Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T10:08:11.888Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Legislated Adjustment of Labor Disputes: An Empirical Analysis, 1880 to 1894

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2009

Joshua Gotkin
Joshua Gotkin
Affiliation:
Economic Research Services, Tallahassee, Florida
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Summaries of Doctoral Dissertations
Information
The Journal of Economic History , Volume 57 , Issue 2 , June 1997 , pp. 481 - 484
Copyright
Copyright © The Economic History Association 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Farber, Henry, and Katz, Harry. “Interest Arbitration, Outcomes, and the Incentive to Bargain.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 33 (10 1979): 55–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiorina, Morris. Representatives, Roll Calls, and Constituencies. Lexington: Lexington Books, 1974.Google Scholar
Gilligan, Thomas T., Marshall, William J., and Weingast, Barry R. “The Economic Incidence of the Interstate Commerce Act of 1887.” RAND Journal of Economics 21, no. 2 (summer 1990): 189–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalt, Joseph P., and Zupan, Mark A. “Capture Theory and Ideology in the Economic Theory of Politics.” American Economic Review 74, no. 3 (06 1984): 279–300.Google Scholar
Prager, Robin. “Using Stock Price Data to Measure the Effects of Regulation: The Interstate Commerce Act and the Railroad Industry.” RAND Journal of Economics 20, no. 2 (summer 1989): 280–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevens, Carl M. “Is Compulsory Arbitration Compatible with Bargaining.” Industrial Relations 5, no. 2 (02 1966): 38–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stigler, G. S., and Friedland, Claire. “What Can Regulators Regulate? The Case of Electricity.” Journal of Law and Economics 5 (10 1962): 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tollison, Robert D. “Rent Seeking: A Survey.” Kyklos, v35 (1982): 575–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United States Commissioner of Labor. Third Annual Report of the Commissioner of Labor Strikes and Lockouts, 1887. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1889.Google Scholar
United States Commissioner of Labor. Tenth Annual Report of the Commissioner of Labor Strikes and Lockouts, 1895. Washington, DC: Govermnent Printing Office, 1897.Google Scholar