Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gvh9x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T15:23:46.407Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Wolfgang U. Dressler & F. V. Mareš (eds), Phonologica 1972: Akten der zweiten internationalen Phonologie-Tagung, Wien, 5–8 September 1972. München& D. (1964). Syllable quantity and enclitics in English.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Roger Lass
Roger Lass
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, University of Edinburgh.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 12 , Issue 2 , September 1976 , pp. 346 - 358
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abercrombie, D. (1964). Syllable quantity and enclitics in English. In Abercrombie, D.et al. (eds), In honour of Daniel Jones: papers contributed on the occasion of his eightieth birthday, 12 September 1961. 216–222. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Anttila, R. (1974). Formalisation as degeneration in historical linguistics. In Anderson, & Jones, C. (eds), Historical linguistics, 1. 1–32. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Anttila, R. (1975). Was there a generative historical linguistics? In Dahlstedt, K-H. (ed.), The Nordic languages and modern linguistics, 2. 70–92. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. & Halle, M. (1968). The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Ewert, A. (1933). The French language. London: Faber.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R., Fant, C. G. M. & Halle, M. (1951. Preliminaries to speech analysis. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
King, R. D. (1969). Historical linguistics and generative grammar. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, P. (1968). How abstract is phonology? Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, P. (1971). Historical linguistics. In Dingwall, W. O. (ed.), A survey of linguistic science. 576–649. College Park: University of Maryland.Google Scholar
Labov, W., Yeager, M. & Steiner, R. (1972). A quantitative study of sound change in progress. Philadelphia: U.S. Regional Survey.Google Scholar
Lass, R. (1969). On the derivative status of phonological rules: the function of metarules in sound change. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Lass, R. (1974). Linguistic orthogenesis? Scots vowel quantity and the English length conspiracy. In Anderson, J. M. & Jones, C. (eds), Historical linguistics II. 311–352. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Lass, R. (forthcoming). English phonology and phonological theory: synchronic and diachronic studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lass, R. & Anderson, J. M. (1974). Old English phonology. (Cambridge studies in linguistics 14.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Linell, P. (1974). Problems of psychological reality in generative phonology. RUUL (Reports from Uppsala University Department of Linguistics) 4. Uppsala: Uppsala University, Department of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Popper, K. R. (1968). Conjectures and refutations: the growth of scientific knowledge. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Skousen, R. (1973). Evidence in phonology. In Kisseberth, C. (ed), Studies in generative phonology, 72–103. Champaign, Ill.: Linguistic Research, Inc.Google Scholar
Taylor, J. E. (1972). Is local ordering necessary? Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Trager, G. & Smith, H. L. (1951). An outline of English structure. Washington: American Council of Learned Societies.Google Scholar
Vachek, J. (1964). On peripheral phonemes of Modern English. BSE 4. 7–100.Google Scholar
Zwicky, A. (1974 a). Taking a false step. Lg 50. 215–224.Google Scholar
Zwicky, A. (1974 b). Homing in: on arguing for remote representations. JL 10. 55–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar