Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2xdlg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-07T10:34:07.372Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Size compositions and reproductive biology of an important bycatch shark species (Heterodontus portusjacksoni) in south-western Australian waters

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2008

Ashlee A. Jones ,
Norman G. Hall  and
Ian C. Potter
Ashlee A. Jones*
Affiliation:
Centre for Fish and Fisheries Research, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Western Australia, 6150, Australia
Norman G. Hall
Affiliation:
Centre for Fish and Fisheries Research, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Western Australia, 6150, Australia
Ian C. Potter
Affiliation:
Centre for Fish and Fisheries Research, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Western Australia, 6150, Australia
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: Ashlee A. JonesCentre for Fish and Fisheries Research Murdoch UniversityMurdoch Western Australia 6150Australia email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Heterodontus portusjacksoni was obtained from the catches of commercial trawl, gillnet and longline fisheries operating in south-western Australian waters, in which this shark is an abundant bycatch species. Ninety per cent of the H. portusjacksoni caught by commercial trawling in a marine embayment were <400 mm in total length, whereas 99 and 100%, respectively, of the individuals taken by commercial gillnet and longline outside that embayment were >400 mm. Although the differences between the size compositions in the catches obtained by trawling vs both gillnetting and longlining, which were similar, are partly attributable to gear selectivity, they also reflect a use by juvenile H. portusjacksoni of protected nearshore waters as nursery areas and a tendency for larger juveniles and adults to occupy reef/rock habitats in a range of water depths. The fact that all but one of the numerous H. portusjacksoni >800 mm were females is reflected in the ratio of females to males differing significantly from parity in the gillnet and longline samples. Yolked oocytes usually take one year to develop to ovulatory size. Ovulation occurs in late winter to early summer and hatching takes place a year later when the embryo is 180–220 mm. The claspers of males commence rapid growth at a total length of ~450 mm, coincident with the onset of clasper calcification and gonadal maturation. The rate of clasper growth relative to total length reached a maximum at ~570 mm and then declined precipitously as the claspers approached full calcification. Based on gonadal criteria, the L50 at maturity for females (805 mm) was nearly 40% greater than that for males (593 mm). Values of the deviance information criterion and marked overlap in their 95% confidence intervals demonstrate that the L50 of 581 mm derived for males using full clasper calcification as the index of maturity was equally valid as the above L50 derived for males at maturity using gonadal criteria. The capture of substantial numbers of juveniles by trawling and of females <L50 at maturity by gillnetting and longlining may be having localized effects on the population structure of H. portusjacksoni in south-western Australian waters.

