crabs, Callinectes sapidus, in Pamlico Sound: implications for assessment and protection of the spawning stock. MSc thesis. Duke University, North Carolina, USA, 39 pp.Google Scholar
Harriot, V.J. (1980) The ecology of holothurian fauna of Heron Reef and Moreton Bay. MSc thesis. University of Queensland, Brisbane, 153 pp.Google Scholar
Hendler, G., Miller, J.E., Pawson, D.L. and Kier, P.M. (1995) Sea stars, sea urchins, and allies: echinoderms of Florida and the Caribbean. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press, 390 pp.Google Scholar
James, D.W. (2000) Diet, movement, and covering behavior of the sea urchin Toxopneustesroseus in rhodolith beds in the Gulf of California, Mexico. Marine Biology 137, 913–923. doi: 10.1007/s002270000423.Google Scholar
Kirshenbaum, S., Feindel, S. and Chen, Y. (2006) A study of tagging methods for the sea cucumber Cucumaria frondosa in the waters off Maine. Fishery Bulletin 104, 299–302.Google Scholar
Lauzon-Guay, J.S. and Scheibling, R.E. (2008) Evaluation of passive integrated transponder (PIT) tags in studies of sea urchins: caution advised. Aquatic Biology 2, 105–112.Google Scholar
Leber, K.M. and Blankenship, H.L. (2011) How advances in tagging technology improved progress in a new science marine stock enhancement. American Fisheries Society Symposium 76, 1–12.Google Scholar
Martínez, A.S., Byrne, M. and Coleman, R.A. (2013) Unique tagging of small echinoderms: a case study using the cushion star Parvulastra exigua . Methods in Ecology and Evolution 4, 993–1000. doi: 10.1111/2041-210X.12099.Google Scholar
Medicci, D.A., Wolcott, T.G. and Wolcott, D.L. (2006) Scale-dependent movements and protection of female blue crabs (Callinectes sapidus). Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 63, 858–871.Google Scholar
Morgan, A.D. (2000) Induction of spawning in the sea cucumber Holothuria scabra (Echinodermata: Holothuroidea). Journal of the World Aquaculture Society 31, 186–194. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-7345.2000.tb00352.x.Google Scholar
Mowat, G. and Strobeck, C. (2000) Estimating population size of grizzly bears using hair capture, DNA profiling, and mark–recapture analysis. Journal of Wildlife Management 64, 183–193.Google Scholar
Navarro, P.G., García-Sanz, S., Barrio, J.M. and Tuya, F. (2013) Feeding and movement patterns of the sea cucumber Holothuria sanctori . Marine Biology 160, 2957–2966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicolaus, M., Bouwman, K.M. and Dingemanse, N.J. (2008) Effect of PIT tags on the survival and recruitment of Great Tits Parus major . Ardea 96, 286–292. doi: 10.5253/078.096.0215.Google Scholar
Olson, M. and Newton, G. (1979) A simple, rapid method for marking individual sea urchins. California Fish and Game 65, 58–62.Google Scholar
Pengilly, D. and Watson, L.J. (1994) Automated detection of internally injected tags in red king crabs at crab processing facilities. Fisheries Research 19, 293–300.Google Scholar
Pollock, K.H., Nichols, J.D., Brownie, C. and Hines, J.E. (1990) Statistical inference for capture–recapture experiments. Wildlife Monographs 107, 1–97.Google Scholar
Prentice, E.F., Flagg, T.A. and McCutcheon, C.S. (1990) Feasibility of using implantable passive integrated transponder (PIT) tags in salmonids. American Fisheries Society Symposium 7, 317–322.Google Scholar
Purcell, S.W. and Simutoga, M. (2008) Spatio-temporal and size-dependent variation in the success of releasing cultured sea cucumbers in the wild. Reviews in Fisheries Science 16, 204–214. doi: 10.1080/10641260701686895.Google Scholar
Purcell, S.W. and Blockmans, B.F. (2009) Effective fluorochrome marking of juvenile sea cucumbers for sea ranching and restocking. Aquaculture 296, 263–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Purcell, S.W., Blockmans, B.F. and Nash, W.J. (2006) Efficacy of chemical markers and physical tags for large-scale release of an exploited holothurians. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 334, 283–293. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2006.02.007.Google Scholar
Purcell, S.W., Agudo, N.S. and Gossuin, H. (2008) Poor retention of passive induced transponder (PIT) tags for mark–recapture studies on tropical sea cucumbers. SPC Beche-de-Mer Information Bulletin 28, 53–55. doi: 10.1080/10641260701686895.Google Scholar
Purcell, S.W., Samyn, Y. and Conand, C. (2012) Commercially important sea cucumbers of the world. FAO Species Catalogue for Fishery Purposes. No. 6. Rome: FAO, 150 pp., 30 colour plates.Google Scholar
R Core Team (2013) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. URL http://www.R-project.org/.Google Scholar
Schooley, R.L., Van Horne, B. and Burnham, K.P. (1993) Passive integrated transponders for marking free-ranging Townsend's ground squirrels. Journal of Mammalogy 74, 480–484.Google Scholar
Shiell, G.L. (2006) Effect of invasive tagging on the activity of Holothuria whitmaei [Echinodermata: Holothuroidea]: a suitable mark–recapture method for short-term field studies of holothurian behaviour. Marine and Freshwater Behaviour and Physiology 32, 153–162. doi: 10.1080/10236240600688789.Google Scholar
Sonnernholzner, J.I., Montaño-Moctezuma, G. and Searcy-Bernal, R. (2010) Effect of three tagging methods on the growth and survival of the purple sea urchin Strongylocentrotus purpuratus . Pan-American Journal of Aquatic Sciences 5, 414–420.Google Scholar
Steyermark, A.C., Williams, K., Spotila, J.R., Paladino, F.V., Rostal, D.C., Morreale, S.J., Koberg, M.T. and Arauz-Vargas, R. (1996) Nesting leatherback turtles at Las Baulas National Park, Costa Rica. Chelonian Conservation and Biology 2, 173–183.Google Scholar
Walker, M.M. (1981) Influence of season on growth of the sea urchin Evechinus chloroticus . New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 15, 201–205. doi: 10.1080/00288330.1981.9515913.Google Scholar
Williams, K., Nichols, J. and Conroy, M. (2002) Analysis and management of animal populations. New York: Academic Press, 1040 pp.Google Scholar
Woods, C.M.C. and James, P.J. (2005) Evaluation of passive integrated transponder tags for individually identifying the sea urchin Evechinus chloroticus (Valenciennes). Aquaculture Research 36, 730–732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zar, J.H. (2010) Biostatistical analysis. 5th edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 944 pp.Google Scholar