Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xfwgj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-07T14:05:27.789Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Factors influencing tropical lizard reproduction vary by microhabitat but not forest type

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 August 2023

Meredith C. Swartwout Open the ORCID record for Meredith C. Swartwout [Opens in a new window]  and
J. D. Willson
Meredith C. Swartwout*
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, USA Arkansas Game and Fish Commission, Little Rock, AR, USA
J. D. Willson
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, USA
*
Corresponding author: Meredith C. Swartwout; Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

To understand mechanisms behind enigmatic declines of tropical reptiles, knowledge of species interactions and how they vary over space and time is important. Some tropical lizard population dynamics can be highly influenced by egg survival. Yet relatively few studies have examined relationships between lizard reproductive success and egg predators across forest and microhabitat types. In this study, we examined variation in probability of egg depredation, predatory ant abundance, prey availability, and the number of lizards and eggs encountered across four different forest types (abandoned agroforestry, abandoned plantation, secondary forest, and old-growth forest) and three microhabitats (buttress, fallen log, and leaf-litter) at La Selva Biological Station, Costa Rica. Based on previous studies, we made three hypotheses about how lizard egg abundance, egg survival, and predatory ant numbers would be related across microhabitat and forest type. Of these hypotheses, only one was supported: we found more lizard eggs in buttress and fallen log microhabitats than leaf-litter. We did not observe any differences in lizard reproduction or numbers of invertebrates by forest type alone. Based on patterns observed in this study, we suggest that future studies investigating tropical leaf-litter lizard declines focus on environmental variation at the microhabitat scale.