Keywords

Port Jackson sharkhabitatsovulationsex-ratiossize at maturityclasper growth
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 88 , Issue 1 , February 2008 , pp. 189 - 197
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Burnham, K.P. and Anderson, D.R. (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information–theoretic approach, 2nd edn. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Chen, W.K. and Liu, K.M. (2006) Reproductive biology of whitespotted bamboo shark Chiloscyllium plagiosum in northern waters off Taiwan. Fisheries Science 72, 1215–1224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Compagno, L.J.V. (2001) FAO Species Catalogue for Fisheries Purposes. Sharks of the World. An annotated and illustrated catalogue of shark species known to date. Vol. 2. Bullhead, mackerel and carpet sharks (Heterodontiformes, Lamniformes and Orectolobiformes). Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.Google Scholar
Compagno, L.J.V., Dando, M. and Fowler, S. (2005) A field guide to sharks of the world. London: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Cortés, E. (2000) Life history patterns and correlations in sharks. Reviews in Fisheries Science 8, 299–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costa, M.E., Erzini, K. and Borges, T.C. (2005) Reproductive biology of the blackmouth catshark, Galeus melastomus (Chondrichthyes: Scyliorhinidae) off the south coast of Portugal. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 85, 1173–1183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ebert, D.A., Compagno, L.J.V. and Cowley, P.D. (2006) Reproductive biology of catsharks (Chondrichthyes: Scyliorhinidae) off the west coast of southern Africa. ICES Journal of Marine Science 63, 1053–1065.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, J.R. and Shackley, S.E. (1997) The reproductive biology of Scyliorhinus canicula in the Bristol Channel, U.K. Journal of Fish Biology 51, 361–372.Google Scholar
Ellis, J.R., Dulvey, N.K., Jennings, S., Parker-Humphreys, M. and Rogers, S.I. (2005) Assessing the status of demersal elasmobranchs in UK waters: a review. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 85, 1025–1047.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchins, B. and Swainston, R. (1986) Sea fishes of Southern Australia. East Perth: Swainston Publishing.Google Scholar
Ihaka, R. and Gentleman, R. (1996) R: A language for data analysis and graphics. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 5, 299–314.Google Scholar
Jones, A.A., White, W.T. and Potter, I.C. (2005) A hermaphroditic Port Jackson shark Heterodontus portusjacksoni, with complete and separate female and male reproductive tracts. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 85, 1171–1172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Last, P.R. and Stevens, J.D. (1994) Sharks and rays of Australia. Australia: CSIRO.Google Scholar
Lunn, D.J., Thomas, A., Best, N.G. and Spiegelhalter, D.J. (2000) WinBUGS—a Bayesian modelling framework: concepts, structure and extensibility. Statistics and Computing 10, 321–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, L.J., White, W.T. and Potter, I.C. (2007) Reproductive biology and diet of the southern fiddler ray, Trygonorrhina fasciata (Batoidea: Rhinobatidae), an important trawl bycatch species. Marine and Freshwater Research 58, 104–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAuley, R. and Simpfendorfer, C. (2003) Catch composition of the WA temperate demersal gillnet and demersal longline fisheries, 1994 to 1999. Fisheries Research Report, Department of Fisheries, Western Australia, no. 146, 78 pp.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, R.H. and O'Gower, A.K. (1971) Life history and underwater studies of a heterodontid shark. Ecological Monographs 41, 271–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Musick, J.A. (2004) Introduction: Management of sharks and their relatives (Elasmobranchii). In Musick, J.A. and Bonfil, R. (eds) Elasmobranch fisheries management techniques. Singapore: APEC Fisheries Working Group, Asia–Pacific Economic Cooperation, pp. 1–6.Google Scholar
Musick, J.A. and Ellis, J.K. (2005) Reproductive evolution of chondrichthyans. In Hamlett, W.C. (ed.) Reproductive Biology and Phylogeny of Chondrichthyans. Vol. 3. Endfield, USA: Science Publishers, pp. 45–79.Google Scholar
Nelson, D.R. and Johnson, R.H. (1970) Diel activity rhythms in the nocturnal, bottom-dwelling sharks, Heterodontus francisci and Cephaloscyllium ventriosum. Copeia 1970, 732–739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Gower, A.K. (1995) Speculations on spatial memory for the Port Jackson shark (Heterodontus portusjacksoni) (Meyer) (Heterodontidae). Marine and Freshwater Research 46, 861–871.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raftery, A.L. and Lewis, S. (1992) How many iterations in the Gibbs sampler? In Bernardo, J.M. et al. (eds) Bayesian Statistics 4. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 763–773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, A.J., Maharaj, G., Compagno, L.J.V., Leslie, R.W., Ebert, D.A. and Gibbons, M.J. (2000) Abundance, distribution, morphometrics, reproduction and diet of the Izak catshark. Journal of Fish Biology 56, 552–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodda, K.R. (2000) Development in the Port Jackson shark embryo. PhD thesis, University of Adelaide, Australia.Google Scholar
Smith, R.M., Walker, T.I. and Hamlett, W.C. (2004) Microscopic organisation of the oviducal gland of the holocephalan elephant fish, Callorhynchus milii. Marine and Freshwater Research 55, 155–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, B.J. (2005) Bayesian Output Analysis Program (BOA), Version 1.1.5 [online]. The University of Iowa. Available from http://www.public-health.uiowa.edu/boa [accessed 23 June, 2006].Google Scholar
Spiegelhalter, D.J., Best, N.G., Carlin, B.P. and Van der Linde, A. (2002) Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit (with discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 64, 583–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevens, J.D., Bonfil, R., Dulvy, N.K. and Walker, P.A. (2000) The effects of fishing on sharks, rays, and chimaeras (chondrichthyans), and the implications for marine ecosystems. ICES Journal of Marine Science 57, 476–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stobutzki, I.C., Miller, M.J., Heales, D.S. and Brewer, D.T. (2002) Sustainability of elasmobranchs caught as bycatch in a tropical prawn (shrimp) trawl fishery. Fisheries Bulletin 100, 800–821.Google Scholar
Tovar-Avila, J. (2006) Reproduction, age validation, growth determination and effects of fishing on the Port Jackson shark (Heterodontus portusjacksoni) in south-eastern Australia. PhD Thesis, University of Melbourne, Australia.Google Scholar
Walker, T.I. (2005) Reproduction in fisheries science. In Hamlett, W.C. (ed.) Reproductive biology and phylogeny of chondrichthyes: sharks, rays and chimaeras, Vol. 3. Endfield, USA: Science Publishers, pp. 45–79.Google Scholar
White, W.T., Platell, M.E. and Potter, I.C. (2001) Relationship between reproductive biology and age composition and growth in Urolophus lobatus (Batoidea: Urolophidae). Marine Biology 138, 135–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wourms, J.P. (1977) Reproduction and development in chondrichthyan fishes. American Zoology 21, 473–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar