Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-jwnkl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-09T07:12:51.839Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Do Mutual Fund Investors Overweight the Probability of Extreme Payoffs in the Return Distribution?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 October 2018

Abstract

We investigate the role of extreme positive payoffs in the distribution of monthly fund returns in investors’ mutual fund preferences. We document a positive and significant relationship between the maximum style-adjusted monthly return (MAX) and future fund flows. The relationship is robust to controlling for average performance, volatility, skewness, and various other fund characteristics. Our findings are consistent with the notion that fund investors overweight the probability of high payoff states in the past return distribution. We further show that MAX is not a useful predictor of future performance and that an increase in a fund’s visibility does not explain our findings.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Michael G. Foster School of Business, University of Washington 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

We thank Jennifer Conrad (the editor) and Florian Weigert (the referee) for their excellent comments that greatly improved the article. We also thank Will Armstrong, John Chalmers, Mathijs Cosemans, Diane Del Guercio, Ro Gutierrez, Yigitcan Karabulut, Paul Koch, Felix Meschke, and seminar participants at Rotterdam School of Management, Norwegian School of Economics, Ozyegin University, and the University of Kansas for helpful comments. Any errors are our own. An earlier version of this article was circulated under the title “Extreme Daily Returns and Fund Flows.”

References

Agarwal, V.; Gay, G. D.; and Ling, L.. “Window Dressing in Mutual Funds.” Review of Financial Studies, 27 (2014), 31333170.Google Scholar
Albuquerque, R.Skewness in Stock Returns: Reconciling the Evidence on Firm Versus Aggregate Returns.” Review of Financial Studies, 25 (2012), 16301673.Google Scholar
Armstrong, W. J.; Genc, E.; and Verbeek, M.. “Going for Gold: An Analysis of Morningstar Analyst Ratings.” Management Science, 65 (2017), 23102327.Google Scholar
Astebro, T.; Mata, J.; and Santos-Pinto, L.. “Preference for Skew in Lotteries: Evidence from the Laboratory.” Working Paper, HEC Paris, (2009).Google Scholar
Bailey, W.; Kumar, A.; and Ng, D.. “Behavioral Biases of Mutual Fund Investors.” Journal of Financial Economics, 102 (2011), 127.Google Scholar
Bali, T. G.; Brown, S.; and Caglayan, M. O.. “Upside Potential of Hedge Funds as a Predictor of Future Performance.” Working Paper, American Finance Association (2017).Google Scholar
Bali, T. G.; Cakici, N.; and Whitelaw, R. F.. “Maxing Out: Stocks as Lotteries and the Cross-Section of Expected Returns.” Journal of Financial Economics, 99 (2011), 427446.Google Scholar
Barber, B. M., and Odean, T.. “All That Glitters: The Effect of Attention and News on the Buying Behavior of Individual and Institutional Investors.” Review of Financial Studies, 21 (2008), 785818.Google Scholar
Barber, B. M.; Odean, T.; and Zheng, L.. “Out of Sight, Out of Mind: The Effects of Expenses on Mutual Fund Flows.” Journal of Business, 78 (2005), 20952120.Google Scholar
Barberis, N.The Psychology of Tail Events: Progress and Challenges.” American Economic Review, 103 (2013), 611616.Google Scholar
Barberis, N., and Huang, M.. “Stocks as Lotteries: The Implications of Probability Weighting for Security Prices.” American Economic Review, 98 (2008), 20662100.Google Scholar