Keywords

AnolisantsLa Selvaleaf-litterlizard eggsmicrohabitatdepredation
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Tropical Ecology , Volume 39 , 2024 , e32
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Al-Kaisi, M (2000) How to evaluate soil moisture in the field. Integrated Crop Management News 2091, 51.Google Scholar
Andrews, RM (1979) Evolution of life histories: a comparison of Anolis lizards from matched island and mainland habitats. Breviora 454, 1–51.Google Scholar
Andrews, RM (1982) Spatial variation in egg mortality of the lizard Anolis limifrons . Herpetologica 38, 165–171.Google Scholar
Andrews, RM (1988) Demographic correlates of variable egg survival for a tropical lizard. Oecologia 76, 376–382.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Andrews, R and Rand, AS (1974) Reproductive effort in anoline lizards. Ecology 55, 1317–1327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrews, RM and Wright, SJ (1994) Long-term population fluctuations of a tropical lizard: a test of causality. In Vitt, LJ and Pianka, ER (eds), Lizard Ecology: Historical and Experimental Perspectives. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 337–360.Google Scholar
Bates, D, Machler, M, Bolker, B and Walker, S (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67, 1–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, KE and Donnelly, MA (2006) Influence of forest fragmentation on community structure of frogs and lizards in northeastern Costa Rica. Conservation Biology 20, 1750–1760.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ben-Shachar, MS, Lüdecke, D and Makowski, D (2020) effectsize: estimation of effect size indices and standardized parameters. Journal of Open Source Software 5, 2815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bestelmeyer, BT, Agosti, D, Alonso, LE, Brandão, CRF, Brown, WL Jr, Delabie, JHC and Silvestre, R (2000) Field techniques for the study of ground-dwelling ants. In Agosti, D, Majer, JD, Alonso, LE and Schultz, TR (eds), Ants: Standard Methods for Measuring and Monitoring Biodiversity. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press, pp. 122–144.Google Scholar
Blois, JL, Zarnetske, PL, Fitzpatrick, MC and Finnegan, S (2013) Climate change and the past, present, and future of biotic interactions. Science 341, 499–504.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chalcraft, DR and Andrews, RM (1999) Predation on lizard eggs by ants: species interactions in a variable physical environment. Oecologia 119, 285–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, KR (1993) Non-parametric multivariate analyses of changes in community structure. Austral Ecology 18, 117–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corn, MJ (1981) Ecological separation of Anolis lizards in a Costa Rican rain forest. PhD Dissertation, University of Florida, Gainesville.Google Scholar
DeSana, A, Fargevieille, A and Warner, DA (2020) Survival of lizard eggs varies with microhabitat in the presence of an invertebrate nest predator. Evolutionary Ecology 34, 483–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doan, TM (2003) Which methods are most effective for surveying rain forest herpetofauna? Journal of Herpetology 37, 72–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Field, A (2013) Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics, 4th Edn. London: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
Fisher, R and Ineich, I (2012) Cryptic extinction of a common Pacific lizard Emoia impar (Squamata, Scincidae) from the Hawaiian Islands. Oryx 46, 187–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitch, HS (1973) Population structure and survivorship in some Costa Rican lizards. Occasional Papers of the Museum of Natural History 1973, 1–41.Google Scholar
Folt, B (2017) Population regulation of frogs and lizards in a lowland wet neotropical forest: integrating alternative hypotheses. PhD Dissertation, Auburn University, Auburn.Google Scholar
Folt, B and Reider, KE (2013) Leaf-litter herpetofaunal richness, abundance, and community assembly in mono-dominant plantations and primary forest of northeastern Costa Rica. Biodiversity and Conservation 22, 2057–2070.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, J and Weisberg, S (2019) An R Companion to Applied Regression, 3rd Edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Available at: https://socialsciences.mcmaster.ca/jfox/Books/Companion/.Google Scholar
Guyer, C (1988a) Food supplementation in a tropical mainland anole, Norops humilis: effects on individuals. Ecology 69, 362–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyer, C (1988b) Food supplementation in a tropical mainland anole, Norops humilis: demographic effects. Ecology 69, 350–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, AJ, Neilson, RP, Dale, VH, Flather, CH, Iverson, LR, Currie, DJ, Shafer, S, Cook, R and Bartlein, PJ (2001) Global changes in forests: responses of species, communities, and biomes: interactions between climate change and land use are projected to cause large shifts in biodiversity. BioScience 51, 765–779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartshorn, GS and Hammel, BE (1994) Vegetation types and floristic patterns. In McDade, LA, Bawa, KS, Hespenheide, HA and Hartshorn, GS (eds), La Selva: Ecology and Natural History of a Neotropical Rainforest. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, pp. 73–89.Google Scholar
