Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T13:21:21.006Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Increased fracture toughness in nanoporous silica–polyimide matrix composites

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Shiling Ruan
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210
John J. Lannutti
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210
Stan Prybyla
Affiliation:
BFGoodrich Aerospace Research and Development Center, 9921 Brecksville Rd., Brecksville, Ohio 44141–3289
Robert R. Seghi
Affiliation:
College of Dentistry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210
Get access

Abstract

Silica–polyimide nanocomposites were prepared by hot-pressing mixtures of polyimide and highly porous silica powder. The silica powder was produced using a sol-gel process that generates pores as small as 15 Å. The effects of loading, cure, and post-cure temperature on fracture toughness were investigated. The addition of silica particles improved the fracture toughness from 0.5 to a maximum of 1.9 MPa m0.5. However, fracture toughness dropped at silica weight percentages ≥30%. The cure and post-curing temperatures have a strong influence on toughness; post-curing exposure ≥400 °C reduced toughness. Transmission electron microscopy examination of the fracture surfaces indicated that the toughness improvements may occur at the nanometer scale due to crack pinning and branching induced by the nanoporous silica particles.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Gleiter, H., Adv. Mater. 4, 474 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Gleiter, H., Nanostruct. Mater. 1, 1 (1992).Google Scholar
3.Siegel, R.W., Nanostruct Mater. 3, 1 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Digani, R., Chem. Eng. News 72, 18 (1992).Google Scholar
5.Gonsalves, K.E. and Chen, X., in The polymeric materials encyclopedia: synthesis, properties and applications, the polymer science and technology series, edited by Salamone, J.C. (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1996).Google Scholar
6.Becze, C.E. and Xu, G., J. Mater. Res. 12, 566 (1997).Google Scholar
7.Messersmith, P.B., Osenar, P., and Stupp, S.I., J. Mater. Res. 14, 315 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Chen, G. and Qi, Z., J. Mater. Res. 15, 351 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Luo, J., Lannutti, J.J., and Seghi, R.R., J. Dent. Res. 76, 2455 (1997).Google Scholar
10.Luo, J., Lannutti, J.J., and Seghi, R.R., J. Dent. Res. 76, 1967 (1997).Google Scholar
11.Luo, J., Lannutti, J.J., and Seghi, R.R., Mater. Sci. Eng. C 5, 15 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Kaas, R.L. and Kardos, J.L., Polym. Eng. Sci. 11, 11 (1971).Google Scholar
13.Leyden, E.J., Silanes, Surfaces and Interface (Gordon and Breach, New York, 1985).Google Scholar
14.Luo, J. and Lannutti, J.J., Dent. Mater. 14, 29 (1998).Google Scholar
15.Zhu, Z.K., Yang, Y., Yin, J., and Qi, Z.N., J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 73, 2977 (1999).Google Scholar
16.Mascia, L., Zhang, Z., and Shaw, S.J., Composites, Part A 27, 1221 (1996).Google Scholar
17.Chen, Y. and Iroh, J.O., Chem. Mater. 11, 1218 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Iyoku, Y., Kakimoto, M., and Imai, Y., J. Mater. Chem. 2, 679 (1992).Google Scholar
19.Prybyla, S., SuperImide™ 800 Resin and Composites: Neat resin performance, thermo-oxidative stability and hygrothermal stability, High Temple Workshop XIX (Adam’s Mark Hotel, Denver, Colorado, February 1–4, 1999).Google Scholar
20.Ou, Y., Yang, F., Yu, Z., J. Polym. Sci., Part B: Polym. Phys. 36, 789 (1998).Google Scholar
21.Yang, F. and Ou, Y., J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 69, 355 (1998).3.0.CO;2-V>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22.Morgan, R.J., Jurek, R.J., Larive, D.E., Tung, C.M., and Donnelan, T., Adv. Chem. Ser. 233 (Toughened Plastics I), 493 (1993).Google Scholar
23.White, S.R. and Hahn, H.T., J. Compos. Mater. 27, 1352 (1993).Google Scholar
24.Nawaz, G.M., in Fractography Of Modern Engineering Materials: Composite Materials: Composites And Metals, ASTM STP 948, edited by Masters, J.E. and Au, J.J. (American Society of Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA, 1987), Vol. 177.Google Scholar