Barberis, N., and Shleifer, A.. “Style Investing.” Journal of Financial Economics, 68 (2003), 161199.Google Scholar
Bergstresser, D., and Poterba, J.. “Do After-Tax Returns Affect Mutual Fund Inflows?Journal of Financial Economics, 63 (2002), 381414.Google Scholar
Blake, C. R., and Morey, M. R.. “Morningstar Ratings and Mutual Fund Performance.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 35 (2000), 451483.Google Scholar
Blume, M. E.An Anatomy of Morningstar Ratings.” Financial Analysts Journal, 54 (1998), 1927.Google Scholar
Boyer, B.; Mitton, T.; and Vorkink, K.. “Expected Idiosyncratic Skewness.” Review of Financial Studies, 23 (2009), 169202.Google Scholar
Boyer, B., and Vorkink, K.. “Stock Options as Lotteries.” Journal of Finance, 69 (2014), 14851527.Google Scholar
Brown, K. C.; Harlow, W. V.; and Starks, L. T.. “Of Tournaments and Temptations: An Analysis of Managerial Incentives in the Mutual Fund Industry.” Journal of Finance, 51 (1996), 85110.Google Scholar
Brunnermeier, M. K.; Gollier, C.; and Parker, J. A.. “Optimal Beliefs, Asset Prices, and the Preference for Skewed Returns.” American Economic Review, 97 (2007), 159165.Google Scholar
Carhart, M. M.On Persistence in Mutual Fund Performance.” Journal of Finance, 52 (1997), 5782.Google Scholar
Chen, J.; Hanson, S.; Hong, H.; and Stein, J. C.. “Do Hedge Funds Profit from Mutual-Fund Distress?” Working Paper, Harvard University (2008).Google Scholar
Chevalier, J., and Ellison, G.. “Risk Taking by Mutual Funds as a Response to Incentives.” Journal of Political Economy, 105 (1997), 11671200.Google Scholar
Clifford, C.; Fulkerson, J.; Jordan, B. D.; and Waldman, S.. “Risk and Fund Flows.” Working Paper, University of Kentucky (2013).Google Scholar
Clifford, C.; Jordan, B. D.; and Riley, T. B.. “Average Funds versus Average Dollars: Implications for Mutual Fund Research.” Journal of Empirical Finance, 28 (2014), 249260.Google Scholar
Conrad, J.; Dittmar, R. F.; and Ghysels, E.. “Ex Ante Skewness and Expected Stock Returns.” Journal of Finance, 68 (2013), 85124.Google Scholar
Cooper, M. J.; Gulen, H.; and Rau, P. R.. “Changing Names with Style: Mutual Fund Name Changes and Their Effects on Fund Flows.” Journal of Finance, 60 (2005), 28252858.Google Scholar
Coval, J., and Stafford, E.. “Asset Fire Sales (and Purchases) in Equity Markets.” Journal of Financial Economics, 86 (2007), 479512.Google Scholar
Cremers, K. J. M., and Petajisto, A.. “How Active Is Your Fund Manager? A New Measure That Predicts Performance.” Review of Financial Studies, 22 (2009), 33293365.Google Scholar
Da, Z.; Engelberg, J.; and Gao, P.. “In Search of Attention.” Journal of Finance, 66 (2011), 14611499.Google Scholar
Da, Z.; Engelberg, J.; and Gao, P.. “The Sum of All FEARS Investor Sentiment and Asset Prices.” Review of Financial Studies, 28 (2015), 132.Google Scholar
Del Guercio, D., and Tkac, P. A.. “Star Power: The Effect of Morningstar Ratings on Mutual Fund Flow.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 43 (2008), 907936.Google Scholar
Duffee, G.Stock Returns and Volatility a Firm-Level Analysis.” Journal of Financial Economics, 37 (1995), 399420.Google Scholar
Elton, E. J.; Gruber, M. J.; and Blake, C. R.. “A First Look at the Accuracy of the CRSP Mutual Fund Database and a Comparison of the CRSP and Morningstar Mutual Fund Databases.” Journal of Finance, 56 (2001), 24152430.Google Scholar
Eraker, B., and Ready, M.. “Do Investors Overpay for Stocks with Lottery-Like Payoffs? An Examination of the Returns of OTC Stocks.” Journal of Financial Economics, 115 (2015), 486504.Google Scholar
Evans, R. B.Mutual Fund Incubation.” Journal of Finance, 65 (2010), 15811611.Google Scholar
Fama, E. F., and French, K. R.. “Common Risk Factors in the Returns on Stocks and Bonds.” Journal of Financial Economics, 33 (1993), 356.Google Scholar
Fama, E. F., and MacBeth, J. D.. “Risk, Return, and Equilibrium: Empirical Tests.” Journal of Political Economy, 81 (1973), 607636.Google Scholar
Ferson, W., and Mo, H.. “Performance Measurement with Selectivity, Market and Volatility Timing.” Journal of Financial Economics, 121 (2016), 93110.Google Scholar
Ferson, W., and Schadt, R. W.. “Measuring Fund Strategy and Performance in Changing Economic Conditions.” Journal of Finance, 51 (1996), 425461.Google Scholar
Finke, C., and Weigert, F.. “Does Foreign Information Predict the Returns of Multinational Firms Worldwide?Review of Finance, 21 (2017), 21992248.Google Scholar
Gallaher, S.; Kaniel, R.; and Starks, L.. “Advertising and Mutual Funds: From Families to Individual Funds.” Working Paper, University of Texas (2015).Google Scholar
Gaspar, J. M.; Massa, M.; and Matos, P.. “Favoritism in Mutual Fund Families? Evidence on Strategic Cross-Fund Subsidization.” Journal of Finance, 61 (2006), 73104.Google Scholar
Gervais, S.; Kaniel, R.; and Mingelgrin, D. H.. “The High-Volume Return Premium.” Journal of Finance, 56 (2001), 877919.Google Scholar
Gil-Bazo, J., and Ruiz-Verdú, P.. “The Relation between Price and Performance in the Mutual Fund Industry.” Journal of Finance, 64 (2009), 21532183.Google Scholar
Goldie, B.; Henry, T.; and Kassa, H.. “Does MAX Matter for Mutual Funds?” European Financial Management, forthcoming, (2019).Google Scholar
Green, T. C., and Hwang, B.-H.. “Initial Public Offerings as Lotteries: Skewness Preference and First-Day Returns.” Management Science, 58 (2012), 432444.Google Scholar
Gruber, M. J.Another Puzzle: The Growth in Actively Managed Mutual Funds.” Journal of Finance, 51 (1996), 783810.Google Scholar
Harvey, C. R., and Siddique, A.. “Conditional Skewness in Asset Pricing Tests.” Journal of Finance, 55 (2000), 12631295.Google Scholar
Hong, H., and Stein, J. C.. “Differences of Opinion, Short-Sales Constraints, and Market Crashes.” Review of Financial Studies, 16 (2003), 487525.Google Scholar
Hu, G.; McLean, R. D.; Pontiff, J.; and Wang, Q.. “The Year-End Trading Activities of Institutional Investors: Evidence from Daily Trades.” Review of Financial Studies, 27 (2014), 15931614.Google Scholar
Huang, J.; Wei, K. D.; and Yan, H.. “Participation Costs and the Sensitivity of Fund Flows to Past Performance.” Journal of Finance, 62 (2007), 12731311.Google Scholar
Investment Company Institute. Investment Company Factbook: Recent Mutual Fund Trends. Washington, DC: Investment Company Institute(2011).Google Scholar
Investment Company Institute. Investment Company Factbook: Recent Mutual Fund Trends. Washington, DC: Investment Company Institute(2015).Google Scholar
Jain, P. C., and Wu, J. S.. “Truth in Mutual Fund Advertising: Evidence on Future Performance and Fund Flows.” Journal of Finance, 55 (2000), 937958.Google Scholar
Kacperczyk, M.; Sialm, C.; and Zheng, L. U.. “On the Industry Concentration of Actively Managed Equity Mutual Funds.” Journal of Finance, 60 (2005), 19832011.Google Scholar
Kaniel, R.; Ozoguz, A.; and Starks, L.. “The High Volume Return Premium: Cross-Country Evidence.” Journal of Financial Economics, 103 (2012), 255279.Google Scholar
Kaniel, R., and Parham, R.. “WSJ Category Kings—The Impact of Media Attention on Consumer and Mutual Fund Investment Decisions.” Journal of Financial Economics, 123 (2017), 337356.Google Scholar
Kaniel, R.; Starks, L.; and Vasudevan, V.. “Headlines and Bottom Lines: Media Coverage and Mutual Funds.” Working Paper, Fuqua School of Business, Duke University (2007).Google Scholar
Kumar, A.Who Gambles in the Stock Market?Journal of Finance, 64 (2009), 18891933.Google Scholar
Kumar, A.; Page, J. K.; and Spalt, O. G.. “Religious Beliefs, Gambling Attitudes, and Financial Market Outcomes.” Journal of Financial Economics, 102 (2012), 671708.Google Scholar
Lakonishok, J.; Shleifer, A.; Thaler, R.; and Vishny, R.. “Window Dressing by Pension Fund Managers.” American Economic Review, 81 (1991), 227231.Google Scholar
Lewellen, J., and Nagel, S.. “The Conditional CAPM Does Not Explain Asset-Pricing Anomalies.” Journal of Financial Economics, 82 (2006), 289314.Google Scholar
Merton, R. C.A Simple Model of Capital Market Equilibrium with Incomplete Information.” Journal of Finance, 42 (1987), 483510.Google Scholar
Miller, E. M.Risk, Uncertainty, and Divergence of Opinion.” Journal of Finance, 32 (1977), 11511168.Google Scholar
Mitton, T., and Vorkink, K.. “Equilibrium Underdiversification and the Preference for Skewness.” Review of Financial Studies, 20 (2007), 12551288.Google Scholar
Mullainathan, S.“Thinking through Categories.” Working Paper, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2001).Google Scholar
Newey, W. K., and West, K. D.. “A Simple, Positive Semi-Definite, Heteroskedasticity and Autocorrelation Consistent Covariance Matrix.” Econometrica, 55 (1987), 703708.Google Scholar
Nofsinger, J. R., and Sias, R. W.. “Herding and Feedback Trading by Institutional and Individual Investors.” Journal of Finance, 54 (1999), 22632295.Google Scholar
Petersen, M. A.Estimating Standard Errors in Finance Panel Data Sets: Comparing Approaches.” Review of Financial Studies, 22 (2009), 435480.Google Scholar
Pomorski, L.“Style Investing: Evidence from Mutual Fund Flows.” Working Paper, University of Toronto (2004).Google Scholar
Sensoy, B. A.Performance Evaluation and Self-Designated Benchmark Indexes in the Mutual Fund Industry.” Journal of Financial Economics, 92 (2009), 2539.Google Scholar
Shive, S., and Yun, H.. “Are Mutual Funds Sitting Ducks?Journal of Financial Economics, 107 (2013), 220237.Google Scholar
Sias, R. W., and Starks, L. T.. “Institutions and Individuals at the Turn-of-the-Year.” Journal of Finance, 52 (1997), 15431562.Google Scholar
Sirri, E. R., and Tufano, P.. “Costly Search and Mutual Fund Flows.” Journal of Finance, 53 (1998), 15891622.Google Scholar
Spiegel, M., and Zhang, H.. “Mutual Fund Risk and Market Share-Adjusted Fund Flows.” Journal of Financial Economics, 108 (2013), 506528.Google Scholar
Teo, M., and Woo, S.-J.. “Persistence in Style-Adjusted Mutual Fund Returns.” Working Paper, Harvard University (2001).Google Scholar
Treynor, J., and Mazuy, K.. “Can Mutual Funds Outguess the Market.” Harvard Business Review, 44 (1966), 131136.Google Scholar
Tversky, A., and Kahneman, D.. “Advances in Prospect Theory: Cumulative Representation of Uncertainty.” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5 (1992), 297323.Google Scholar
Wermers, R.“Is Money Really ‘Smart’? New Evidence on the Relation between Mutual Fund Flows, Manager Behavior, and Performance Persistence.” Working Paper, University of Maryland (2004).Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Akbas and Genc supplementary material

Akbas and Genc supplementary material

Download Akbas and Genc supplementary material(File)
File 546.4 KB