Hawkins, SJ, Moore, PJ, Burrows, MT, Poloczanska, E, Mieszkowska, N, Herbert, RJH, Jenkins, SR, Thompson, RC, Genner, MJ and Southward, AJ (2008) Complex interactions in a rapidly changing world: responses of rocky shore communities to recent climate change. Climate Research 37, 123–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heinen, JT (1992) Comparisons of the leaf litter herpetofauna in abandoned cacao plantations and primary rain forest in Costa Rica: some implications for faunal restoration. Biotropica 24, 431–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higgins, EA, Boyd, DS, Brown, TW, Owen, SC and Algar, AC (2021) Disentangling controls on animal abundance: prey availability, thermal habitat, and microhabitat structure. Ecology and Evolution 11, 11414–11424.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hill, JK and Hamer, KC (2004) Determining impacts of habitat modification on diversity of tropical forest fauna: the importance of spatial scale. Journal of Applied Ecology 41, 744–754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, W (2008) Resources exploitation by ants facilitates lizard egg survival. Ecological Entomology 33, 555–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, R, Jones, K and Manley, D (2018) Confounding and collinearity in regression analysis: a cautionary tale and an alternative procedure, illustrated by studies of British voting behavior. Quality & Quantity 52, 1957–1976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Köhler, G and Sunyer, J (2008) Two new species of anoles formerly referred to as Anolis limifrons (Squamata: Polychrotidae). Herpetologica 64, 92–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lemmon, PE (1956) A spherical densiometer for estimating forest overstory density. Forest Science 2, 314–320.Google Scholar
Lenth, R (2023) emmeans: Estimated Marginal Means, aka Least-squares Means. R package version 1.8.4-1. Available at: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=emmeans.Google Scholar
Lieberman, SS (1986) Ecology of the leaf-litter herpetofauna of a neotropical rainforest: La Selva, Costa Rica. Acta Zoologica Mexicana (ns) 13, 1–72.Google Scholar
Lister, BC and Garcia, A (2018) Climate-driven declines in arthropod abundance restructure a rainforest food web. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115, E10397–E10406.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lüdecke, D, Ben-Shachar, MS, Patil, I, Waggoner, P and Makowski, D (2021) performance: an R package for assessment, comparison and testing of statistical models. Journal of Open Source Software 6, 3139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lüdecke, D, Makowski, D, Waggoner, P and Ben-Shachar, MS (2020) See: Visualisation Toolbox for ‘easystats’ and Extra Geoms, Themes and Color Palettes for ‘ggplot2’. R package version 0.4.1. Available at: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=see.Google Scholar
Manning, AD, Cunningham, RB and Lindenmayer, DB (2013) Bringing forward the benefits of coarse woody debris in ecosystem recovery under different levels of grazing and vegetation density. Biological Conservation 157, 204–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martinez Arbizu, P (2017) pairwiseAdonis: Pairwise Multilevel Comparison using Adonis. R package version 0.4.Google Scholar
Mazerolle, MJ (2020) AICcmodavg: Model Selection and Multimodel Inference Based on (Q)AIC(c). R package version 2.3-1. Available at: https://cran.r-project.org/package=AICcmodavg.Google Scholar
McGlynn, TP, Fawcett, RM and Clark, DA (2009) Litter biomass and nutrient determinants of ant density, nest size, and growth in a Costa Rican tropical wet forest. Biotropica 41, 234–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newman, JC, Thawley, CJ and Langkilde, T (2014) Red imported fire ant predation on eggs of the eastern fence lizard. Herpetology Notes 7, 415–418.Google Scholar
Oksanen, J (2007) Multivariate Analyses of Ecological Communities in R: Vegan Tutorial. Available at: http://cc.oulu.fi/∼jarioksa/opetus/metodi/vegantutor.pdf.Google Scholar
Oksanen, J, Blanchet, FG, Friendly, M, Kindt, R, Legendre, P, McGlinn, D, Minchin, PR, O’Hara, RB, Simpson, GL, Solymos, P, Stevens, MHH, Szoecs, E and Wagner, H (2020) vegan: Community Ecology Package. R package version 2.5-7. Available at: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan.Google Scholar
Peters, G (2018) Userfriendlyscience: Quantitative Analysis Made Accessible. R package version 0.7.2. Available at: https://userfriendlyscience.com. DOI: 10.17605/osf.io/txequ.Google Scholar
Peters, WCH (1863) Über einige neue Arten der Saurier-Gattung Anolis. Monatsberichte der Königlich presussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin 1863, 135–149.Google Scholar
R Core Team (2022) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available at: https://www.R-project.org/.Google Scholar
Schlaepfer, MA (2003) Successful lizard eggs in a human-disturbed habitat. Oecologia 137, 304–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Socci, AM, Schlaepfer, MA and Gavin, TA (2005) The importance of soil moisture and leaf cover in a female lizard’s (Norops polylepis) evaluation of potential oviposition sites. Herpetologica 61, 233–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stapley, J, Garcia, M and Andrews, RM (2015) Long-term data reveal a population decline of the tropical lizard Anolis apletophallus, and a negative affect of El Nino years on population growth rate. PLoS ONE 10, e0115450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Talbot, JJ (1979) Time budget, niche overlap, inter- and intraspecific aggression in Anolis humilis and Anolis limifrons from Costa Rica. Copeia 1979, 472–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogel, P (1983) On an ant–lizard interaction. Oecologia 58, 269–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitfield, SM, Bell, KE, Philippi, T, Sasa, M, Bolaños, F, Chaves, G, Savage, JM and Donnelly, MA (2007) Amphibian and reptile declines over 35 years at La Selva, Costa Rica. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104, 8352–8356.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whitfield, SM and Pierce, MSF (2005) Tree buttress microhabitat use by a neotropical leaf-litter herpetofauna. Journal of Herpetology 39, 192–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitfield, SM, Reider, K, Greenspan, S and Donnelly, MA (2014) Litter dynamics regulate population densities in a declining terrestrial herpetofauna. Copeia 14, 454–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wickham, H (2016) Ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. New York: Springer-Verlag. Available at: https://ggplot2.tidyverse.org.3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar